Skip to main content

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 
Yet the tremors are real. Several governments, particularly in Europe, appear to be under stress. The Labour government in the UK faces difficult days ahead, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer may have to answer hard questions after one of his key ambassadorial appointments was found to have close ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
I do not wish to speculate on whose names appear or do not appear in the files. I neither have the time nor the resources to go through the massive volume of documents, videos, and material circulating. This requires teams of experts, and every country claims to be looking into it. I have little trust in Indian agencies doing so honestly, as they lack the autonomy required to challenge the powerful and the privileged.
The Epstein scandal has reinforced what many of us have been saying for years: capitalism is passing through one of its deepest crises. Frankly, it has failed as a model even in so-called liberal and democratic societies. One does not truly get freedom and liberty from backroom corporate games. 
In our part of the world, intellectuals often suffered precisely because they spoke the truth and refused to align with power. In the liberal democratic world, however, intellectuals themselves frequently possess enormous net worth, enjoy proximity to power, and are funded by corporate interests to push and legitimise specific agendas.
Many opponents of Donald Trump believed this scandal would weaken him, but instead it appears to have shaken the Western “deep state.” Whether Trump himself will be directly impacted remains uncertain. Some felt his aggressive posturing on Venezuela and Iran was an attempt to divert attention from his name appearing frequently in the files. 
Trump’s Iran bravado, however, failed to take off, with both Russia and China standing firmly with Iran. The United States continues to bully smaller nations, often through covert operations. European leaders who lecture the world on human rights remained shamelessly silent through all this. When Trump threatened to annex Greenland, EU leaders were busy warning about a Russian threat.
India’s role deserves special mention. Indian foreign policy has displayed why even close allies hesitate to trust New Delhi. President Vladimir Putin’s visit yielded little. Indian leadership could not even defend the purchase of Russian oil, which benefited the country immensely, though ordinary Indians saw little direct gain. Instead, it primarily helped large corporate houses that meekly surrendered to American diktats. 
The so-called US–India trade deal announced by Trump appeared deeply suspicious. It looked less like a deal and more like a diktat—flooding Indian markets with American products and effectively handing over agriculture to foreign interests, following a similar arrangement with the EU. Was this done under pressure? Was India bullied because of developments in the US involving India? We may know in time. What is clear is that such arrangements harm Indian farmers and national interest.
An Indian “religious intellectual” has reportedly found his name in the notorious Epstein emails. It would not be surprising if several more self-proclaimed liberal babas also enjoyed the so-called “spiritual atmosphere” of Epstein’s island.
Based on information circulating on social media, the apparent winner in the current crisis is Vladimir Putin and Russia. 
Western media has long portrayed Putin as a dictator and villain, but one of his speeches is now going viral, in which he warned Western citizens about leadership controlled by a deep state. Other so-called villains—Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, or Iranian leaders—are conspicuously absent from this liberal democratic ecosystem.
The impact of these revelations on Western socio-cultural life remains to be seen. One thing, however, is clear: deep states everywhere have used such networks to strike dirty deals. Jeffrey Epstein was not merely running a criminal operation; he was influencing global elites and decision-making. He could not have acted alone. This required an entire ecosystem—political power, greedy business leaders, compliant media, academics providing intellectual cover for illegitimate deals, gurus offering a “spiritual” façade, and billionaires funding charities to launder reputations.
The global crisis we are witnessing stems from this predatory elite that seeks to control resources worldwide. There are, however, leaders who resisted. Fidel Castro stood up for Cuba, which is why a small nation could withstand American pressure for decades. Today, similar forces are at work in Iran, Gaza, the West Bank, and Venezuela. These conflicts have nothing to do with “Make America Great Again”; they are about allowing big corporations to profit from the suffering of ordinary people.
The collapse of this rotten global order seems inevitable. A major restructuring and churning are underway. Russia, China, Cuba, Brazil, Iran, and South Africa are speaking up. But where does India stand? The current regime appears comfortable aligning with Western status quo forces. 
It has remained silent on the kidnapping of Venezuela’s president and on threats of strikes against Iran. It has not firmly countered Trump’s claim that India would stop buying Russian oil. If Trump’s statements are true, it bodes poorly for India. A country of India’s stature deserves better. One hopes wisdom will prevail and India will state clearly and boldly that it will not compromise on its priorities, including decisions about energy purchases. India must stand up to Trump’s bullying tactics. The coming days will reveal much.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Labour unrest in Manesar trigger tensions: Recently enacted labour codes blamed

By A Representative   A civil rights coalition has expressed concern over recent developments in the industrial hub of Manesar in Haryana, where a series of labour actions and police responses have drawn attention. A statement, released by the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), said it stood in solidarity with workers in IMT Manesar and other parts of the country, while also alleging instances of police excess during ongoing unrest.