Genome-edited rice trials under fire: ICAR, Agriculture Ministry accused of data rigging

By A Representative

The has accused the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the of committing what it termed a “scientific fraud” in the ongoing . At a press conference today, the Coalition presented what it described as clear evidence that ICAR’s own official trial data had been manipulated to promote two genome-edited rice varieties — and DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) — as false successes.

Citing the Annual Progress Reports of ICAR’s All India Coordinated Research Project on Rice (AICRPR) for 2023 and 2024, the Coalition said the conclusions drawn in those reports directly contradict the recorded data. It accused ICAR of “rigging results and manufacturing hype” to promote unsafe and untested technologies. “As has become the habit with biotech lobbies in the country, seen earlier with and , science is yet again being compromised to push as miracle seeds, without adequate testing or data,” the Coalition said in a statement.

The group alleged that this attempt to project genome editing as a “global first” was a deliberate strategy to bypass public resistance to in food crops. “Gene editing is genetic engineering by definition, and it cannot be exempted from ,” the Coalition said, warning that such manipulations erode public trust in scientific institutions and endanger farmers’ livelihoods.

According to the Coalition, ICAR’s own reports show that Pusa DST-1, which was claimed to perform better under saline and alkaline conditions, actually yielded at par or lower than its parent in 2023, with underperformance at 12 of 20 test sites. Despite this, ICAR’s summary table claimed a 30% yield increase by selectively using data from a handful of locations. Similarly, DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala), said to yield 17% higher and mature 20 days earlier than its parent , reportedly underperformed in several zones, with missing or inconsistent data. The 2024 report, the Coalition noted, excluded data from several sites without explanation and relied on results from only six sites to justify its claims.

The Coalition said these inconsistencies amounted to deliberate manipulation. “These are not minor errors but a dangerous pattern of bad science,” said independent researcher . Activist and Coalition member called the issue one of “fundamental human rights,” arguing that flawed science in agriculture directly affects the lives of millions of farmers. “It is not to be taken lightly — how can the jumla culture be allowed to enter the scientific arena?” she said.

The Coalition urged the immediate withdrawal of all promotional claims regarding genome-edited rice, an independent review of ICAR’s trial data and methodology, and public accountability from ICAR and the Ministry of Agriculture. It also called for a moratorium on until credible biosafety regulations and are in place, with all data made public.

The group warned that “doing junk science in the name of innovation” threatens not only farmers’ health and livelihoods but also the credibility of Indian science itself.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam* Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

Search This Blog