Skip to main content

Rutgers academic event on Hindutva draws political backlash, security concerns

By A Representative
 
An academic event at Rutgers University examining Hindu nationalism in the United States has triggered controversy and political reactions, with its organizers reporting online harassment and threats.
The October 27 discussion, titled “Hindutva in America: A Threat to Equality and Religious Pluralism,” was hosted by the university’s Center for Security, Race, and Rights (CSRR). The event explored findings from a recent report that documents what it describes as the growing influence of Hindutva-linked networks in the U.S., including their alleged role in promoting hate and intimidation.
Following the announcement of the event, Rutgers professor of South Asian history Audrey Truschke (photo) said she and fellow panelists received death threats, including one post urging that the speakers be “burned alive.” Truschke has previously faced online harassment for her criticism of Hindu nationalist politics in India.
The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington-based advocacy group, called for protection of all organizers, academics, and students involved. IAMC president Mohammed Jawad said that academic scrutiny of Hindu nationalism “is not only protected free speech but necessary to safeguard minority rights,” while emphasizing that Hinduism as a faith must not be conflated with political Hindutva ideology.
However, several lawmakers — Congress members Sanford Bishop, Suhas Subramanyam, Rich McCormick, and Shri Thanedar — criticized the event and the CSRR report, arguing that it risked “singling out Hindu Americans” and urging Rutgers to promote “diverse perspectives.”
The episode echoes earlier disputes over academic discussions of Hindutva, such as the 2021 Dismantling Global Hindutva Conference, which faced similar backlash and online abuse directed at speakers.
Scholars and human rights researchers say that conflating Hinduism with Hindutva can stifle legitimate academic inquiry and debate. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative have previously documented connections between U.S.-based Hindu nationalist organizations and far-right movements in India.
IAMC urged civic groups and universities to support Rutgers’ academic independence and the safety of its participants amid continuing online threats.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.