Skip to main content

California governor must explain how caste-based discrimination is prohibited in US

The International Commission for Dalit Rights (ICDR) statement condemning California Governor’s veto of historic bill combating caste-based discrimination:
***
The International Commission for Dalit Rights (ICDR) is deeply disappointed by California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Oct 7 decision to veto SB403, a historic bill that would have explicitly clarified that caste-based discrimination is illegal in the state of California. Authored by State Senator Aisha Wahab, the bill was easily passed in both houses of the California State Legislature.
ICDR and members of the National Coalition Against Caste Discrimination, together with scholars and civil rights groups, sent a letter to Gov. Newsom on October 4, urging him to sign SB403. The letter stated that “There is much documented evidence of dominant-caste individuals in the United States excluding, exploiting, bullying, harassing and discriminating against people from marginalized castes such as Dalits in private and public settings such as employment and housing.”
Legislation like SB403 would have been a historic step forward for civil rights in California, by explicitly adding “caste” under the category of ancestry and including definitions of caste in the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Fair Employment and Housing Act, and Education Code.
In his statement, Gov. Newsom argued that SB403 was unnecessary “because discrimination based on caste is already prohibited under … existing categories.” However, we have witnessed first-hand that many victims of caste-based discrimination in the United States do not report these events because of fear of not being heard or understood by people in power, who may not be familiar with caste. Explicitly including caste in civil rights legislation would have paved a path forward for individuals facing caste-based discrimination in the state of California. We call on the Governor’s office to provide a complete legal definition of how caste-based discrimination is already prohibited under existing categories.
We are heartened to see that the movement for SB403 brought together a wide range of civil society organizations and coalitions, such as Californians for Caste Equity, Equality Labs, America Against Caste Discrimination, and the country’s leading bar associations. ICDR and the National Coalition Against Caste Discrimination are proud to have added our voices to this multi-faith, multi-racial movement committed to equity and justice for all. Fighting caste-based discrimination is not about targeting any specific religious community; this is a civil rights struggle that affects many different religious and ethnic communities. We will continue to promote the rights of Dalit and other marginalized communities in the United States and globally through advocacy, research, and leadership and community development.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”