Skip to main content

Why 20 years later, Rang De Basanti feels less like cinema, more like warning

By Mohd Ziyaullah Khan* 
This Republic Day, the Rang De Basanti, starring Aamir Khan, completed 20 years since its release. I first watched it in a single-screen theatre in my city—at a time when multiplexes were only just beginning to appear and our town was still waiting for one. It remains my favourite film, and I often revisit it on OTT platforms or television around Independence Day or Republic Day, when the air is thick with rehearsed patriotism.
A few days ago, I noticed it streaming again on Jio Hotstar. Released in 2006, it is a film I have watched many times over the years. Yet, like all powerful cinema, returning to it at different stages of life offers a different experience. Twenty years ago, I found it deeply inspiring. In 2026, watching it again felt suffocating.
At its core, the film follows a group of Delhi University friends who challenge the might of the central government after one of their own, a flight lieutenant, is killed in a MiG aircraft crash allegedly caused by faulty spares. Director Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra interweaves India’s freedom struggle with contemporary politics, forcing viewers to confront a haunting question: what really separates a terrorist from a revolutionary? The film spoke directly to the simmering frustration of India’s youth at the time and offered at least a direction, if not a solution. “Koi bhi desh perfect nahi hota. Ussey perfect banana padta hai” was not merely a line of dialogue; it became a generational mantra.
Its enduring power lies in its characters, each representing a strand of Indian youth. DJ, loud and fearless, masks deep insecurity about his place in the real world: “Asli zindagi mein apne jaise logon ko koi nahi puchta.” Sukhi is the loyal follower, without a will of his own, yet steadfast in friendship. Karan Singhania, the privileged heir, burns through his father’s wealth while craving validation: “Baap ka paisa hai, padey padey sadd jaata hai.” Aslam Khan embodies the Indian Muslim youth—patriotic yet perpetually asked to prove it, caught between conservative expectations and genuine camaraderie. Sonia Chaudhary is modern, ambitious and brave, negotiating patriarchy without surrendering her agency. Lakshman Pandey begins as a misguided nationalist who equates religion with patriotism, only to realise he has been manipulated by politics. Sue, the outsider, struggles to comprehend India’s contradictions but falls deeply in love with its people; her remark, “Tum logon ko ladne ka sirf bahana chahiye,” still stings with uncomfortable accuracy.
The film portrayed systemic corruption, communal polarisation, the commerce of religion and the ruthless instinct of those in power to cling to office. Even its symbolism was sharp. The right-wing Home Minister in the story is named D. N. Godse—an allusion too deliberate to miss.
When I watched the film in 2006, I walked out of the theatre energised. Candlelight protests inspired by the so-called “RDB effect” filled public spaces and dominated headlines. In 2026, I struggle to hold back tears while watching the same scenes. Two decades later, it is painful to admit that much of what angered us then persists, while public outrage seems to dissipate faster. Candlelight vigils today barely register with the media.
The archetypes, too, appear to have hardened. The idealistic DJ seems replaced by organised vigilante groups. Lakshman’s confused nationalism finds echoes in street-level aggression carried out in the name of patriotism. Many Karans have retreated into comfort or left the country. Aslams often speak more cautiously, conscious of how quickly suspicion can be manufactured. Sukhis still follow, though the moral clarity that once guided them feels rarer. Sonia’s battles—over autonomy, work, expression—continue, now amplified and distorted by online abuse.
There was irony even in 2006. The Ministry of Defence initially raised objections to the film. A special screening was reportedly arranged for then Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee, who cleared it, remarking that his duty was to defend the country, not censor films. It is difficult not to wonder how such a moment would unfold today.
“Koi bhi desh perfect nahi hota” now feels like a fading echo. In today’s climate, one wonders whether a film like Rang De Basanti would be greenlit with the same ease, or embraced by major stars without hesitation. The question is less about censorship and more about atmosphere—the invisible boundaries that shape what stories get told and how.
And yet, to reduce the present entirely to despair would be unfair. Now and then, sparks of courage and solidarity appear in unexpected places—ordinary citizens who step forward to protect strangers, to speak up, to refuse hatred. They may not command prime-time attention, but they keep alive the possibility that the film once stirred in us.
This is not a movie review. Rang De Basanti remains a timeless work of cinema, as powerful today as it was in 2006. What has changed is not the film, but the country watching it—and perhaps the viewer within me. Twenty years ago, it ignited hope and the conviction that questioning power was an act of patriotism. Today, it leaves a tightening in the throat, a reminder of ideals tested and dreams deferred. That is not nostalgia speaking; it is reckoning—a reflection on what we once believed we could become, and the distance we still have to travel.
---
*Freelance content writer & editor based in Nagpur; co-founder, TruthScape

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.