Skip to main content

Misuse of position: Will President, Supreme Court, Election Commission keep a check?

By Mansee Bal Bhargava* 
Open letter to President, Supreme Court, and Election Commission of India:
Greetings! 
Keeping my hope on the three institutions despite all the speculations raised on their integrity, I write this letter with an earnest request to help the ordinary citizens of India understand the meanings of symbols-statesmanship at a position and in profession. Personally, following the political activities of India closely over three decades, it is realized that some things are changing faster than the citizens can easily comprehend, an important one being the Symbols of Statesmanship at a position and in profession.
It is relieving that the Bengal elections are over (finally). Never have we seen this high-octane drama in the elections (like in Bengal) especially in the election campaigns since the 2013, but the recent Bengal campaign is just unimaginable. Keeping aside the election campaigns relationship with the surge in Covid cases, the focus (concern) is about the withering of the symbols of statesmanship at a position and in profession.
There are few questions that pertain to answer to my students' queries while trying to explain them the fact that the government and the politics are two separate entities; and that those are related only through some institutional framework where individuals (from politics) at certain position in government can/may perform certain roles and responsibilities with the assigned profession.
The case of Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, aka the star political campaigner of the elections since 2013, is assessed to frame the queries. Just to clarify, the same queries apply to the Chief Ministers or even the other Ministers like the Home Minister of the country. Since, the West Bengal election seems to be extremely crucial to the PM and also since the campaigns showcased the epitome of withering of the symbols of statesmanship at a position and in profession. 
The very notion of PM, as an institution, seems to be subjugated by an individual. Emancipating a dignified Institution like the PM, by an Individual is a bit unclear especially during the election campaigns which have become an everyday event nowadays hopping from one state to the other; but clear enough to realize that something is messed up about the position and the profession.
First, is the use of the Symbol of the Government of India (or the State Government in case of CM) or a political party during the election campaigns. It is also observed that several ministers appear on media as Central ministers with the political party logo at the background. This isn’t correct since they respond as X-minister of the Government of India and therefore must use the GoI institutional logo (Ashoka Lions).
If a PM/CM/HM is campaigning for a state/national election, in what capacity that individual is campaigning? Is the individual campaigning at the behest of the position held or otherwise as professional politician? If the former, then being a government servant should the individual carry the institutional logo to go campaign for a political party? If the latter, then as a political party worker, the individual may indeed use the party logo but, then can the individual exercise all the institutional benefits of a PM/CM/HM? Both options seem problematic despite knowing that the logo of a political party is being used, rightfully so, during the election campaigns.
Well, I could not fish out clear answers to the two alternatives, but the logo being just a symbolic query, extends to the use of institutional machineries like travel, security, working hours and even the title/position for the election campaigns and goes further to the dignity of the position and statesmanship. 
When a PM/CM/HM is an institution to carry out certain roles and responsibilities, how the institutional prerogatives can be subjugated by an individual holding that position towards benefiting a political party? Morally right question is, should a position holding individual like PM/CM/HM be allowed to campaign and then should they be allowed to exploit the institutional set up?
A simple example is a judge/commissioner/ collector/ government officer using office vehicles-driver-fuel for family outing in the off or office hours which is such a normal practice in India that we don’t even find it wrong anymore, so considering it unlawful is farfetched. Similarly, if an individual engages in the election campaigns in the off or office hours, is the individual entitled to all the institutional facilities including the use of the title of the position like, the PM/CM/HM?
Shouldn’t the campaigning individual in the latter situation use the party machinery? Shouldn’t the use of institutional facilities to promote a party be unlawful activity? Since, a PM/CM/HM is provided with position and facilities from the ALL peoples money, which needs to be used when on duty to perform the roles and responsibilities towards all the citizens. Logically, an election campaign is Not A Duty of a PM/CM/HM towards the citizenry.
It is observed that Modi visited the State of West Bengal several times since the beginning of the year for the election campaigns and has exploited all the institutional machinery as a PM but for promoting a political party. It is also observed from time to time that the PM has denied his party’s motto of electioneering; however, the memes of the star campaigner being called a PM of the party instead of the country is also extensively circulated. 
Though he shifted to the virtual rally in the last few days only after the Covid positive cases crossed two lakh per day, his allies continued rallies on the ground even until the last day. His face is all over in every nook and corner of Bengal, making it look like a PM competing for a CM position.
This gets grave especially during this severe Covid crisis when the PM, instead of taking cognizance of the situation and fulfilling his roles and responsibilities, was fiercely batting/betting for the Bengal election. In fact, he and the other political leaders were even breaking the Covid protocols of social distancing left, right and centre at the time when police was getting brutal with the citizens on the protocols.
How do we expect that the citizens will follow the rules when leaders continue to break them openly? This is just an example, which can be exemplified in others matters also from corruption to carnage. I wish the President of India, the Supreme Court, and the Election Commission had stepped in the picture to curb the state elections and the allied massive election campaigns before the rising Corona distress by taking some insights from the intelligence office.
Anyway, it gets graver with the notion of alienation of a state from the country in the election campaign rhetoric. For example, when a PM raises the problems (rightfully) of a state, be it Covid or Unemployment or Infrastructure or Infiltration (as used in the campaign speeches), and promises to solve them once in power in the state, it sounds technically incorrect. 
Since, if things are not going right in a state, it is as much a responsibility of a PM of the country as it is of the CM of the state. Similarly, resounding the border insecurity during the state elections (only) is technically incorrect, since it is a national matter and joint responsibility of these government employees PM-CM-HM in position.
Linking the same to the Covid crisis, in what capacity a political leader can promise free vaccination? Just to remind this rhetoric has been used more often than it should be for example, also in Bihar 2020 election. If it is a political Jumla, then what is the extent of political Jumla? Will the President of India, the Supreme Court, and the Election Commission set some stringent rules of rhetoric linked to humanity? Since, such promises are not only inhuman to play with the emotions and the life of the people but also hostile according to the law of the land.
