Skip to main content

‘No more unscientific development’: Activists warn NDMA of worsening Himalayan disasters

By Jag Jivan  
A coalition of scientists, environmentalists, and people’s organisations under the banner of People for Himalaya has submitted a detailed memorandum to the High-Powered Committee of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), urging immediate reforms to strengthen disaster governance in the Indian Himalayan Region. The submission, made on October 16, 2025—coinciding with the International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction—warned that the catastrophic monsoon events across the Himalayas this year have underscored the consequences of decades of unsustainable development and ecological neglect.
The group cited recent floods, landslides, glacial lake outburst floods, and cloudbursts that have devastated Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Ladakh, Jammu & Kashmir, and parts of the Northeast, including the recent Darjeeling landslides. These disasters, it said, have erased infrastructure, displaced communities, and exposed the region’s “acute vulnerability resulting from unscientific development, environmental degradation, and policy inattention.”
The submission called for post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA) studies to be completed without delay in all affected states. Such assessments, already underway in Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, must be initiated immediately in North Bengal and other neglected regions to ensure that rehabilitation and reconstruction are guided by evidence-based data. The group demanded that compensation and reconstruction funds be allocated impartially, based on the real extent of loss and damage, rather than through regionally uneven or politically influenced mechanisms.
To address financial and structural gaps, People for Himalaya urged the Centre to substantially increase allocations for State Disaster Response Funds (SDRF) to match the complexity of mountain risks. It also proposed the creation of a dedicated disaster mitigation and climate adaptation fund for mountain states, with strong systems for transparency and public accountability.
A major focus of the submission was the role of mega-infrastructure projects in aggravating ecological fragility. The group called for an immediate, independent review of all major projects—including highways, railways, tunnels, dams, and commercial developments—that have altered natural water flows, caused deforestation, and destabilised slopes. It demanded that projects found to increase disaster vulnerability be halted. The submission further called for strict regulation of tourism infrastructure and the inclusion of projected climate change impacts—such as intensified rainfall, flash floods, and landslides—into all planning processes.
The coalition opposed the recent amendment to the Forest Conservation Act (FCA) that allows forest clearance within 100 km of international borders, describing it as a “threat to mountain ecology.” It urged that Gram Sabha consent and biodiversity safeguards be made central to all environmental decision-making, with location-specific forest governance.
On rehabilitation, the group highlighted the difficulty of resettling displaced populations in Himalayan states, where more than two-thirds of land is legally classified as forest. This, it said, leaves landless and marginalised communities particularly vulnerable. The memorandum called for fast-tracking fair compensation, safe relocation, and livelihood restoration, while granting time-bound exemptions under forest laws for disaster-hit lands, paired with ecological restoration measures.
The submission also emphasised the need for science-based planning to prevent future disasters. It urged the strengthening of State Climate Change Cells (SCCCs) with adequate technical capacity to conduct micro-level climate vulnerability and risk mapping. It called for upgrading disaster monitoring systems, expanding rainfall and flood forecast networks under the India Meteorological Department and the Central Water Commission, and enforcing the Dam Safety Act to prevent unregulated flooding.
Finally, the group pressed for empowering local governance institutions such as Panchayats and Gram Sabhas to play a central role in disaster preparedness, response, and ecological stewardship. Integrating scientific knowledge with traditional and community-based practices, it argued, was essential for building resilience in the fragile Himalayan ecosystem.
The submission was endorsed by more than 30 organisations—including the All India Rivers Forum, Himdhara Collective, National Alliance of People’s Movements, and Citizens for Green Doon—and over 40 individuals, among them researchers, journalists, environmental activists, and social workers from across the Himalayan region and other parts of India. The memorandum concluded with a warning that without a paradigm shift placing safety, equity, and environmental integrity at the centre of policy, the Himalaya and the millions who depend on it face an increasingly perilous future.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle.