California governor faces criticism over veto of Bill protecting diaspora communities

By A Representative

’s decision to veto , which aimed to protect residents from by foreign governments, has sparked concern among several civil rights and . The bill, introduced by and co-authored by and , was designed to safeguard activists and diaspora communities from intimidation, surveillance, and other forms of harassment orchestrated by overseas authorities. It had passed both the California Senate and Assembly with broad support.

The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy organization, voiced disappointment at the veto, calling it “a dangerous decision that leaves all Californians, from activists to everyday community members, vulnerable to repression, intimidation, and violence by foreign actors.” said the governor’s decision ignored “well-documented threats of violence and assassination directed against our community by the .”

The proposed legislation described transnational repression as a form of human rights violation used by some foreign governments to silence dissent and extend control over diaspora populations. It cited tactics such as extrajudicial killings, coercion of family members, online harassment, and targeted surveillance.

IAMC and other advocacy groups have previously alleged that Indian authorities have attempted to suppress dissent among expatriate communities. The organization’s report earlier this year detailed testimonies from and whose families were allegedly threatened by and accused of facilitating intimidation efforts abroad.

Newsom’s veto comes amid ongoing debate over California’s approach to protecting vulnerable diaspora groups. In 2023, the governor also rejected , a bill that sought to prohibit , which had similarly faced opposition from certain .

IAMC said it would continue to advocate “alongside our allies for the safety and security of all Americans from transnational repression.”

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Counterview

Search This Blog