Coming back to the promise of free vaccination, is the Individual promising free vaccine at the expense of the political party or at the expense of the Institution of the Government of India? If the latter, then the scheme must be for pan India and not limited to Bengal again as per the law of the land. Ironically, neither Biharis got free vaccination in 2020, nor the Bengalis will get in 2021, no matter who reign Bengal. 
In fact, the vaccines are set to be sold on higher prices to the States (barring a few who plan to do free vaccination) because of the poor vaccination policies of the central government (click here and here). Although Bengal seems to roll on free vaccination from May 1, 2021 but that is the decision of the current CM, Mamata Banerjee, after the Central government left the States to be #Atmanirbhar after a year of Central control of corona leading us to this chaos.
My symbolic query further extends that if electioneering by a PM/CM/HM position holding individual is an accepted culture here, then it is also expected from those to maintain the statesmanship. The ‘Didi-o-Didi...’ remark by an individual (man) is something not surprising in a patriarchal society of India as it sounded like a young (bad) guy eve teasing girls/women in the public space.
However, this is indeed not expected from an institution like the PM in a country where there are dozens of schemes for women empowerment in order to raise the dignity of the women in the country. In a country that is extremely poor in women leadership, such kind of remarks are sarcastic as well as demotivating since a woman will have difficulty stooping so low as a man in the country. But then by position and profession, the PM/CM/HM must maintain the dignity of the institutions they represent.
The way the men are clouding and howling in Bengal, it is extremely intimidating for women to stand up in political endeavors. And I’ll even fear that the younger women observing such ugly drama may not chose to (or not dare to) take up political leaderships. Is that what we want in the country after years of men ruling us to devastations like we are going through in all aspects let alone corona. You may like to check with the global rankings of the country in various aspects including women unemployment, domestic violence, rape and subjugation of the political leadership.
One may put the onus of this misrepresentation of the institutions and the individuals to the rise of the various media forms including the social media where journalists and citizens (including the politicians) are exercising use of words more casually than the meanings (depth) of these words thus resulting in misleading of the Symbols-Statesmanship of a Position and Profession in the perception of the mass.
If the media is misinterpreting the position and the profession by misquoting PM instead of quoting Modi when writing about the election campaigns with the party logo? The same media should also clarify when they call a minister to talk about any matter, as in what capacity an individual is talking-personal or institutional/minister. It is difficult to realize that the media is unaware about this distinction between the institution and an individual, the government and the politics.
The least a position holding individual can do when there is such a huge opportunity to reach the ground is to listen to peoples’ needs
It is also difficult to accept that the political leaders are unaware of these distinctions. It is understandable that the most citizens make no distinction between the government and the politics. The larger impact of such casual narratives is evident from that the fact that Bharat Sarkar is narrated mostly as Modi Sarkar not only by its political party but by the media and even by several government organizations including the courts and even the President’s office. This casual misrepresentation by all starts further stooping in electioneering with words, works and worth, for example, from “Hamari Sarkar” to “Meri Sarkar to I, Me, Myself.”
Finally, please also note that we are unfortunately pushed to a continuous state of election by the political parties augmented with the ugly media that rages a sense of tension, violence, aggression bringing more unrest in the society instead of good health and happiness which seems to have disappeared from the election agenda. Ironically, things have gone so far in elections, that individuals holding positions are imagining the party and even the person to be the country and vice versa, which is incorrect by all means.
The institutions seem compromised by the individuals in the electioneering process. One may defend it as reaching to the ground level is part of the profession. Fine, it is acceptable but, then the position is meant to make use of that opportunity to serve directly the society with promoting the institutional facilities instead of using rhetoric and threatened narratives of the state of affairs and making some irresponsible promises like free food, electricity and now even free vaccine.
The least a position holding individual can do when there is such a huge opportunity to reach the ground, is to listen to the peoples’ needs than imposing people to listen. The cost of narcissism in Bengal electioneering is what we are paying with the Covid upsurge as we are challenged more by the poor governance than the virus itself.
I have made my point going round-round the matter to enquire about the symbolic logo in order to emphasize as we usually do in teaching using various examples so that the students get a clearer picture. In nutshell, it is important that when the government and the politics are technically two different entities, they need to be distinguished by the institutions as well as the individuals.
If an individual position holder is unable to understand or maintain this distinction (dignity) of the institution, it is the other constitutional pillars like the President of India, the Supreme Court, and the Election Commission duty to ensure that the symbol and the statesmanship at a position and in profession is upheld, importantly, ensuring that the highest institutions are not withered at the helm of a few individuals.
Assuming the institutions like the President of India, the Supreme Court, and the Election Commission know the distinction of the institution and the individual, they are requested to take a cognizance of the matter. My request will be to have this distinction come out clear in all the off and official occasions and narratives.
The media definitely needs to take a cognizance of its narratives when representing an individual or an institution especially during the elections. Logically and morally, a PM/CM/HM should not be electioneering using the position and profession, and if they do so as individual, they should not be entitled to the use of the government machinery barring a few situations.
My urge to check on this matter may read bloating the matter and at the same time misunderstood, may be rightfully so; however, being a political science – public administration learner, I put this as query for clarification than objection. It is indeed unfortunate that query and objection are also not distinguished in our culture; more so in the recent times when queries are de-facto interpreted as objections, which is already a sign of suppression.
Still, with a hope that the President of India, the Supreme Court, the Election Commission and even the media houses will keep a constant check on the distinction of the institution and the individual to maintain (restore as few like to say now) the democracy in the country.
Thank you and Sincerely,
Jai Hind!
Mansee
---
*Entrepreneur, researcher educator, water enthusiast, governance scholar and keen political observer. Click here for more about

