HC bars sale, import of GM foods sans regulatory framework: Coalition welcomes move

By A Representative

The has welcomed the order that restrains the grant of permission for sale, manufacture, distribution, or import of any genetically modified (GM) foodstuffs or edible items in India until statutory regulations are framed under of the . The court further directed that no import of any foodstuff, edible item, or packaged food be permitted unless certified and labelled as GM-free by the exporting country.

The High Court Bench, in its order dated October 13, 2025, observed that its conclusions align with the ’s on a series of public interest litigations concerning . The court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and the Union Government to frame and notify regulations on GM foods within six months.

The Coalition pointed out a major inconsistency in the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling, which mandated implementation of , related to labelling, without first enforcing Section 22 that provides the regulatory framework for ensuring food safety. The Coalition stated that implementing labelling norms without corresponding safety regulations renders the food safety law ineffective. The High Court order now directs FSSAI and the Union of India to implement Section 22 “in its true letter and spirit,” and to develop standards and safety protocols for genetically modified or engineered food within a set timeframe.

Applauding the order, the Coalition called for expanding the current FSSAI advisory on GM foods—which is non-statutory and limited to a narrow set of food categories—to include all food imports into India.

The ruling comes amid increasing pressure from the United States to allow GM products into India, reportedly influencing domestic food safety regulations. The judgment ensures that self-certification will not be accepted, requiring that only an authorised agency in the exporting country certify GM-free status for food items sent to India. The U.S. government had previously objected to FSSAI’s proposed regulations aimed at curbing the entry of processed GM foods into the Indian market.

The emphasised that no GM foodstuffs, whether domestically produced or imported—including edible oils—should reach Indian consumers without stringent legal checks, as previously warned by parliamentary committees.

Earlier, the FSSAI had denied the presence of GM ingredients in certain food products even after the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) reported in the market, despite labels from some companies themselves indicating GM content.

, representing the Coalition for a GM-Free India, stated, “The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) and FSSAI have consistently failed to fulfil their statutory mandate to ensure and food safety. The Rajasthan High Court order serves as a necessary reminder for these bodies to act responsibly and accountably. This ruling protects Indian consumers from becoming victims of external pressure from the U.S. government.”

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam* Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

Search This Blog