Skip to main content

A working-class voice who played major role in disseminating global labor movement

By Harsh Thakor* 
Dmitry Fyodorovich Pirozhkov, a longtime member of the Proletarskaya Gazeta editorial board and occasional editor-in-chief, passed away on June 19th at the age of 79. He was known for distributing the newspaper at a public spot near Gostiny Dvor on Nevsky Prospekt in St. Petersburg.
Pirozhkov contributed to the Russian labor movement through his work with Proletarskaya Gazeta from its founding in 1999. The newspaper, published in 46 issues, covered developments in the global labor movement, historical references, and analytical articles. He devoted significant effort to its production and dissemination.
Colleagues described him as intelligent, well-read, attentive, kind, and supportive. Even in challenging health conditions or difficult circumstances, he remained actively involved. His commitment to Marxist-Leninist principles persisted despite obstacles.
Despite his age, Pirozhkov maintained high energy levels. He readily offered advice on current topics and possessed an exceptional memory, recalling relevant classical works for articles when needed.
Two or three times a week, including weekends and after work, he distributed the newspaper and other communist literature in various weather conditions. He regularly set up a folding table with printed materials at left-wing rallies and demonstrations in Leningrad and St. Petersburg. He engaged directly with the public at these events rather than remaining in the office.
Though not physically strong in later years, his ideological resolve was steadfast. In debates with opponents, he firmly defended communist ideas and occasionally faced physical confrontations. During periods of liberal governance, he encountered frequent police interventions while challenging state policies.
Pirozhkov co-founded the newspaper with Anatoly Vasilyevich Pyzhov. It critiqued the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and its decline. Initially, they distributed various communist publications at public places and factory entrances. In 1994, with assistance from V.N. Leonov, they published the first issue of Arguments and Counterarguments in Gatchina. Proletarskaya Gazeta followed in 1999, upholding Leninist positions. After Pyzhov's death, Pirozhkov handled editing, printing, and distribution alone.
The newspaper's content was developed collaboratively: every weekend, the editorial team reviewed submissions, most written by members themselves, ensuring coherence and promotion of communist perspectives. Many ideas from earlier issues, now available online, remain relevant today. These include analyses of ongoing class struggles in the USSR from 1917 to 1991, and predictions of challenges for the European Union, drawing on Lenin's works and the Greek economic crisis in the early 2000s. Pirozhkov's broad knowledge strengthened its theoretical foundation.
The close-knit editorial process had drawbacks: a small group sometimes rejected external input, limiting the newspaper's theoretical depth and serving as a cautionary example for communist organizations.
Proletarskaya Gazeta built connections with activists across Russia and communist groups abroad, including in Germany, Greece, Turkey, India, Iran, and Canada. Editorial board members, including Pirozhkov, attended international congresses and conferences, often as Russia's sole representatives.
Pirozhkov and the board worked to pass leadership to younger activists, achieving success in this transition. Though never a CPSU member, he embodied communist principles by rejecting privileges. As geopolitical tensions escalated into armed conflict, he maintained an internationalist position and supported activists who left the Russian Communist Workers' Party (RCWP) and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (OKP) over disagreements on leadership. In recent years, he collaborated with the Russian Communist Party (International) and published their materials.
Pirozhkov represented those who, amid Russia's counterrevolutionary period, advocated for working-class empowerment and emancipation.
---
 *Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.