Skip to main content

How Korean War legacy remains central to regional and global security dynamics in the peninsula

By Harsh Thakor* 
Seventy five years ago a most devastating Korean War broke out, which lasted from 1950 to 1953. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) was established in 1948 under Kim Il Sung, following the end of Japanese colonial rule in 1945. After Japan’s surrender in World War II, Korea was divided along the 38th parallel into two zones of occupation — Soviet-controlled in the north and U.S.-controlled in the south. This division, initially intended to be temporary, became permanent with the creation of two separate governments: the Republic of Korea in the south and the DPRK in the north.
Before this formal division, local People’s Committees had been established across the peninsula, and in September 1945, a short-lived Korean People’s Republic was proclaimed. However, U.S. authorities in the south dissolved these committees and disbanded the republic. Political conflict and ideological polarization deepened between the northern and southern administrations.
In May 1948, elections were held in the south under United Nations supervision, leading to the formation of the Republic of Korea with Syngman Rhee as president. The north responded by declaring the formation of the DPRK in September 1948.
On June 25, 1950, fighting broke out when North Korean forces crossed the 38th parallel and advanced south, capturing Seoul within days. The United States and other United Nations member states intervened in support of South Korea, while Chinese forces later entered the conflict on behalf of the north. The Soviet Union provided material support to North Korea.
The war resulted in an estimated 4 million deaths, including a large number of civilians, and caused extensive destruction throughout the Korean Peninsula. According to postwar investigations, both sides committed violations against civilian populations, though South Korean government inquiries have acknowledged that a majority of civilian massacres occurred under South Korean command during the early phase of the conflict. The United States dropped over 600,000 tons of bombs on North Korea, devastating its cities and infrastructure.
Hostilities ended in July 1953 with the signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement, which established the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) near the 38th parallel. No peace treaty was ever signed, and the peninsula technically remains in a state of armistice.
In the aftermath of the war, North Korea developed a centrally planned economy based on state and cooperative ownership, while South Korea pursued a capitalist model under U.S. influence. Both states claimed legitimacy as the sole government of Korea.
The DPRK has since emphasized self-reliance and military preparedness, maintaining a political system led by the Workers’ Party of Korea. Successive leaders — Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, and Kim Jong Un — have prioritized economic self-sufficiency and national defense, particularly in response to ongoing sanctions and military tensions with the United States and its allies.
South Korea, for much of its postwar history, was governed by authoritarian regimes, with periods of military rule supported by the U.S. government. The transition to a more democratic political system began in the late 1980s following widespread protests, including the Gwangju Uprising of 1980, in which hundreds of civilians were killed by state forces.
Today, both Koreas remain divided politically and ideologically. The DPRK continues to operate a state-controlled socialist economy, while South Korea has developed into a major industrial democracy. The legacy of the Korean War continues to shape relations on the peninsula and remains central to regional and global security dynamics.
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.