Skip to main content

California governor faces criticism over veto of Bill protecting diaspora communities

By A Representative 
California Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision to veto Senate Bill 509, which aimed to protect residents from transnational repression by foreign governments, has sparked concern among several civil rights and diaspora groups. The bill, introduced by Senator Anna Caballero and co-authored by Assembly members Jasmeet Bains and Esmeralda Soria, was designed to safeguard activists and diaspora communities from intimidation, surveillance, and other forms of harassment orchestrated by overseas authorities. It had passed both the California Senate and Assembly with broad support.
The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy organization, voiced disappointment at the veto, calling it “a dangerous decision that leaves all Californians, from activists to everyday community members, vulnerable to repression, intimidation, and violence by foreign actors.” IAMC President Mohammed Jawad said the governor’s decision ignored “well-documented threats of violence and assassination directed against our community by the Indian government.”
The proposed legislation described transnational repression as a form of human rights violation used by some foreign governments to silence dissent and extend control over diaspora populations. It cited tactics such as extrajudicial killings, coercion of family members, online harassment, and targeted surveillance.
IAMC and other advocacy groups have previously alleged that Indian authorities have attempted to suppress dissent among expatriate communities. The organization’s report earlier this year detailed testimonies from Kashmiri and Muslim activists whose families were allegedly threatened by Indian officials and accused Indian consulates of facilitating intimidation efforts abroad.
Newsom’s veto comes amid ongoing debate over California’s approach to protecting vulnerable diaspora groups. In 2023, the governor also rejected SB403, a bill that sought to prohibit caste-based discrimination, which had similarly faced opposition from certain Hindu American groups.
IAMC said it would continue to advocate “alongside our allies for the safety and security of all Americans from transnational repression.”

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.