Skip to main content

How exactly EVMs were hacked in Gujarat to get BJP elected? EVM machine has firmware inside the hardware...

By Amaresh Misra*
In 'Security Analysis of India’s Electronic Voting Machines', authors Hari K Prasad, J Alex Halderman and Rop Gonggrijp state clearly that "the Election Commission of India developed the country’s EVMs in partnership with two government-owned companies, the Electronics Corporation of India (ECIL) and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)...second-generation models were introduced in 2000...these machines moved the firmware into the CPU (Control Processing Unit) and upgraded...other components..."
Wikipedia defines Firmware as "a specific class of computer software...that provides both standardized operating environment for the device's more complex software (allowing more hardware-Independence), or, for less complex devices, act as the device's complete operating systems, performing all control, monitoring and data manipulations functions..."
Consider this: Firmware is a basic code written in C to do operations.
Is this code vulnerable to manipulation?
Yes it is. How?
The code doesnt change anything while voting or at any stage before counting. So, if you look at flaws in any process you wont find any. The code runs only during counting of total votes.
So, if the code is manipulated, it tries to favour, say, ' party X', over other parties... when the counting begins, it checks for party X versus votes other parties.
The code is usually manipulated or set to start working only if the margin of difference between X and other parties is say 10% or 15% ... or else, it will not do anything.
The margin is decided by the hacker’s boss and can be any number.
Also, there is a threshold limit, set say, above 20,000 votes. The code is set in a manner that it gets activated only when it reaches the threshold level. This way the code escapes detection at the trial level when few votes are cast and their total is tallied to test the machines.
The threshold level works in a way that if 'party X' is not near the threshold level, the code does not start working! This answers queries of those who say, if EVMs are being hacked, why doesn't 'party X' win all seats!
If the margin condition is met, the manipulated code does the following: reduce votes of others in proportion and add to party X.
First, it reduces votes of Independents to make party X win...
If party X is still losing, the manipulated code can take votes from others contenders.
Now, this explains why Independents lose maximum votes, and some even get zero, in such a scenario. 'Getting zero' is actually a bug in the code. Here, the 'if' condition has not been programmed fully to check that the code doesn't reduce vote of the party it attacks to zero.
The C code firmware is present in all machines before they are sent to polling booths. So the hacking is done at the level of manufacture.
Surprisingly, Election Commission (EC) verifications confirm only that all machines are using the same software version. It is not EC's job to check the firmware code.
EC just uses the machine as supplied to them with whatever code inside!
EVM firmware is stored in masked, read-only memory inside the microcontroller chips, and there is no provision for extracting it or verifying its integrity. This means that if the firmware code was modified before it was built into the CPUs, the changes would be very difficult to detect.
The software/firmware is integrated into the CPU by the manufacturer, Renesas, a Japanese company (other EVM models use CPUs made by Microchip, an American company). The afore-mentioned scholarly paper states that "consider the engineer responsible for compiling the source code and transmitting it to the CPU manufacturer. He or she could substitute a version containing a back door with little chance of being caught. This fact alone would be great temptation for fraud!"
Scholars go on to add that "similarly, employees at the chipmakers could alter the compiled program image before burning it into the chips. While more involved than modifying source code, reverse engineering firmware of such low complexity is not difficult and has been done (sometimes within a few weeks) with other voting systems in the context of academic research..."
Now, let's take the case of Rajkot West where BJP chief minister Vijay Rupani was contesting. At around 10-10.30 am the Congress candidate was leading by exactly 15% margin over Rupani! This is where the firmware code began attacking votes of independents and other smaller parties, taking them towards the BJP candidate. Suddenly, Rupani started getting votes, while other candidates began losing votes. My sources inside the Rajkot counting room say that after each hour, 15% votes were added to Rupani's kitty.
What do you see in the screenshot below that gives you the results of Rajkot West? That there were 5 Independent candidates -- three of them polled less than 1,000. One polled less than 2,000. BSP, the only recognized party, polled 1,400 votes. Other, obscure, small parties got less than 1000 votes.
The NOTA mystery also gets solved in Rajkot West. With all parties barring Congress and BJP getting minuscule votes, NOTA polled 3,251, second only to the Bahujan Mukti Party, which polled 4,122 votes. If you see the pattern of NOTA votes overall, they are significantly higher in areas from where the Congress has won.
NOTA votes dip when BJP wins!
So, a pattern emerges; in about 26 seats where BJP feared losing, the number of Independent candidates is high. In the early stages of counting, these independents got good votes. Then their votes started getting reduced!
NOTA votes seem to increase where BJP is seen in the beginning of counting as doing badly!
This explains several mysteries:
a). Why the BJP vote share is abnormally high? How is it that had Congress got 3,000 more votes in 16 seats where it lost by a margin less than 3000, it would have, while still at a vote share of 41.4% roughly, and 8% behind BJP, got 93 seats, and formed the Government!
b). Remember, the EVM is hacked not through bluetooth or at the polling stage; the scenario that machines showing the BJP symbol when voters are pressing Congress symbol is not covered in this schematics! EVMs are hacked only during counting, through pre-determined setting of codes in firmware.
c). Was the EVM hacked in the 16 seats where Congress lost by less than 3000 votes? No, EVMs were not hacked through pre-determined codes in those 16 seats. The manipulation on these seats was done manually, on the counting day, by scaring counting agents and making BJP win by force!
d). EVMs were hacked through predetermined codes in constituencies where BJP votes are abnormally high, like above 80,000. In these seats, invariably, BJP candidates started winning after trailing by 15% margin! See the Surat seats... and Mehsana!
e). Arvind Kejriwal knows the truth. But his demonstration of EVM hacking, conducted inside the Delhi assembly, did not address the firmware issue...and how hacking takes place only on counting day!
f). The book written by BJP's Narsimha Rao also avoids the issue.
g). It is now clear that international forces are involved in EVM hacking in India!
h). It is not Pakistan but the US lobby, including Japan and Israel, that is subverting Indian democracy!
i). So the EVM hacking thing is not just a technical problem. It is not a live political issue. Congress is the only party that is standing up to US pressure. But the rider is that with the whole Indian establishment infiltrated by the US-Israel-RSS triad, Congress has to compromise and step back from confrontation at intervals.
j). The real problem is the lack of a real civil society movement, of people hitting the streets on this issue. But people are unaware. With all propaganda channels blocked, there is no way things can be put across to the people of India.
---
* For source click HERE

