Skip to main content

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 
Yet the tremors are real. Several governments, particularly in Europe, appear to be under stress. The Labour government in the UK faces difficult days ahead, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer may have to answer hard questions after one of his key ambassadorial appointments was found to have close ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
I do not wish to speculate on whose names appear or do not appear in the files. I neither have the time nor the resources to go through the massive volume of documents, videos, and material circulating. This requires teams of experts, and every country claims to be looking into it. I have little trust in Indian agencies doing so honestly, as they lack the autonomy required to challenge the powerful and the privileged.
The Epstein scandal has reinforced what many of us have been saying for years: capitalism is passing through one of its deepest crises. Frankly, it has failed as a model even in so-called liberal and democratic societies. One does not truly get freedom and liberty from backroom corporate games. 
In our part of the world, intellectuals often suffered precisely because they spoke the truth and refused to align with power. In the liberal democratic world, however, intellectuals themselves frequently possess enormous net worth, enjoy proximity to power, and are funded by corporate interests to push and legitimise specific agendas.
Many opponents of Donald Trump believed this scandal would weaken him, but instead it appears to have shaken the Western “deep state.” Whether Trump himself will be directly impacted remains uncertain. Some felt his aggressive posturing on Venezuela and Iran was an attempt to divert attention from his name appearing frequently in the files. 
Trump’s Iran bravado, however, failed to take off, with both Russia and China standing firmly with Iran. The United States continues to bully smaller nations, often through covert operations. European leaders who lecture the world on human rights remained shamelessly silent through all this. When Trump threatened to annex Greenland, EU leaders were busy warning about a Russian threat.
India’s role deserves special mention. Indian foreign policy has displayed why even close allies hesitate to trust New Delhi. President Vladimir Putin’s visit yielded little. Indian leadership could not even defend the purchase of Russian oil, which benefited the country immensely, though ordinary Indians saw little direct gain. Instead, it primarily helped large corporate houses that meekly surrendered to American diktats. 
The so-called US–India trade deal announced by Trump appeared deeply suspicious. It looked less like a deal and more like a diktat—flooding Indian markets with American products and effectively handing over agriculture to foreign interests, following a similar arrangement with the EU. Was this done under pressure? Was India bullied because of developments in the US involving India? We may know in time. What is clear is that such arrangements harm Indian farmers and national interest.
An Indian “religious intellectual” has reportedly found his name in the notorious Epstein emails. It would not be surprising if several more self-proclaimed liberal babas also enjoyed the so-called “spiritual atmosphere” of Epstein’s island.
Based on information circulating on social media, the apparent winner in the current crisis is Vladimir Putin and Russia. 
Western media has long portrayed Putin as a dictator and villain, but one of his speeches is now going viral, in which he warned Western citizens about leadership controlled by a deep state. Other so-called villains—Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, or Iranian leaders—are conspicuously absent from this liberal democratic ecosystem.
The impact of these revelations on Western socio-cultural life remains to be seen. One thing, however, is clear: deep states everywhere have used such networks to strike dirty deals. Jeffrey Epstein was not merely running a criminal operation; he was influencing global elites and decision-making. He could not have acted alone. This required an entire ecosystem—political power, greedy business leaders, compliant media, academics providing intellectual cover for illegitimate deals, gurus offering a “spiritual” façade, and billionaires funding charities to launder reputations.
The global crisis we are witnessing stems from this predatory elite that seeks to control resources worldwide. There are, however, leaders who resisted. Fidel Castro stood up for Cuba, which is why a small nation could withstand American pressure for decades. Today, similar forces are at work in Iran, Gaza, the West Bank, and Venezuela. These conflicts have nothing to do with “Make America Great Again”; they are about allowing big corporations to profit from the suffering of ordinary people.
The collapse of this rotten global order seems inevitable. A major restructuring and churning are underway. Russia, China, Cuba, Brazil, Iran, and South Africa are speaking up. But where does India stand? The current regime appears comfortable aligning with Western status quo forces. 
It has remained silent on the kidnapping of Venezuela’s president and on threats of strikes against Iran. It has not firmly countered Trump’s claim that India would stop buying Russian oil. If Trump’s statements are true, it bodes poorly for India. A country of India’s stature deserves better. One hopes wisdom will prevail and India will state clearly and boldly that it will not compromise on its priorities, including decisions about energy purchases. India must stand up to Trump’s bullying tactics. The coming days will reveal much.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Budget 2026 focuses on pharma and medical tourism, overlooks public health needs: JSAI

By A Representative   Jan Swasthya Abhiyan India (JSAI) has criticised the Union Budget 2026, stating that it overlooks core public health needs while prioritising the pharmaceutical industry, private healthcare, medical tourism, public-private partnerships, and exports related to AYUSH systems. In a press note issued from New Delhi, the public health network said that primary healthcare services and public health infrastructure continue to remain underfunded despite repeated policy assurances.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

Silencing the university: How fear is replacing debate in academic India

By Sunil Kyumar*  “Republic Day is a powerful symbol of our freedom, Constitution, and democratic values. This festival gives us renewed energy and inspiration to move forward together with the resolve of nation-building”, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 26, 2026. On this occasion, the Prime Minister also shared a Sanskrit subhashita— “Paratantryābhibhūtasya deśasyābhyudayaḥ kutaḥ. Ataḥ svātantryamāptavyaṁ aikyaṁ svātantryasādhanam.”

Harsh Mander moves police over Assam CM’s remarks on Bengali-speaking Muslims

By A Representative   Peace and justice worker and writer Harsh Mander has filed a police complaint against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma over public statements made on January 27 at an official event in Digboi, Tinsukia district, alleging that the remarks promote hatred, harassment and discrimination against Bengali-speaking Muslims in Assam. 

Advisor appointment rekindles debate on governance in Jammu & Kashmir

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  The government in Jammu and Kashmir has completed approximately one and a half years in office. During the initial phase of its tenure, public expectations were shaped by commitments made during the election campaign. In particular, the Chief Minister, Omar Abdullah, stated at a press conference held at the Sher-i-Kashmir International Conference Centre (SKICC) that major promises would be addressed within the first six months of governance. As the government has now crossed two such six-month periods, public discourse continues to assess the extent to which these commitments have been met.