Skip to main content

New Delhi AI declaration faces questions on digital divide, surveillance, corporate control

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
After the advent of the computer and the internet, the world is now witnessing the rise of “Artificial Intelligence,” or AI. It is being claimed that almost every aspect of human activity can now be efficiently managed through AI. Even the uniquely human faculties of thinking and reasoning, we are told, can be replicated through intelligent systems. The recently held AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi was an effort to consolidate the global business and policy ecosystem around this new technological frontier. But what exactly emerged from that summit?
The AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi, concluded with the adoption of what was described as a historic “New Delhi Declaration” on global cooperation in the field of artificial intelligence. Representatives from around 91 countries and international organizations endorsed the declaration. It emphasized that the benefits of AI should be shared equitably across humanity, echoing the Indian philosophical ideals of “Sarvajan Hitaya, Sarvajan Sukhaya” (for the welfare and happiness of all) and “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” (the world is one family). The declaration stressed fair access to AI resources so that all countries can develop and deploy the technology for public good.
The summit is expected to promote long-term international partnerships and to position AI as a key driver of economic growth. According to the organizers, it will encourage nations to translate shared principles into actionable frameworks. With participation from both developed economies and emerging markets, the New Delhi Declaration represents a broad global effort to build consensus on AI development and enhance technological cooperation.
In a rapidly shifting geopolitical environment, countries across the world are prioritizing modern technologies and innovation. Development strategies increasingly incorporate advanced technologies, transforming traditional modes of work. The expanding scope of AI has significantly influenced global working patterns and the human role within them. Experts argue that AI is no longer merely a technical subject; it has become a force shaping society, economy, politics, and nearly every dimension of human life. In sectors such as healthcare, education, agriculture, industry, communication, security, and governance, AI has opened new possibilities. At the same time, it has introduced complex and far-reaching challenges.
AI is often regarded as the core of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Machine learning, data analytics, and automation have accelerated production and streamlined decision-making. In hospitals, AI assists in disease detection; for farmers, it provides weather forecasts and crop advisory services; in administration, it facilitates the digitization of public services. These are notable achievements. However, this technological transformation is not limited to tools and processes—it is reshaping social structures.
Automation driven by AI raises concerns about the elimination of traditional jobs, especially those requiring low and medium-level skills. Conversely, demand for high-technology skills is increasing. This divergence risks deepening social inequality. Without serious investment in reskilling, upskilling, and education, technology could become a source of division rather than empowerment.
At the core of AI lies data—and therein lies one of its greatest risks. The indiscriminate collection of citizens’ personal data, its commercial exploitation, and state surveillance threaten the right to privacy. Technologies such as facial recognition, introduced in the name of security, can potentially undermine democratic freedoms. A fundamental question arises: who will control AI—citizens, or powerful states and corporations?
AI is not inherently neutral. It reproduces the biases embedded in the data on which it is trained. If datasets reflect prejudices related to caste, gender, class, or race, AI-driven decisions may perpetuate discrimination. In areas such as judicial processes, recruitment systems, and credit distribution, the consequences can be serious. Ethical standards and accountability mechanisms are therefore indispensable.
At present, AI technology is largely dominated by a handful of countries and multinational corporations. This raises the specter of a new form of digital colonialism, where developing nations risk becoming mere consumers. For countries like India, it is essential to develop AI not merely as a market commodity but as an instrument of public welfare.
Artificial intelligence neither deserves blind praise nor fearful rejection. What is required is democratic oversight, a robust legal framework, ethical norms, and public-interest-oriented policies. The use of AI in education, healthcare, environmental protection, and social justice will be meaningful only if human dignity, equality, and rights remain central. Ultimately, the question is not about technology itself, but about our social vision.
Will AI determine the future, or will we decide how AI shapes that future? The answer depends on the choices we make. To harness AI’s potential in India, strong initiatives in skill development, reskilling, and AI literacy are essential. The country currently lacks adequate advanced computing infrastructure, semiconductor manufacturing capacity, and hyperscale data centers necessary for competitive AI development.
Meanwhile, large corporations are increasingly deploying AI to cut costs, often resulting in job reductions. In this context, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Kristalina Georgieva, has issued a stark warning about AI’s impact on employment. She has cautioned that nearly 40 percent of entry-level jobs worldwide are at risk from AI, a figure that could rise to 60 percent in advanced economies. For India, she suggested the exposure may be around 26 percent.
The possibility that AI could pose a long-term threat to human civilization is now the subject of global debate. Many experts, researchers, and technology leaders have expressed concern that unchecked AI development could create existential risks. If the pace of AI innovation outstrips the establishment of safety standards and regulatory frameworks, it may generate dangers that humanity is ill-prepared to manage. As writer and journalist Priyadarshan has observed, if the internet diminished our memory, AI may erode our imagination. Planning for the future must take this challenge seriously.
---
*Senior activist of the Bargi Dam Displaced Association

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.
Post a Comment
»

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”
Post a Comment
»

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.
Post a Comment
»

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.
Post a Comment
»

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.
Post a Comment
»

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.
Post a Comment
»

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...
2 comments
»

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).
Post a Comment
»

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.
Post a Comment
»