Skip to main content

Hindu diaspora group joins multifaith lawsuit, challenges the Trump-Vance religious panel

By A Representative 
Diaspora group Hindus For Human Rights (HfHR) has joined a multifaith coalition in filing a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump-Vance administration’s so-called “Religious Liberty Commission,” alleging that the commission was created and administered unlawfully and in violation of federal requirements intended to prevent secretive, unbalanced advisory bodies from shaping public policy.
HfHR filed the legal challenge alongside Interfaith Alliance, Muslims For Progressive Values, and the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF). The coalition is represented by Democracy Forward and Americans United for Separation of Church and State. The case, Interfaith Alliance et al. v. Trump et al., is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The Religious Liberty Commission was established by Executive Order 14291 on May 1, 2025. According to the lawsuit, it has been structured and operated in a manner that elevates a narrow and exclusionary understanding of religious liberty. The commission’s membership reportedly consists exclusively of Christians, with the exception of one Orthodox Jewish rabbi, and does not include representatives from Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, or nonreligious Americans.
Commission members have repeatedly framed the United States as a “Judeo-Christian” or Christian nation guided by Biblical principles — a viewpoint the coalition argues contradicts the constitutional promise of equal religious freedom and equal civic belonging for all Americans.
The lawsuit challenges the commission’s formation and operation under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), a federal law designed to ensure that advisory committees influencing national policy operate with transparency, serve the public interest, and reflect a fair balance of viewpoints rather than the priorities of a narrow set of special interests.
The legal action asks the court to:
1.Declare that the commission was created and administered in violation of federal law.
2.Require disclosure of records that should already be available to the public.
3.Ensure that any recommendations produced by the commission are clearly identified as coming from an unlawfully constituted body.
“Religious liberty means religious liberty for everyone, not just one faith community. By stacking this Religious Liberty Commission with a narrow set of voices and hiding the commission’s work from the public eye, the Trump administration is evading the transparency and balance that federal law requires. Hindus for Human Rights is proud to stand with our multifaith partners to defend a pluralistic democracy where Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, and nonreligious people all belong as equals", said Ria Chakrabarty, Senior Policy Director, HfHR.
HfHR emphasized that religious freedom cannot be reduced to government endorsement of one tradition’s worldview. For Hindu Americans and other minority faith communities, the consequences of religious favoritism are not abstract: they shape whether communities are treated as fully American, fully protected, and fully equal under the law.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.