Skip to main content

Former top officials caution against 'extraneous considerations' in Census schedule

By A Representative 
A group of 90 retired civil servants under the banner of the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG) has written to Mritunjay Kumar Narayan, Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, raising concerns over the timing, methodology and transparency of the upcoming 2027 Census.
In a letter dated February 23, 2026, the group—comprising former officers of the IAS, IPS, IFS and other central services—said it was committed to upholding constitutional values and norms of public conduct. While acknowledging that the 2021 Census could not be conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the signatories questioned why the exercise had not been completed by 2023, as in many other countries. They said the reasons for a six-year delay had not been made public, leading to “unnecessary apprehensions” that the Census timing could be linked to the proposed delimitation of constituencies in 2027–28 ahead of the 2029 Lok Sabha elections. The group expressed hope that no extraneous considerations had influenced the schedule.
The CCG urged that the Census adhere strictly to the United Nations’ Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses (Revision 4, March 2025), to which India is a signatory. It cautioned that reliance on mobile-based data entry with pre-coded dropdown options at the field level could limit error correction and affect data quality. Drawing on experience from the 2001 and 2011 Censuses, the group noted that technological upgrades alone had not necessarily expedited data release and stressed the need for robust quality checks and openness to scrutiny.
The letter recommended streamlining the questionnaire by dropping items that are not essential or for which alternative data sources exist. For instance, it suggested that information on children born and surviving may be better captured through the National Family Health Survey. On caste enumeration, the group noted that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) have not been specifically classified in previous Censuses and said the methodology for the forthcoming exercise should be made public. It proposed leaving the caste field open, as in the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census, rather than relying solely on pre-listed categories. It also suggested involving academic and research institutions such as the Anthropological Survey of India to help validate and consolidate caste data, drawing on methods used in language enumeration.
The CCG further recommended expanding the scope of tribal data collection beyond the Scheduled Tribe list to include other tribal communities, arguing that this could address longstanding concerns of Denotified Tribes. On the sensitive issue of religion, the group called for careful handling to ensure accurate recording of minority populations, particularly in the context of public debates around citizenship and electoral rolls.
Stating that many of its members had been involved in Census operations at district, state and national levels during their service, the group expressed confidence that the Registrar General would ensure the exercise meets “the threefold goals of accuracy, transparency and accessibility.” The letter concluded with the sign-off “Satyameva Jayate” and was endorsed by several prominent former officials, including former Home Secretary G.K. Pillai, former Foreign Secretary K. Raghunath, former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa and former Delhi Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung, among others.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.