Skip to main content

Why are national, global issues a domain of only a Gupta, Sharma, Jha or a Mishra?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 

Every year various magazines, online portals and newspapers bring out a list of ‘powerful’ people for our consumption. These are brought out on particular occasions after being “judged’ by a few “selected” or “knowledgeable” people who go through the work and achievements of such people during the year in order to come to a conclusion.
The history of ‘powerful’ people of the world actually started with “Time” and “Newsweek” magazines. Most of their writers have been western commentators. Indian commentators till now hardly contributed to such an exercise. But things are beginning to change, as various Indian commentators and experts have found their way in doing such an exercise. Many a time one is surprised with several of their inclusions and exclusions.
Indeed, the fever has lately caught up in India. This year’s “Indian Express” list of the most powerful Indians appeared biased, perhaps a deliberate attempt to denigrate the Gandhis. It looks as if the newspaper decided to play the game for the BJP. There is reason to believe that this way a ‘liberal’ looking media is proving to be more dangerous than the likes of Arnab Goswami and the Republic TV.
Indeed, liberals do not counter the legitimacy of the Brahmanical classes. They just try to defend the existing superstructure by diverting issues by givinga different ‘angle’. Except for making the ‘powerful’ happy and ‘building’ up a few new ‘brands’, these lists are nothing but an exercise to keep the ‘audiences’ and the ‘readers’ glued to the media so that they too have a feeling of ‘inclusion’.
Most of these ‘lists’ are actually the ‘vision’ of ‘intellectuals’, but TV channels often resort to this exercise by asking people to vote. A few years back, CNN-IBN started voting for the ‘Greatest Indian’. They carefully did not bring Gandhiji into the picture. The ‘fight’ was between Jawaharlal Nehru and Baba Saheb Ambedkar.
In the final count of votes, Dr Ambedkar won with heavy margins. Gandhi was not a “participant”. That is how the Brahmanical elite manipulates things. They try to project Gandhi as the topmost icon, who is ‘unquestionable’, though allowing people to vote for Ambedkar and Nehru.
Time and again, these magazines change their tactics to look ‘progressive’ and ‘inclusive’. But these changes correspond to the political situation in the country. They provide a feeling that they ‘care’ for the marginalised. After the Mandal Commission report, most of the newspapers vehemently opposed OBC reservation, yet some Hindi papers started giving space to Dalit-Ambedkarite writers. “Pioneer” provided a column to Chandra Bhan Prasad on Sundays exclusively on Dalit issues.
More recently, “The Indian Express” asked Suraj Yengde to curate a column on caste-race matters. After the death of Rohith Vemula many newspapers published stories and personal narratives of ‘Dalits’, a clever way to confine such writers to Dalit issues alone, without realising that there are extraordinary people who can write on any subject. The Brahmanical media, however, wants to limit them to the Dalit identity. As it is an issue of visibility, many become prey to such tactics.
Indeed, as Dalit middle classes grow, the media and other spaces will be made available to them – not to challenge the Brahmanical hegemony but put them in a separate ‘Dalit’ cell, like the political parties do. They would be called to speak or write on when particular issues of Dalits arise, as if they don’t understand or know any other national or ‘international issues’, which are a clear domain of a Guptaji, a Sharmaji, a Jha saheb or a Mishraji.
The Brahmanical media wants to limit Ambedkarite scholars to their Dalit identity. As it is an issue of visibility, many become prey to such tactics
Yet, the fact is that Ambedkarism has been the ideology which India’s ruling castes have always seen with suspicion, denying it a space. It grew up because of dedicated Ambedkarites and their groundwork. Today, we few rememberspirited legends such as Advocate Bhagwan Das, LR Balley, VT Rajsekhar, K Jamanadas, Raja Dhale, JV Pawar, Sadanand Fulzale, Bojha Tarkam, NG Uke, Vijay Surwade, Manohar Mauli Vishwas, Baby Tai Kamble, Shanta Bai Dane, Kumud Pawade and others, who kept the spirit of Ambedkarism high and flying. Most of these legends never got an opportunity to air their views in the so-called ‘national’ media.
In fact, person like VT Rajshekar started “Dalit Voice” after resigning from “The Indian Express” in the 1980s while LR Balley started “Bhim Patrika” to carry forward the mission after the demise of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar in 1956. Bhagwan Dass compiled the work of Baba Saheb and brought collected works of Dr Ambedkar. There were numerous magazines and journals in various parts of the country which were being run in the name of Ambedkarism, not necessarily on Bahujan issues.
VT Rajshekar used to call ‘national media’ as India’s ‘national toilet papers’. We grew up admiring him, though many of felt that isolation cannot help the Dalit cause. Yet, it is a fact that the Ambedkarite literature and power grew without getting legitimacy from the Brahmanical elite. That is why late Kanshiram was extraordinary as he never went to get a ‘certificate’ from these ‘manuwadi’ media and politicians.
In recent years, “Round Table India” has done tremendous work to provide space to aspiring Ambedkarite Bahujan scholars allowing them to make a niche for themselves without any certification from the ‘intellectual’ elite of the country. Can we ignore the phenomenal work done by Lokmitra through Trailokya Baudh Mahasangha and Nagaloka and his dedicated team of activists such as Mangesh Dahiwale and Priyadarshi Telang?
My friend in Odisha, Manas Jena, has been writing a regular column for “Pioneer” for many years and it is a well-received column. Another friend Dr Goldy M George has been contributing through not only ground work of the Dalit Mukti Morcha but regularly writing thought-provoking issues. Of course, Brahmanical media fear independent and assertive Ambedkarites.
However, the fact is, not all who are being ‘projected’ as Dalit icons or heroes are Ambedkarites. Two years back, American media as well as many in India ‘celebrated’ the ‘autobiographical’ work of an expatriate Indian in America. It was hailed as a landmark book. The fact was, while the book shared the author’s own experiences and that of her uncle who happened to be part of the ‘revolutionary’ movement, the author actually despised Ambedkarites and Ambedkarism, as she came from the ‘left’ background.
If the Dalit movement is acknowledged world over today and respected, it is because of Dr Ambedkar’s monumental work and guidance to the people as well as the dedicated work of Ambedkarites. Travel to the United Kingdom, and you will find how Santosh Dass, Gautam Chakrawarty, Arun Kumar, Devinder Chander and others have kept the flag of Ambedkarism high. They don’t run ‘professional’ organisations, nor are they attached to any ‘university’, but with their work with the community they have kept the Ambedkarite movement in the northern hemisphere alive.
While the dominant media and individuals are free to bring out their list every year, or perhaps once in a while, I can also provide some suggestions, and friends can work on that. We can have a list of powerful 100 Indians in the service of Brahmanism. This list can have some Dalit, OBC, Muslim, Christian, Adivasi names too. And there can also be a list of 50 non-Dalit Ambedkarites, 100 Ambedkarites in the service of humanity – including in literature, social work, journalism.
Any takers for my suggestions?
---
*Human rights defender. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat, twitter: at @freetohumanity, skype: @vbrawat

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.