Skip to main content

Gender bias: India's inheritance laws 'assume' men alone are providers of family

By Urmi Ashok Badiyani* 

The subject of inheritance is governed by the personal laws in India. The personal laws regulate marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance and succession for the citizens. These laws differ in line with the religion that a person belongs to.
For example, all Muslims in India are governed by Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 whereas all Hindus are governed by acts such as Hindu Succession Act of 1956, Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 and Hindu Code Bill. These personal laws govern how the property of a person is inherited. In addition to these laws, there are state laws that govern inheritance of certain assets such as land.
In most of the personal laws, the way in which property is inherited by the members differs for men and women. A Muslim daughter inherits only half of the inheritance given to a Muslim son and a wife’s right to a husband’s property is half of a husband’s right to the wife’s property. It is also interesting to note the terminology used by the laws. Sons are considered to be sharers of the properties whereas daughters are considered to be residuaries.
A Hindu woman’s parents have a right on her property only if she has no husband or children but the same is not the case for a Hindu man. A Parsi woman loses her right to inheritance if she marries a non-Parsi. Similarly, a non-Parsi wife cannot claim inheritance to her husband’s estate.

Biases in the state laws

While the inheritance of property is governed by personal laws which are uniform across the country, inheritance of agricultural land is governed by state laws. In states such as Uttar Pradesh (up until 2020) and Uttarakhand, transgenders were not allowed to inherit land. In States such as Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Punjab, daughters do not inherit the farm land of their parents.
These inheritance laws have two major implications:
  1. Women get an unequal access to the financial assets. The asset ownership in India is skewed in favour of men. The exact extent of this cannot be calculated due to the lack of data on the subject collected by the government.
  2. As all the laws are written in gender binary, people identifying themselves as gender fluid or non-binary are completely excluded from the inheritance laws. During the inheritance cases, these people are forced to be bucketed as either male or female to claim their shares. This identity is sometimes borrowed from their birth certificate. There are a lot of instances where such people are denied the rights to inherit the family property, thus putting them in a financially stressful situation.
The percentage of total property owned by women and transgender is quite low in India. This becomes even worse when we talk about productive assets such as farm land. These laws create a framework wherein a section of our society is derived from gaining access to financial equality and working towards creating financial stability for themselves. 
Generation after generation, concentration of assets in the hands of males is increased and the disparity that currently exists would continue or be worsened if the laws that are biased continue to exist.

Why are these laws even present?

The laws are built on the assumption that men will be the providers of the family with the responsibility of meeting the needs of the family, women will undertake the unpaid labour at home and non-binary people will be eliminated from the system.
In addition there is an underlying idea that men are heirs and carry forward the family legacy because of which they inherit the wealth from their parents whereas women are married and given a share of their wealth in the form of moveable property like jewellery. These assumptions about division of work and strict boundaries of gender led to creation of these gendered inheritance laws.
Generation after generation, concentration of assets in the hands of males is increased and disparity that currently exists would worsen
Article 14 of the Indian constitution states that no person will be denied equality in the eyes of law and Article 15 states that there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex and place of birth.
On perusal of the rules stated above, it is clear that the existing inheritance laws in place deny the right of equality and non-discrimination that is bestowed upon by the constitution of India on her citizens as their fundamental rights.

Learning from other countries?

The inheritance laws of countries like USA and France are written in a language that is gender neutral. Rather than using words like sons and daughters, gender neutral words like parents, children and spouses are used. Using of these gender neutral words create a legal ecosystem where a person is entitled to inheritance irrespective of their gender and the existing elimination of gender non-binary people and biases against women can be amended.
An approach akin to the one taken by countries like USA and France can be taken in India and the gendered references in the inheritance law can be eliminated from the statues and replaced with gender neutral terminology.
In state laws where inheritance of farmland by women is not allowed due to the fear of fragmentation of land, option such as the first right of refusal meaning that if a legal heir wants to sell their piece of land, the siblings will get the first right to purchase the land at market value.
With these changes an equal and unbiased legal system can be created for people of the country irrespective of their gender identity.
---
*Second year student at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

Comments

Anonymous said…
hi. congratulations urmi. my publish today: https://www.counterview.net/2021/04/when-will-mother-india-have-more-of.html . shall wait to hear your comments. we shall connect. do drop a line at 9824092804.
R.Varshnee said…
Hey!
Excellent job! thanks for the wide view on this topic

TRENDING

'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Polygamy in India "down" in 45 yrs: Muslims' from 5.7 to 2.55%, Hindus' 5.8 to 1.77%, "common" in SCs, STs

By Rajiv Shah Amidst All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) justifying polygamy, saying it “meets social and moral needs and the provision for it stems from concern and sympathy for women”, facts suggest the the practice is down from 5.7 per cent of Muslim families in 1961 to 2.55 per cent in 2006.

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Modi govt 'wholly untrustworthy' on Covid data, censored criticism on pandemic: Lancet

By Rajiv Shah*   One of the world’s most prestigious health journals, brought out from England, has sharply criticised the Narendra Modi government for being “wholly untrustworthy on Covid-19 health data”, stating, the “official government figures place deaths at more than 530 000, while WHO excess death estimates for 2020 and 2021 are near 4·7 million.”

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah*  A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”