Skip to main content

Hate speeches decline in 2025, but remain potent tool for divisive politics: CSSS report

By A Representative 
A new report from the Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS) reveals a 47% drop in documented hate speeches targeting religious minorities in India last year, yet warns that the phenomenon persists as a deliberate strategy to fuel Islamophobia and majoritarian narratives. Authored by Irfan Engineer, Neha Dabhade, and Diya Padalkar, the study – titled Hate Speeches in 2025: A Weapon to Legitimize Divisive Narratives – analyzed reports from five major Mumbai-based newspapers and found 65 instances of hate speech, down from 122 in 2024.
"While our monitoring data indicates a decline or relatively low incidence of recorded hate speeches, it would be analytically unsound to interpret this as evidence that hate speech is no longer a serious concern in India," the authors write in the report. They attribute the lower figures not to a genuine reduction, but to methodological constraints, including reliance on print media alone. Broader monitoring efforts, such as those by India Hate Lab, documented over 1,300 in-person hate speech events in 2025, highlighting potential underreporting.
The report defines hate speech per the UN's framework as “any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are.” In India, it references sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – including 196 (promoting enmity between groups), 299 (outraging religious feelings), and 302 (wounding religious sentiments) – which carry penalties of up to three years' imprisonment.
A stark finding is the dominance of state actors in perpetuating hate: 53 of the 65 instances (81%) were delivered by Union ministers, state ministers, governors, and elected representatives. Non-state actors accounted for just 12 cases. "The reiteration of such narratives by actors in power not only legitimizes prejudice but also embeds discriminatory rhetoric within mainstream political discourse," Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar observe, emphasizing how these speeches dehumanize Muslims through tropes like "ghuspetiya" (infiltrators) and unsubstantiated claims of demographic conspiracies.
Leading the list was Maharashtra's Minister for Fisheries and Port Development, Nitesh Rane, with 10 instances, followed by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath (6), and Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and Union Home Minister Amit Shah (5 each). Prime Minister Narendra Modi was cited for three speeches. Of the total, 61 targeted Muslims, with only four against Hindus.
Geographically, BJP-ruled or coalition states bore the brunt: 83% of incidents (54 out of 65) occurred in such regions. Maharashtra topped the list with 17 cases, followed by Uttar Pradesh (13), Assam (10), and Bihar (9). "Most of the hate speeches specifically directed against Muslims were reported in BJP-ruled states," the authors note, with Maharashtra (16), Uttar Pradesh (13), Assam (9), Bihar (8), and Delhi (4) seeing the highest concentrations.
The report's most alarming revelation is the near-total lack of accountability. "A salient observation based on the data is that little or next to no action has been taken against individuals making hate speeches targeting Muslims or Christians," state Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar. Out of 65 anti-Muslim speeches, state action was initiated in only 11 cases – and even then, often without meaningful follow-through.
CSSS categorizes state responses into three types. First, speeches critical of BJP policies or Hindu icons are swiftly labeled hate speech and prosecuted, despite not meeting legal thresholds. Examples include a Bihar JDU MLA's academic comments on Aurangzeb (no action taken despite BJP demands) and a Maharashtra man's WhatsApp post on Shivaji Maharaj (FIR under BNS Sections 299, 356(2), and 352).
Second, the bulk of documented speeches – inciting enmity against Muslims via terms like "love jihad," "land jihad," or calls for economic boycotts – faced zero repercussions. High-profile examples include Yogi Adityanath likening mosque surveys to "surgery on a wound" (Uttar Pradesh), Nitesh Rane urging Hindus to boycott uncertified Muslim mutton shops and demanding a ban on Tablighi Jamaat's Ijtema as a "terrorist organization," and Himanta Biswa Sarma warning of a "hidden conspiracy" by Bangladeshi migrants to make Assamese a minority.
Third, all four speeches targeting Hindus (e.g., vulgar remarks on Hindu symbols by Tamil Nadu's K. Ponmudy or Baba Ramdev's "sharbat jihad" comment) led to FIRs, court interventions, or apologies. In one case, Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Kanwar Vijay Shah's derogatory remark against a Muslim officer prompted Supreme Court oversight and an SIT probe.
The authors critique this disparity as evidence of systemic bias: "These speeches reproduce and reinforce long-standing Islamophobic tropes... framing Muslims as a monolithic and perpetual threat to Hindus and, by extension, to the Indian nation-state."
Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar caution against complacency, noting that hate speech's real toll – eroding social cohesion and justifying exclusion – transcends raw numbers. They highlight how narratives vilifying Mughal history or alleging Muslim disloyalty erase India's pluralistic heritage and rationalize surveillance.
The report urges stricter enforcement of BNS provisions and expanded monitoring beyond print media to capture social media and vernacular sources. "The apparent reduction must be understood in light of the specific methodological framework adopted by CSSS," they conclude, calling for civil society and media to amplify underrepresented voices.
CSSS, a Mumbai-based think tank, has tracked hate speech annually since 2014.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.
Post a Comment
»

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”
Post a Comment
»

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.
Post a Comment
»

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.
Post a Comment
»

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.
Post a Comment
»

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.
Post a Comment
»

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...
2 comments
»

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).
Post a Comment
»

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.
Post a Comment
»