Skip to main content

Farmer leaders call for vigilance even as they 'withdraw' from Tekri, Singhu borders

By Harsh Thakor* 

The farmers’ organisations forming the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) have been vacating themselves from the Tikri and the Singhu borders after temporarily withdrawing the agitation on receiving a letter of assurances from the ruling government at the Centre. They have decided to meet again on January 15 to assess the developing situation. They were seen exchanging sweets.
Calling it a “historic victory of farmers struggle”, the SKM, an umbrella of over 40 farm unions, announced to suspend its ongoing agitation on December 11, which, they said, marked as the nationwide victory day. In a press statement, the five member committee of the SKM said, the Union Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare had sent a letter to the organisation on December 9 morning, as per the draft approved by the SKM meeting on the previous day. “The letter was placed and approved in the SKM meeting today,” the statement said.
Maintaining that the SKM had already won its first historic victory when the Prime Minister announced the repeal of the three controversial farm laws on November 19, the statement said, “It has been decided to suspend the farmers struggle at the Delhi borders and the toll plazas from December 11… On January 15, the SKM will meet in Delhi to review the progress of the government's assurances and take further decisions as may be necessary.”
One of the top organisers of the agitation, the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU)-Ugrahan coordinator and “Surkh Leeh” editor, Pavel Kussa, mentioned how the rulers responded to farmers’ genuine demands like loan waivers and compensation, the minimum support price (MSP) and the electricity amendment Bill after a considerable delay.
Ultimately they responded in a new draft, after their first draft was rejected by the farmers. On December 7, it delivered a new letter. Previously it gave a letter on November 19, which the SKM rejected.
Pavel pointed to how the government in the new draft heeded to the demand of unconditionally withdrawing all the cases, even those in the Union territory of Delhi, which it denied previously. While the SKM gladly accepted the government view, Pavel felt the farmers should still be critical. Earlier the government made it unconditional, but now reversed that declaration.It also agreed to form a committee, which includes SKM leaders, to deal with all aspect of MSP.
However, felt Pavel, it does not give a legal guarantee. Another important aspect is the electricity amendment Bill, which the rulers pledged to withdraw. Pavel spoke about how it did not only concern the farmers, but broad sections of people as the whole. The government has agreed to discuss it with all the stakeholders.
The government has lifted penalties on the farmers unconditionally and offered compensation to farmers. However, Pavel said, there were sections which were still trapped with penalties. He stressed on how the farmers must be vigilant of all government promises and morally sustain the struggle and unity. Not even for a day should the people dilute the pressure.
He reflected on why new forms should be devised to undertake the struggle. In his view, priority must be given for compensation to the Lakhimpur Kheri victims and punishment to the culprits, asserting, while all the aspects were addressed, these were done keeping in view convenience of the rulers, and not with the perspective of the progress of the farmers. Pavel also spoke about how the rulers still danced in tune with the corporates, and by no means should the people place blind faith in them.
Earlier, speaking at the Jawaharlal Nehru University campus, Pavel classified three categories into which the farmers’ frustrations was being channelized. The first one belonged to the group of Hindutva criminalization and pro-Modi, the second resorted to suicides, and the third relentlessly waged battle to confront the "neo-fascist" BJP.
Pavel said how mercilessly land was seized by the corporate, landlords and jagirdars with the collaboration of moneylenders, revealing, 32 percent of Punjab’s population constituted landless Dalits and 70 percent of the landed peasantry in the last three decades had turned landless.
In his view the first achievement of the one year long struggle was the scrapping of the three farm laws. It was significant that it united the democratic forces of the whole nation, involving all the basic classes, projecting secular politics. Maintaining a secular colour refuting all communal trends, was most commendable.
The second achievement was, polarization was created at an unprecedented level between the corporates and the farmers. Farmers’ resistance reached a new height during the recent agitation, embarrassing the corporates and the ruling classes in their very backyard.
The seeds of such resistance, according to him, were sown in the struggles waged by the farmers of Punjab over the last three decades. The issues of usury, scrapping of debts and confronting land capture were initiated in a most sustained manner.
A major achievement of the agitation was polarization was created at an unprecedented level between the corporates and the farmers
Pavel stated that it was vital that ruling class politicians must be cut at their very base. In his view no politician or political party must be allowed to seize the stage to rob or divert movements. He recounted how in many an instance an ongoing movement was derailed as a consequence of political parties capturing it.
He pointed out how the farmers of Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh faced similar problems and it was not a problem of Punjab alone. However, he added, it was the Punjab farmers who formed the fulcrum of the movement.
In an interview, Joginder Singh Ugrahan, leader of BKU (Ugrahan) noted how the rulers were embarrassed in their very backyard and were compelled to withdraw the three farm laws. He said that the withdrawal of the laws was only the first part of a long fight for democracy in the country. In spite of a constant ebb and flow in fortunes the Modi government was even today determined to destroy this farmers’ movement.
Ugrahan recalled the government tried to hatch a a conspiracy on January 26, by branding farmers as separatist Sikhs. However, they they remained unflinched and united in spite of the loss of over 700 lives. The Lakhimpur Kheri killings and then the killing of a poor man at the hands of a Nihang leader was also part of a broader BJP conspiracy to derail the movement, but the spirited resistance from people all over India thwarted it.
Ugrahan highlighted how it was not just the BJP that had to be confronted, but the ideology of Hindutva nationalism as a whole. Whether in Punjab, Uttar Pradesh or Uttarakhand, or anywhere else in India, the withdrawal of these laws should not mean ascendancy for the BJP.
In this context, he mentioned “anti-people decisions” by the BJP since it came to power in 2014, like demonetisation, the annulment of Article 370, the land acquisition law, the NRC and CAA. These need to be discussed and opposed, he said.
Ugrahan reflected on how the level of debate recently escalated by volumes. Parties who earlier used to announce sops and lure the masses with their appeal for votes now faced tough questions from the people, like what plan or model the parties have to adopt for employment generation and the fate of key sectors like education and healthcare. Targeting the corporate lobbies in these debates is another achievement of the farmers’ movement.
Ugrahan said it was necessary to confront the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that governed state policies by favouring monopoly of the corporates. He added, however, there was limited scope of opposition parties to challenge WTO mandates about the corporatising of agriculture -- which was a virtual manifestation of the three farm laws.
According to him, no single political party ruling in any State at present has projected any alternative with which it could confront the Centre’s policies. Thus there was no point talking about more powers to States until we have a model at hand for such a demand. He reminded those who raised the Anandpur Sahib resolution that they should not talk about it.
---
*Freelance journalist who has toured India, particularly Punjab, has written on mass movements

