Skip to main content

PUCL warns against using Chhattisgarh tragedy for further militarisation of Bastar

By A Representative 

India's well-known human rights organisation, the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), while condemning the "heavy loss of lives in the encounter between Maoists and security forces in Chhattisgarh", has appealed to all political parties to "maintain calm", insisting, it is time to "bring an end to all hostilities."
A statement signed by PUCL president Ravi Kiran Jain and general secretary Dr V Suresh, the top rights body, founded by Jayaprakash Narayan and VM Tarkunde, said it is not just the loss of life of 22 security personnel in the encounter on April 3 in forests near Jonaguda village in Sukma along the road connecting Bijapur-Sukma districts that is cause of concern, but also that "injured security people seeking refuge in houses were ambushed and stabbed to death."
According to PUCL, "Such use of violence against injured persons – irrespective of whether they are security persons or others – is unacceptable", adding, "This goes against the principles of humanitarian law, which is enshrined in national and international law, governing the basic rights of combatants in any conflict situation."
PUCL said, acting on intelligence to input that Naxalite leader Hidma was present in forests within the jurisdiction of Tarrem PS, a massive team of over 2,000 police and paramilitary troops from five different camps and stations in the districts of Sukma and Bijapur had been dispatched for searching operations in the area.
This team was returning on April 3, when it was ambushed by Maoists, and a three hour long pitched gun battle ensued, in which at least 22 security personnel and 12 Maoists, including a woman, were killed, 32 soldiers were injured and one went missing.
Rejecting the use of violence for "furthering political and strategic ends", PUCL, however, said, "The Maoist violence in Central India needs to be addressed through political means, and not military operations."
Asking political parties , State and Central governments and the security forces, as also Maoists, to "immediately cease military operations", it insisted, it is necessary to end "all other hostilities in order to initiate a process of dialogue to resolve all conflict issues."
According to PUCL, the encounter not only comes at a time of "escalating violence in Bastar due to the continuing insurgency and counter-insurgency operations", there is also an "extensive militarization of the area resulting in the daily harassment of ordinary citizens by paramilitary forces due to the setting up of camps at short distances."
Poi bynting out that this has caused "alienation of local tribals, who are caught in the middle of the conflict between the security forces and the Maoists", PUCL said, as a result, "In the past few months, there has been an alarming rise in the number of civilians killed."
Asserting that at the heart of the conflict that has engulfed the tribal areas of Bastar "are issues about the nature of development, expansion of industries and mines, all of which threaten to displace and dispossess millions of Adivasis", PUCL warned, "Using the current tragedy for further militarization in Bastar, which is already amongst the most militarized areas in the world, is a surefire recipe for disaster."
It said, "Peace can come not through military camps and military style operations. It can come only when both the state and its forces and the Maoists acknowledge the primacy of Adivasis communities and initiate a genuine dialogue between them and with the local populations about the nature and direction of state-sponsored development in the area."

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”