Skip to main content

Big promises, limited delivery? Rekha Gupta's first year as Delhi CM

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan* 
Delhi has witnessed women at the helm before, each leaving behind a distinct political and administrative imprint on the national capital. From diplomacy to development, the city's past female chief ministers shaped governance in their own ways. As Rekha Gupta completes one year in office, the question arises: has her tenure lived up to her ambitious promises?
After her first year, Gupta appears to have made tall claims but delivered little since taking the oath of office. Despite coming from a background in student politics, her report card as Delhi chief minister is far from impressive. She seems to understand the nuances of politics, yet she is often seen generating considerable buzz without substantial delivery on the ground.
For many observers, her underperformance comes as no surprise. Critics argue that the party's top leadership prefers leaders who do not overshadow the central high command with a larger-than-life image. Whether this perception holds weight remains a matter of debate.
Delhi's political history is marked by notable women leaders who brought unique strengths to governance. Sushma Swaraj was known for her diplomatic acumen and sharp political intelligence. Though her tenure as Delhi chief minister was brief, her administrative clarity and leadership style were widely acknowledged. Sheila Dikshit of the Congress, by contrast, redefined Delhi's urban landscape across three consecutive terms. Her developmental vision transformed the city's infrastructure, with the Delhi Metro standing as the most visible symbol of that era. Roads, flyovers, and urban renewal projects under her leadership reshaped the capital.
Against this backdrop, Rekha Gupta entered office with sweeping declarations but has little delivery to show on the ground.
When the BJP secured a majority in Delhi after two consecutive terms of AAP rule, it was seen as a significant political shift. Gupta's campaign promised a dramatic reduction in air pollution, cleaning and rejuvenation of the Yamuna, clean and uninterrupted water supply, improved civic infrastructure, and better environmental standards. Her promises resonated with a city fatigued by long-standing civic crises. With the BJP in power at the Centre, control through the Lieutenant Governor's office, and eventual dominance in the MCD as well, supporters described the arrangement as a "double engine" — and eventually a "triple engine" — government. The expectation was clear: seamless coordination would fast-track development.
One year on, critics argue that the gap between promises and performance remains wide. Despite the so-called "triple engine sarkar," residents continue to grapple with severe winter air pollution, persistent Yamuna contamination, broken roads and traffic congestion, waterlogging during monsoons, inadequate water supply in several areas, and a women's financial assistance scheme of ₹2,500 that remains on paper. Reports from independent and opposition-leaning platforms have described "no respite" for residents despite consolidated power structures. AAP leaders and other critics allege widespread failures, delayed welfare rollouts, and over-reliance on public relations optics rather than tangible governance. Several controversies and public gaffes have also drawn attention, as have internal criticisms within the party over air quality management.
One of the biggest announcements during Gupta's tenure was the Delhi Budget for 2025–26, presented on March 25, 2025. Set at ₹1 lakh crore, it became the largest budget in Delhi's history — a 31–32 per cent increase over the previous year's estimates of around ₹76,000 crore. The BJP government projected it as a "historic" blueprint aimed at building a self-reliant and developed Delhi. The budget emphasised infrastructure upgrades, pollution control, welfare schemes, and urban development. However, critics argue that implementation has been slow, that some schemes are expansions of central government programmes such as Ayushman Bharat rather than independent state innovations, and that promises on women's financial assistance and pollution mitigation remain partially implemented or delayed. Since the financial year runs until March 2026, the full impact of the budget will ultimately depend on execution — an area where scepticism remains strong.
Delhi's transition from two terms of AAP governance to BJP rule marked a significant political change. 
Many voters hoped that alignment between the Centre and the state would resolve long-standing friction and accelerate development. Yet, after one year, public sentiment appears mixed. Some residents acknowledge improvements in cleanliness drives and action against legacy waste. Others feel that little has changed in their daily lives, with pollution still suffocating winters, infrastructure gaps persisting, and civic complaints unresolved. Delhi remains a city struggling with entrenched structural problems that have spanned multiple administrations — from Congress to AAP and now BJP.
It is also important to recognise that Delhi's governance structure is uniquely complex. Power-sharing between the elected government, the Centre, and the Lieutenant Governor has historically complicated decision-making. The AAP-led government frequently complained of non-cooperation from the Union government, citing administrative hurdles as a major obstacle. The BJP, in response, claimed that a "double engine sarkar" would ensure smoother governance and better coordination. That claim now appears to ring hollow. With the BJP in power at the Centre, the state, and the MCD, it is effectively a "triple engine" government — yet there is little visible evidence of transformative governance on the ground. Long-standing environmental and urban crises demand sustained, coordinated execution rather than headline announcements. Critics argue that not only has implementation been weak, but even the seriousness of intent appears questionable.
As Rekha Gupta marks one year as Delhi chief minister, the broader assessment remains cautious. Her tenure began with expansive promises and a record-breaking budget, yet for many Delhiites, visible change on the ground appears limited. Critics call it a year of hollow claims, while supporters urge patience, arguing that structural reforms take time. The coming months — particularly the implementation phase of the ₹1 lakh crore budget — will be decisive. Whether her government can convert political dominance into measurable improvement will determine how history ultimately judges Rekha Gupta's first year in office.
For now, Delhi watches — hopeful, sceptical, and still waiting.
---
*Freelance content writer and editor based in Nagpur;  co-founder of TruthScape

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.