Skip to main content

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* 
In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.
This has occurred despite the fact that the India–US trade agreement has been commercially advantageous to India on several counts. Notably, the agreed tariff of 18 per cent for Indian exports to the US is significantly lower than the tariffs offered by the US to other countries such as China, Bangladesh and Pakistan. From a purely trade perspective, this represents a favourable outcome for India.
Trade agreements typically operate on the principle of mutual concessions, requiring an understanding of the priorities and constraints of all parties involved. In the Indian context, some apprehension has been expressed regarding the potential impact of the US agreement on the agricultural sector, particularly concerning the possible liberalised import of certain agricultural products such as soyabean from the US. Sections of the farming community have voiced concerns, and opposition political parties critical of the Modi government have highlighted potential risks to domestic agriculture.
However, several experienced analysts and policy observers have argued that these fears may be overstated. Taking a broader and more holistic view, the India–US trade agreement has, in general, received technical acceptance in India.
The controversy surrounding the agreement appears to stem less from its commercial provisions and more from geopolitical considerations. The US President has stated that the trade agreement was signed on the basis of India’s assurance that it would completely stop importing Russian crude oil. He has also indicated that if India continues to purchase Russian oil, the agreed tariff structure could be reconsidered and revised.
This position has generated unease within India. Many view the insistence that India cease imports of Russian oil as an infringement on India’s independent decision-making. Public opinion in India, which places a high value on sovereignty and strategic autonomy, has reacted negatively to what is perceived as external pressure.
Officially, India has responded cautiously. The government has reiterated that it will purchase crude oil from any source based on market prices and national interest. Notably, India has neither directly accepted nor outright rejected the US position, choosing instead to articulate its stance in general terms.
Several observers believe that acceding to US pressure to halt Russian oil imports would be politically and economically disadvantageous for India. Russia has maintained a long-standing and consistent strategic relationship with India and has supported the country at critical moments in geopolitical affairs. In contrast, India–US governmental relations have experienced fluctuations over time, even though people-to-people ties between the two countries remain strong.
Russia is currently under significant economic pressure due to sanctions imposed by the US and NATO countries. A complete halt in Indian crude oil purchases would further strain the Russian economy, an outcome that many in India are reluctant to endorse.
From an economic standpoint, Russian crude has been available to India at comparatively lower prices. In December 2025, the price of Russian crude supplied to India was USD 469 per tonne, compared to USD 506.7 per tonne for crude from the US. Crude oil prices from the UAE stood at USD 529.4 per tonne, while Saudi Arabian crude was priced at USD 503.2 per tonne during the same period. Supplies from countries such as Venezuela involve heavy-grade crude, which entails higher processing costs for Indian refineries.
A complete shift away from Russian crude would therefore increase India’s oil import bill, potentially pushing it to an economically uncomfortable level.
In summary, halting Russian oil imports under external pressure could have implications for India’s economic interests as well as its perception of strategic autonomy. A substantial section of opinion in India believes that the country should not accede to demands to stop buying Russian oil, regardless of the potential consequences for the trade agreement.
It remains to be seen how the Modi government will navigate this complex issue. Equally uncertain is how the US administration—often described as unpredictable—would respond if India continues its current oil procurement strategy. In geopolitical and trade terms, India and the US remain important partners. India is now the world’s fourth-largest economy, and its contribution to global GDP growth exceeds that of the US. From a strategic perspective, the US may also be constrained in how far it can afford to alienate India.
These factors are likely to weigh heavily in any decision regarding a possible revision of the trade agreement. Ultimately, the situation raises a familiar question in international negotiations: which side will yield first?
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Labour unrest in Manesar trigger tensions: Recently enacted labour codes blamed

By A Representative   A civil rights coalition has expressed concern over recent developments in the industrial hub of Manesar in Haryana, where a series of labour actions and police responses have drawn attention. A statement, released by the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), said it stood in solidarity with workers in IMT Manesar and other parts of the country, while also alleging instances of police excess during ongoing unrest.