Skip to main content

Restricting use of public places for religious purpose: Will Gehlot govt respect HC order?

By Kavita Srivastava* 

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Rajasthan, has welcomed the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing the petition by Pooja Gurnani which challenged a circular of the Rajasthan government which restrained the construction of a ‘Pooja Sthal’ in the premises of a police station.
The judgment delivered by Chief Justice Akil Kureshi and Justice Rekha Borana upheld the right of the state to maintain public places as secular places in accordance with the mandate of the Rajasthan Religious Building and Places Act, 1954 which was meant to ‘restrict the use of public places for religious purposes’.
The petitioner by challenging the constitutionality of the circular issued under the Act was in effect saying that the state had no power to ensure that its organs and instrumentalities, including the police functioned in accordance with the Preambular mandate of secularism.
The insidious agenda of the petitioner was to legitimize and promote the conversion of public places like police stations into places which offer worship to deities from one religion alone, thereby making a mockery of the promise of non-discrimination on grounds of religion. This would have been a direct affront to the idea of Indian as a secular democracy which is founded on the values of the Constitution.
By dismissing the petition the Court has in effect upheld the power of the state to ensure that India remains a constitutional democracy rather than become a majoritarian democracy.
The PUCL hopes that the Gehlot government continues to fulfill its constitutional mandate without fear and favour and upholds the secular vision encoded in the Preamble.
---
*President, People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Rajasthan

Comments

  1. A great decision.....
    more like this one and India might be coming back on the correct track....
    bernardk

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.