Skip to main content

Miles without milestones: A critical look at India’s foreign policy under Prime Minister Modi

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  
Travel connects the traveler with the destination, giving meaning to both the journey and the path. When there is a disconnect between the traveler, the road, and the destination, the journey becomes directionless. In politics, the value of international travel lies in the tangible and intangible dividends it yields—economic partnerships, diplomatic alliances, cultural exchanges, and strategic cooperation. It is not the frequency of travel that matters, but the depth of engagement and the outcomes achieved. Meaningful travel contributes to national interests through collective memories, friendships, and shared values.
Between March 27, 2021, and September 1, 2025, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made thirty-five foreign trips, visiting nearly sixty countries. From June 16, 2014, to November 13, 2019, he undertook fifty-eight trips, covering almost 110 countries. In total, approximately ninety-three foreign visits were made between 2014 and 2021. These included ten visits to the United States; eight each to France and Japan; seven each to the UAE and Russia; six each to China and Germany; five each to Nepal and Singapore; and four each to the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Sri Lanka. Other countries such as Bhutan, Indonesia, the Maldives, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, and Uzbekistan were visited three times each, with many others visited once or twice. This extensive travel has led to the informal moniker of a “Non-Resident Indian Prime Minister.”
Despite these frequent visits, India’s bilateral relations with key partners have not significantly improved. Indo–U.S. relations, for instance, have faced challenges in trade, defense, and diplomacy. While ideological admiration for Western powers has been evident, it has not translated into stronger strategic ties. The United States continues to impose high tariffs and exert influence over India’s relationships with other nations, including Russia and Pakistan. Diplomatic gestures and public camaraderie have not yielded substantial policy outcomes.
Engagement with the European Union has similarly fallen short. Despite extensive travel across Europe, India’s trade, security, and scientific collaborations remain underdeveloped. Public praise from European leaders often contrasts with actions that undermine India’s interests. The recent free trade agreement with Britain has raised concerns over its fairness and long-term impact on India’s economy.
India’s neighborhood policy has weakened, even as traditional allies in Africa, Latin America, and the former Soviet bloc maintain goodwill. This support persists despite India’s increasing alignment with Western powers that have historically opposed the interests of developing nations. These powers promote authoritarian regimes, exploit markets under the guise of free trade, and fuel instability for resource extraction. Yet, admiration for Western models remains strong within India’s current foreign policy framework.
The ideological orientation of India’s foreign policy has shifted away from its anti-colonial and non-aligned roots. The sidelining of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), once a cornerstone of India’s international strategy, marks a significant departure from principles of peaceful coexistence and solidarity with developing nations. This shift has affected India’s global standing and its ability to advocate for equitable international norms.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of foreign travel in diplomacy should be measured by its contribution to national interests. The outcomes of India’s current foreign policy suggest that international visits have prioritized image-building over substantive gains. Despite high-profile meetings and symbolic gestures, India has struggled to forge new alliances or deepen existing ones. The frequent travel has not translated into meaningful milestones.
Reviving India’s international image and protecting its interests requires more than a change in leadership—it demands a reorientation of foreign policy away from ideological rigidity and toward pragmatic engagement. Rebuilding relationships rooted in historic solidarities and shared struggles against colonialism, capitalism, and imperialism is essential for restoring India’s role as a leader among developing nations.
---
*Academic based in UK

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.