Delhi university bans all protests on campus for one month, sparking free speech outcry

By A Representative

The University of Delhi's Office of the Proctor issued an order today prohibiting all public meetings, processions, demonstrations, and protests within the university campus for a period of one month, drawing immediate criticism from student activists and civil liberties advocates who have called it a direct assault on constitutional freedoms. Wonders Right to Education activist Mitra Ranjan, why shouldn't the order be seen as contradicting the need for democratisation of people's rights, university campuses and education and an attack on freedom of expression.

The order, bearing reference number PCTO/2026/ and signed by the Proctor on February 17, 2026, states that the ban has been necessitated by information suggesting that unrestricted public gatherings "may lead to obstruction of traffic, threats to human life, and disturbance of public peace." The administration further cited past instances where organisers had allegedly failed to control protests that escalated and spread widely, resulting in what the order described as "deterioration of law and order within the University campuses."

Among the most contentious provisions of the order is a prohibition on the assembly of five or more persons, a clause that activists say effectively criminalises ordinary student gatherings entirely. The order also bans the carrying of hazardous materials including mashals, beacons, and torches, the shouting of slogans, the making of speeches, and any activity deemed to affect the "general tranquillity of the public or the smooth flow of traffic." Critics have noted that the vagueness of this last provision grants university authorities sweeping discretionary power that could be selectively deployed against dissenting voices while leaving other gatherings undisturbed.

The university has justified the order in part by referencing a police order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sub-Division Civil Lines, dated December 26, 2025, under longstanding Ministry of Home Affairs notifications from 1978 and 2010. By anchoring its ban to an existing police directive, the university effectively extends a law enforcement prohibition into an academic space — a move that free speech advocates argue fundamentally contradicts the university's own purpose as a site of open inquiry and debate.

Student groups are expected to challenge the order on constitutional grounds, pointing to Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(1)(b) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantee citizens the rights to freedom of speech and expression and to assemble peaceably without arms. Legal observers note that any restriction on these rights must satisfy the constitutional test of being reasonable and proportionate. An outright ban on all protest activity, they argue, fails that test comprehensively, amounting to prior restraint — the suppression of speech before any actual harm has occurred rather than in response to it.

The absence of any specific triggering incident named in the order has further fuelled suspicion among activists, who question why the administration chose this particular moment to enforce such a sweeping restriction. The order comes into force immediately and will remain in effect for one month unless withdrawn earlier, with no independent appeal mechanism or judicial oversight built into its framework. Critics warn that such temporary orders have a tendency to be renewed indefinitely, and that the burden of withdrawal rests entirely with the same authority that issued the ban.

The University of Delhi has long been one of India's most politically active campuses, with a student union history stretching back decades and a tradition of engagement with national political movements. For many who have passed through its gates, the image of a campus where five students cannot gather without risking sanction represents not a preservation of order, but an abandonment of the university's fundamental identity. The order has been issued with the approval of what the document describes as the "Competent Authority," though no further detail is provided as to who that authority is or what process preceded the decision.

Comments

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai* The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan* An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.

Search This Blog