Skip to main content

Ladakh’s discontent: A warning against alienating border communities

By Bharat Dogra
 
India shares long and sensitive borders with several neighboring countries. People living in these areas face multiple difficulties and risks. The government has recognized this and launched various programs and schemes to assist border communities. The armed forces stationed there have often extended vital help to villagers during floods, landslides, and other emergencies, saving lives and providing reassurance in times of crisis.
Beyond such practical support, a strong emotional connection with border residents is equally important. National leaders have recognized this as well. A recent statement by a villager from Uttarakhand, living close to the China border, illustrates this sentiment vividly. He said that his village was once officially called “India’s last village,” but has now been renamed “India’s first village.” This seemingly small change, he said, brought him and his neighbors great emotional strength amid their daily hardships, reinforcing their sense of belonging and pride.
While such thoughtful gestures deserve appreciation, we must also ensure that no alienation arises from insensitive statements or actions. Alienation can be easily caused through arrogance or disregard for local sentiments, but once trust is broken, rebuilding it takes great effort. Preventing alienation must therefore be an essential component of border policy.
It is in this wider context that great caution is needed regarding any statements or policy decisions related to Ladakh. Before addressing that specifically, it is useful to outline what an effective border-area policy should include to genuinely safeguard both national security and long-term stability.
Broadly, six guiding principles should shape this policy.
First, the protection of national security must remain a top priority.
Second, the government should ensure that people’s livelihoods, dignity, and cultural values are not undermined. Any action perceived as disruptive to their environment, traditions, or self-respect must be avoided.
Third, local communities should be actively involved in decision-making, so that mutual understanding can be built—balancing national security concerns with the protection of local livelihoods and culture.
Fourth, local autonomous and representative institutions should have the leading role in promoting livelihood, environmental, and cultural priorities, with adequate government financial support, as long as national security interests are not compromised.
Fifth, the government’s right to regulate or restrict foreign money and influence in border regions should be recognized and respected.
Finally, large business interests that operate arrogantly or disregard local needs should not be allowed to dominate border areas. Even when private enterprises are permitted, they must not harm local people’s interests.
If these principles are followed, alienation will not arise. Border residents will prosper, feel respected, and remain emotionally and culturally connected to the rest of the nation. Their sense of security—economic, cultural, and psychological—will strengthen their bond with India.
Where these principles are respected, national unity grows stronger. Where they are ignored, alienation sets in. This has been witnessed repeatedly, both in India and abroad.
In this light, the recent developments in Ladakh deserve serious attention. There is growing concern that some of these important principles have been disregarded, leading to discontent and possible alienation among local communities. It is crucial to engage with the people of Ladakh respectfully, and to listen carefully to their grievances, aspirations, and local leaders who enjoy public trust. Sensitivity and dialogue are essential; arrogance or misuse of authority can only deepen mistrust.
While Ladakh’s situation is particularly pressing today, these lessons hold true for all of India’s border regions.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Planet in Peril, A Day in 2071, and Man over Machine — A Path to Peace

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.