Skip to main content

Did RSS leaders, wearing nationalism badge, betray India's freedom movement?

RSS leaders in 1939
By Masidur Rahaman* 

India’s history of anti-British struggle is glorious, with flowering youths accepting gallows, facing bullets, spurning a so-called comfortable life, women gathering on the streets and many boycotting promising jobs offered to them. Their one and only aim? To free India from the British stranglehold. 
Almost 200 years of British captivity resulted in immense economic plunder, inexplicable repression and pauperisation of the Indian people. During this period, each and every sensible person and organisation tried her and his bit to free the nation. They dreamt of a free India.
More than 70 years have passed since India gained its freedom on August 15, 1947, and so many changes are visible in Indian politics. The year 2014 celebrated the victory of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi who came to power with a thumping majority. Critics and political analysts see his ascension to the chair of Prime Minister due to his strong association with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right extremist fringe Hindu outfit.
RSS is said to be the parent organisation of BJP, the political party to which Narendra Modi belongs. RSS and BJP leaders are often seen championing themselves as true nationalists and patriots. Their every activity is touched by the concept of ‘nationalism’. But history tells us something else about them.
People belonging to this outfit, wearing badges of nationalism, actually betrayed the Indian freedom movement. There are countless examples in this regard which expose the dubious role of RSS during the Indian freedom struggle.
At a time when the entire nation stood united against the British imperialists to realise their dream of making India free of British hold, RSS not only opposed the Indian freedom movements but announced its allegiance to the Britishers calling the anti-British freedom fighters reactionary as well as non-patriotic.
Before killing innocent people under the pretext of teaching them a lesson on nationalism, they should ask themselves why their forefathers maintained a distance from taking part in freedom movements.

RSS’ objectives

RSS was founded in 1925 by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, a doctor in the city of Nagpur, British India. After founding RSS, Hedgewar kept this outfit away from participating in any anti-British movements. He never wanted to face the wrath of the Britishers for that could have posed a serious threat to the existence of the outfit.
A prominent biographer of Hedgewar writes: “After establishing Sangh, Doctor Saheb in his speeches used to talk only of Hindu organization. Direct comment on Government used to be almost nil” (Bhishikar, CP [1994]. “Sangh Vriksh ke Beej: Dr. Keshav Rao Hedgewar”, New Delhi: Suruchi Prakashan).
Hedgewar directly rejected the urges of the Congress under the leadership of Gandhiji to fight the Britishers. He was of the view that…
“the Hindu culture is the life-breath of Hindustan. It is therefore clear that if Hindustan is to be protected, we first nourish the Hindu culture. If the Hindu culture perishes in Hindustan itself, and if the Hindu society ceases to exist, it will hardly be appropriate to refer to the mere geographical entity that remains as Hindustan. Mere geographical lumps do not make a nation. Unfortunately, the Congress organization has given no thought to protecting the Hindu Dharma and Hindu culture. The organization keeps its eyes closed to the daily onslaughts by outsiders on the Hindu society” (“Religious Dimensions of Indian Nationalism: A Study of RSS” by Shamsul Islam).
Repeated utterings of the words “Hindustan and Hindu Dharma and Hindu culture” speak for themselves. He was more interested in making this nation a Hindu Rastra than revolting against the Britishers.