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

How lead petitioner was rendered homeless when GM mustard matter came up in SC

By Rosamma Thomas*  On January 5, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed a December 20, 2022 direction of the Uttarakhand High Court to the Indian Railways and the district administration of Haldwani to use paramilitary forces to evict thousands of poor families occupying land that belonged to the railways.  Justice AS Oka remarked that it was not right to order the bringing in of paramilitary forces. The SC held that even those who had no rights, but were living there for years, needed to be rehabilitated. On December 21, 2022, just as she was getting ready to celebrate Christmas, researcher Aruna Rodrigues was abruptly evicted from her home in Mhow Cantonment, Madhya Pradesh – no eviction notice was served, and nearly 30 Indian Army soldiers bearing arms were part of the eviction process. What is noteworthy in this case is that the records establishing possession of the house date back to 1892 – the title deed with the name of Dr VP Cardoza, Rodrigues’ great grandfather, is dated November 14

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Tax buoyancy claims when less than 4% Indian dollar millionaires pay income tax

By Prasanna Mohanty  In FY18, the last year for which disaggregated income tax data is available, only 29,002 ITRs declared income above Rs 5 crore, while Credit Suisse said India had 7.25 lakh dollar millionaires (the wealth equivalent of Rs 8 crore and above) that year. Often enough, the Centre claims that demonetization in 2016 raised tax collections, improved tax efficiency, and expanded the tax base. Now RBI Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) member Ashima Goyal has also joined their ranks, attributing the “claims” of rising tax collections in the current fiscal year to “tax buoyancy” brought by the demonetisation . Do such claims have any basis in official records? The answer is unequivocal. The budget documents show the tax-to-GDP ratio (direct plus indirect tax) increased from 10.6% in FY16 (pre-demonetization) to 11.2% in FY17, remained there in FY18 (demonetization and GST fiscals), and then fell to 9.9% in FY20. In FY22, it improved to 10.8% and is estimated to drop to 10.7% in

