Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*

The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.

As the world steps into 2026, people everywhere hope for respite and renewal. Yet such optimism seems misplaced. Donald Trump of the United States, Xi Jinping of China, and Vladimir Putin of Russia appear determined to pursue territorial expansion with little regard for international order or responsibility. Their ambitions threaten to make 2026 another year of turmoil.

Millions across the globe—including citizens of China, Russia, and the United States—are disillusioned. Territorial greed and the wars it provokes ultimately devastate ordinary families, not the leaders who instigate them. The policies of these three men stand in stark defiance of the principles of peace championed by Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and other global icons.

Xi Jinping’s Expansionism

China’s territorial ambitions are neither new nor restrained. In 1950, Beijing invaded Tibet, massacring thousands who resisted. Since then, Tibet has remained under a suffocating grip, denied freedom and free speech.

In 1962, China launched war against India, seizing thousands of kilometers of territory in Ladakh. Today, it continues to claim Arunachal Pradesh as its own. Beyond India, China disputes ownership of the Senkaku Islands, asserts control over the South China Sea, and now threatens to invade Taiwan.

China’s appetite for land appears limitless.

Putin’s War

In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine under the pretext of NATO expansion. The war drags on with no end in sight, and Moscow openly declares it will not vacate occupied territories.

This conflict is a stark exhibition of Putin’s territorial greed, pursued at the cost of countless lives and global stability.

Trump’s Claims

Donald Trump’s rhetoric and actions have shocked the world. He once declared that Canada should become the 51st state of the United States. More recently, he invaded Venezuela, citing drug trafficking as justification, and proclaimed himself “acting president” of the country.

Trump has also laid claim to Greenland, arguing that U.S. security requires its annexation to prevent Russian or Chinese influence. These moves reveal not strategy but insatiable greed. What his next target might be remains uncertain, but the pattern is unmistakable.

What Lies Ahead in 2026

Wars and conflicts have long scarred human history, often rooted in local disputes. What distinguishes today’s crises is the scale of territorial greed driving them.

With Trump, Xi, and Putin entrenched in power, their ambitions will continue to sow seeds of war. To expect 2026 to be more peaceful than 2025 would be naïve.

Voices of peace resound across the world, but they remain cries in the wilderness. The territorial greed of these leaders is so entrenched that they are unlikely to heed the wisdom of Gandhi, King, or Mandela.

Many observers now conclude that the absence of war is a utopian dream. As long as leaders wield economic and military strength to pursue expansion, conflicts will persist. Trump, Xi, and Putin exemplify this grim reality.

---

Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai* The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan* An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.

Search This Blog