Skip to main content

How Trump is using extreme right leader's newfound Nobel status against Venezuela

By Carlos Ron
 
On Friday, 10 October 2025, Venezuela’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Samuel Moncada, delivered a serious and urgent warning during an emergency session of the Security Council, asserting that Venezuela’s peace and security —and that of the entire region— is under imminent threat of military aggression by the United States.
Hostility from Washington towards progressive governments in Caracas is not new, but the current Administration has initiated an unprecedented escalation against the government and people of Venezuela. Under the declared pretext of stepping up the war against drug-trafficking, the U.S. has deployed a significant array of military assets to the Caribbean, including destroyers, missile cruisers, F-35 fighter jets, surveillance planes, an attack submarine, over 4,000 Marines, and even a nuclear submarine. 
The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, also announced a new task force in the Caribbean, but analysts and former officials have suggested that the primary goal is to pressure the government of Nicolás Maduro and potentially pursue regime change.
The Trump Administration has shifted its focus from questioning democratic credentials to accusing Venezuelan leaders of being an international crime organization involved in drug trafficking. This narrative shift is significant, as a campaign presented as an extension of the domestic ‘war on drugs’ may garner more support from Trump’s political base than a new foreign military intervention. This focus has led to the revival of baseless criminal allegations to manufacture consent.
By August, US authorities raised to $50 million a reward for President Maduro accusing him of leading the so-called Cartel de los Soles, an alleged military-run drug cartel whose very existence has been doubted in the past even by the State Department. Likewise, an extinct prison gang known as Tren de Aragua, has been used to criminalize both Maduro and Venezuelan migrants.
The U.S. government has used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport and detain 252 Venezuelans in a high-security prison in El Salvador. Legal experts have deemed the invocation of this centuries-old, wartime law legally and morally questionable, arguing that applying it to alleged Tren de Aragua members in a non-declared war setting bypasses due process and sets a dangerous precedent. 
After negotiations with the Venezuelan government, they were eventually freed, but Venezuelans are still the target of racist and violent immigration policies. Ambassador Moncada denounced the US for continuing to detain 78 Venezuelan children, separated from their parents.
A Nobel Prize for Regime Change
A missing element for a post-regime change transition in Venezuela was an internationally credible figure to assume power. That role is now being filled by extremist opposition figure María Corina Machado. Nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, Machado’s newfound status as a Nobel Laureate is helping to reconstruct her international image as a fierce defender of democracy—despite the fact that she participated in the 2002 coup ceremony against President Hugo Chávez and signed the notorious “Carmona Decree” to dissolve all state institutions and the constitution for 48 hours.
For years, Machado headed the NGO Súmate, which faced charges of treason and conspiracy for receiving funding from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for its activities, which include the unsuccessful 2004 recall campaign against Chávez. Under the Maduro Administration, Machado consistently advocated for non-recognition of government authority, undermined the electoral system, supported U.S. sanctions on the economy, and promoted violent protests known as “guarimbas” in 2014 and 2017.
As a steadfast ally of Israel, Machado signed a cooperation agreement with Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party, and wrote to him asking for support in the U.N. Security Council for a “regime change operation” against the Venezuelan government. After the 2024 elections where she eventually backed former diplomat Edmundo González and claimed victory, her political movement refused to undergo the electoral audit carried out by the Venezuelan Supreme Court. As her popularity and leadership dwindled after months of self-imposed clandestinity, the Nobel Prize now serves as a significant boost to her international standing, coinciding with increased U.S. pressure.
From Threats to Extrajudicial Executions

Washington is clearly trying to reaffirm its dominance over Latin America in light of China’s economic and technological growth. It has lost tolerance for Venezuela’s independent foreign policy, which has strengthened not only its ties with China —both countries subscribed an ‘All-Weather’ strategic partnership in 2023— but with Russia, Iran, OPEC, and other regional partners. In Moncada’s appeal to the Security Council, he highlighted the U.S. ‘addiction to oil’ as the true reason it exerts new pressure on Venezuela, which holds the world’s largest proven reserves.
The most disturbing aspect of the escalation has been the recent U.S. military strikes against at least 4 vessels in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of 21 individuals without due process, identification, or evidence that they posed an imminent threat. Even Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro criticized these operations and suggested that some of the alleged traffickers were actually Colombian citizens. Legal analysis from organizations like the New York City Bar Association suggests these attacks are unlawful summary executions and a clear violation of international law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of life.
By not conforming to standard international practices for drug interdictions, the Trump Administration is terrorizing the Caribbean and reinforcing the view that it is after regime change in Venezuela, not drugs. The Trump Administration has declared itself as taking part in a “non-international armed conflict,” dismissing legal restraints in the use of military force.
Regime change and wars for oil come at a price. The 20-year occupation of Afghanistan ended in hundreds of thousands of deaths, a panicked retreat, and the reestablishment of previous conditions. Iraq and Libya are a long way from recovering from the destruction of recent wars, while in the U.S., veterans and their families must deal with increasing poverty, a widespread culture of violence, and a growing mental health crisis. 50 years of the War on Drugs has not eradicated consumption, but rather consolidated drug trade and distribution in all 50 states. The U.S. defeat in Vietnam is a reminder that a people determined to be free cannot be subdued. Venezuelans are determined to exercise their sovereignty, guarantee their future, and defend their peace.
---
This article was produced by BreakThrough News and Globetrotter. Carlos Ron is Co-Coordinator of the Nuestra America office of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research. He is a former Venezuelan diplomat who served as Vice Minister for North America (2018-2025)

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle.