International People’s Tribunal calls ICJ’s Gaza aid order 'too little, too late'

By A Representative

The International People’s Tribunal has described the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) recent advisory opinion ordering Israel to cooperate with the United Nations and allow aid into Gaza as “too little, too late,” criticizing what it calls the continued failure of global institutions to act decisively in the face of ongoing atrocities in Gaza.

The Tribunal, which will convene in Barcelona on November 22–23, welcomed the ICJ’s October 22 opinion requiring Israel to permit humanitarian agencies such as UNRWA to deliver aid under the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Palestinian resistance groups. The opinion follows renewed Israeli airstrikes that have killed at least 87 Palestinians and cut humanitarian aid by half. The Court also stated that Israel has used starvation as a method of war — a rare acknowledgment of the humanitarian crisis facing Gaza.

In its statement, the Tribunal argued that while the ICJ’s position marks a stronger rebuke of Israel than before, it still fails to address the deeper causes of Gaza’s devastation. “Even as the ICJ’s recent opinion goes further than it has previously against the occupying power of Israel, it still is effectively only a slap on the wrist,” said Edre Olalia, president of the International Alliance of Democratic Lawyers. He added that the decision overlooks both the environmental destruction that has rendered over 98 percent of Gaza’s farmland unusable and the Palestinian right to resist occupation under international law.

The Tribunal also pointed to Israel’s continued efforts to discredit UNRWA and other international agencies through unsubstantiated allegations of terrorist affiliations. The ICJ noted that these claims remain unproven but, given the non-binding nature of its ruling, has no authority to lift restrictions on UNRWA’s operations in Gaza.

“Occupations have never been ended through these so-called legal decisions, but rather through political movements in solidarity with the resistance and the resistance itself,” said Azra Sayeed, Secretary-General of the International League of People’s Struggle.

The International People’s Tribunal for Palestine is a civil society initiative organized by the International League of Peoples’ Struggle, the International Peoples’ Front, and the Peoples’ Coalition on Food Sovereignty, with cooperation from the International Association of Democratic Lawyers and the Palestine Land Studies Centre. The Tribunal seeks to document crimes against the Palestinian people, mobilize international solidarity, and exert moral and political pressure on complicit governments and global institutions.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam* Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle.

Search This Blog