Gandhian unease at Mahadev Desai book launch: Sabarmati Ashram may lose free space

By Rajiv Shah  A simmering apprehension has gripped the Gandhians who continue to be trustees of the Sabarmati Ashram: the “limited freedom” to express one’s views under the Modi dispensation still available at the place which Mahatma Gandhi made his home from 1917 to 1930 may soon be taken away. Also known as Harijan Ashram, a meeting held for introducing yet-to-be-released book, “Mahadev Desai: Mahatma Gandhi's Frontline Reporter”, saw speaker and after speaker point towards “narrowing space” in Gujarat for Gandhians (as also others) to express themselves. Penned by veteran journalist Nachiketa Desai, grandson of Mahadev Desai, while the book was planned to be released on January 1 and the meeting saw several prominent personalities, including actor-director Nandita Das, her scholar-mother Varsha Das, British House of Lords member Bhikhu Parekh, among others, speak glowingly about the effort put in for bringing out the book, exchanges between speakers suggested it should be rele

Why no information with Assam state agency about female rhino poaching for a year?

By Nava Thakuria   According to official claims, incidents of poaching related to rhinoceros in various forest reserves of Assam in northeast India have decreased drastically. Brutal laws against the poachers, strengthening of ground staff inside the protected forest areas and increasing public awareness in the fringe localities of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries across the State are the reasons cited for positively impacting the mission to save the one-horned rhinos. Officials records suggest, only two rhinos were poached in Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve since 1 January 2021 till date. The last incident took place probably in the last week of December 2021, as a decomposed carcass of a fully-grown (around 30 years old) female rhino was recovered inside the world-famous forest reserve next month. As the precious horn was missing, for which the gigantic animal was apparently hunted down, it could not be a natural death. Ironically, however, it was not confirmed when

Civil rights leaders allege corporate loot of resources, suppression of democratic rights

By Our Representative  Civil rights activists have alleged, quoting top intelligence officers as also multiple international forensic reports, that recent developments with regard to the Bhima Koregaon and the Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) cases suggest, there was "no connection between the Elgaar Parishad event and the Bhima Koregaon violence." Activists of the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) told a media event at the HKS Surjeet Bhawan, New Delhi, that, despite this, several political prisoners continue to be behind bars on being accused under the anti-terror the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Addressed by family members of the political prisoners, academics, as well as social activists, it was highlighted how cases were sought to be fabricated against progressive individuals, democratic activists and intellectuals, who spoke out against "corporate loot of Indian resources, suppression of basic democratic

Kerala natural rubber producers 'squeezed', attend to their plight: Govt of India told

By Rosamma Thomas   Babu Joseph, general secretary of the National Federation of Rubber Producers Societies (NFRPS) at a recent discussion at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, explained that it is high time the Union government paid greater heed to the troubles plaguing the rubber production sector in India – rubber is a strategic product, important for the military establishment and for industry, since natural rubber is still used in the manufacture of tyres for large vehicles and aeroplanes. Synthetic rubber is now quite widespread, but styrene, which is used in making synthetic rubber and plastics, and also butadiene, another major constituent of synthetic rubber, are both hazardous. Prolonged exposure to these even in recycled rubber can cause neurological damage. Kerala produces the bulk of India’s natural rubber. In 2019-20, Kerala’s share in the national production of rubber was over 74%. Over 20% of the gross cropped area in the state is under rubber cultivation, with total

Bangladesh 'rights violations': US softens stance, fears increased clout of China, India

By Tilottama Rani Charulata*  In December 2021, in addition to the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the United States imposed sanctions on seven former and current officers of the force, alleging serious human rights violations. Benazir Ahmed and former RAB-7 commander Miftah Uddin Ahmed were banned from entering the US. RAB as an institution was also canceled the support it was getting from the US and its allies. At the same time, those under the ban have been notified of confiscation of assets held abroad. The anti-crime and anti-terrorism unit of the Bangladesh Police, RAB is the elite force consisting of members of the Bangladesh Army, Bangladesh Police, Bangladesh Navy, Bangladesh Air Force, Border Guard Bangladesh, Bangladesh Civil Service and Bangladesh Ansar, and has been criticized by rights groups for its use of extrajudicial killings and is accused of forced disappearances. The government of Bangladesh has been insisting about lifting the ban on RAB, but the US had till recen