Comments

TRENDING

North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By Our Representative  A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur. The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order. The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization

Majoritarian silence helping Hindutva forces 'handover' national resources to corporates

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The majority of Indian citizens are witnessing the persecution and everyday violence against their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities. The growing assaults on reason, science, secularism, Indian democracy and constitution are going to be landmarks in Indian history of diminishing democracy and citizenship rights. It is clear that Hindutva ideology is directly promoting sectarian politics of hate which is dangerous for the unity and integrity of India, peace and prosperity of Indians. The majoritarian silence helps in empowering Hindutva and their electoral dividends. From witnessing the persecution in the sidelines to the active participation and cheering loud or silence accelerates violence against our neighbours and our fellow citizens. How and why do majority of Indians stay silent and contribute to the persecution of their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities? The question baffles me as an Indian because I have gr

Electricity Bill: Centre's reform measures contain 'carrot and stick package' for states

Counterview Desk  The Peoples’ Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPSPS), claiming to be a network of eminent academics, jurists, erstwhile administrators, trade unionists and social activists, seeking consultations with stakeholders with those who are against the government’s decision to monetise, disinvest and privatise public assets/enterprises, has said that the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill-2022 will have far-reaching impacts on the finances of states. Insisting that the proposed Bill would lead to “assault on India’s federal structure”, in a statement, it says, it would weaken the finances of states’ power distribution companies, have adverse impact on utility employees, cripple the states' finances, impose a heavy cost burden on the smaller subsidized consumers (especially farmers), and benefit only corporate business houses. “States cannot afford to ignore the far-reaching implications of the Bill on their economy, finances, agricultural and industria

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in