RSS leaders

MS Golwalkar took over the leadership of RSS after Hedgewar passed away. He outrightly amplified his and RSS’ views on nationalism by saying, “Hindus, don’t waste your energy fighting the British. Save your energy to fight our internal enemies that are Muslims, Christians, and Communists.” 
He actively supported Hindu nationalism born out of the extremist Hindutva concept that sought to see the non-Hindus in India as second class citizens. He explained his version of Hindu Nationalism in his book ‘We Or Our Nationhood Defined’ in this way:
“…foreign races in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture, i.e. of the Hindu nation and must lose their separate existence to merge in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment not even citizen’s rights.”
This extract from his book bears testimony to the fact that how much hatred he used to hold for those who don’t profess Hinduism.
At a time, when the entire world branded Hitler as the worst enemy of humankind, M.S. Golwalkar showered words of praise saying, “Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic races – the Jews.” The RSS kept itself away from taking part in Quit India Movement in 1942. It not only mocked and opposed those participating in this mass struggle but urged the British government to resist the movement as soon as possible with an iron fist.
Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee was a prominent Right-Wing firebrand who is often shown by the ruling BJP as an avowed worshipper of Mother India. He wrote a letter dated July 26, 1942, to the British Governor of Bengal, as the deputy chief minister in the Muslim League ministry of Bengal in which he said:
“Let me now refer to the situation that may be created in the province as a result of any widespread movement launched by the Congress. Anybody, who during the war, plans to stir up mass feeling, resulting in internal disturbances or insecurity, must be resisted by any Government that may function for the time being.”
VD Savarkar began his political career as a revolutionary who advocated for an inclusive India free of any sort of discrimination. But I feel that his mind underwent severe psychological transformation while he was in Cellular Jail in 1911. He wrote five consecutive petitions to the British government asking for forgiveness and his immediate release from the jail.
He assured that once released, he would withdraw himself from taking part in any sort of activity or movement that might pose a serious threat to the existence of the British rule in India. After he was released, he took over the leadership of Hindu Mahasabha. He played an active role in the formation of RSS. Hedgewar took advice from Savarkar before establishing RSS.
Savarkar too distanced himself and his organisation from Indian Freedom Movements. After a meeting with Savarkar, Lord Linlithgow, the then viceroy of India wrote to the then Secretary of State for India:
“The situation, he (Savarkar) said, was that his Majesty’s government must now turn to the Hindus and work with their support… Our interests were now the same and we must, therefore, work together… Our interests are solely so closely bound together, the essential thing is for Hinduism and Great Britain to be friends and the old antagonism was no longer necessary.”

Dishonoring Tricolour

Top leaders of RSS may go to various events to unfurl the Tricolour to demonstrate their nationalism. I am of the opinion that the RSS always denigrated and disrespected the Tricolour. Golwalkar used to say that it is the saffron flag that is the national flag of Hindustan and not the Tricolour.
‘Organiser‘, the English-language organ of RSS on August 14, 1947 while showing disrespect to the Tricolour wrote:
“The people who have come to power by the kick of fate may give in our hands the Tricolour but it never be respected and owned by Hindus. The word three is in itself an evil, and a flag having three colours will certainly produce a very bad psychological effect and is injurious to a country.”
The RSS, now projecting itself as an organisation of the nationalists and patriots, thus has an infamous past of betraying the revered freedom fighters. I strongly feel that it is very shameful, that with the rise of the BJP to power at centre, RSS is seen as a patriotic organisation.
Prominent rationalists from M M Kalburgi to Gauri Lankesh were murdered brutally because people carrying ideology similar to the RSS felt that they had insulted their religion. This too again speaks for itself. RSS along with other outfits that bear almost the same sort of ideology want to muzzle voices of dissent and most importantly have vowed to silence those voices that always advocate for rationalism.
---
*Graduate in English literature from the University of Kalyani; interests include politics, national and international affairs, gender based violence and women's issues

Comments

TRENDING

North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By Our Representative  A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur. The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order. The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization

Majoritarian silence helping Hindutva forces 'handover' national resources to corporates

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The majority of Indian citizens are witnessing the persecution and everyday violence against their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities. The growing assaults on reason, science, secularism, Indian democracy and constitution are going to be landmarks in Indian history of diminishing democracy and citizenship rights. It is clear that Hindutva ideology is directly promoting sectarian politics of hate which is dangerous for the unity and integrity of India, peace and prosperity of Indians. The majoritarian silence helps in empowering Hindutva and their electoral dividends. From witnessing the persecution in the sidelines to the active participation and cheering loud or silence accelerates violence against our neighbours and our fellow citizens. How and why do majority of Indians stay silent and contribute to the persecution of their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities? The question baffles me as an Indian because I have gr

Electricity Bill: Centre's reform measures contain 'carrot and stick package' for states

Counterview Desk  The Peoples’ Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPSPS), claiming to be a network of eminent academics, jurists, erstwhile administrators, trade unionists and social activists, seeking consultations with stakeholders with those who are against the government’s decision to monetise, disinvest and privatise public assets/enterprises, has said that the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill-2022 will have far-reaching impacts on the finances of states. Insisting that the proposed Bill would lead to “assault on India’s federal structure”, in a statement, it says, it would weaken the finances of states’ power distribution companies, have adverse impact on utility employees, cripple the states' finances, impose a heavy cost burden on the smaller subsidized consumers (especially farmers), and benefit only corporate business houses. “States cannot afford to ignore the far-reaching implications of the Bill on their economy, finances, agricultural and industria

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in