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Now, top Gujarat "litterateur" close to Modi says: Godse was patriot, so was Gandhi

By Rajiv Shah
A little over a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized BJP candidate from Bhopal Pragya Thakur for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot saying he would never forgive her for the remark, a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, known to close to Modi in Gujarat, has supported her, saying her statement should be seen “within a context.” Thakur won from Bhopal by more than 3.5 lakh votes defeating her nearest rival, veteran Congressman and ex-Madhya Pradesh chief minister Digvijay Singh.

Opposition refuses to legally challenge EVMs amidst plans of "back to ballot" protest

Counterview Desk
Even as opposition to the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) allegedly to rig polls is growing, a group of prominent citizens who have come together to form the EVM Virodhi Rashtriya Jan Andolan has controversially called for a national protest against EVMs on May 30, demanding future elections should be held only on ballot paper.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

When a Pak scribe said Modi has 'proved' Jinnah’s two nation theory right...

By Zafar Agha*
It was around nine in the morning on May 24, 2019, a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi stormed the Lok Sabha with 300-plus MPs. It was a call from a journalist friend, Muzamal Suhrawardy, from Lahore, Pakistan. I ignored the call. We liberals had a depressing day the previous evening as the opposition to Modi and BJP collapsed. The results belied reports from the ground and even assessments made by colleagues.

It's now official: Akshay Kumar has not been conferred honorary Canadian citizenship

By Our Representative
It is now official. Super-star Akshay Kumar has not been conferred any honorary citizenship by Canadian authorities, as claimed by him ahead of the 2019 elections. In reply to a query by Roshan Shah, who is a Canadian citizen living in Waterloo, Ontario, and belongs to Ahmedabad, the country’s authorities dealing with issues related with immigration, refugees and citizenship in Canada have said that only six persons have so far been granted honorary citizenship.

Govt of India overestimated GDP by 2.5%, must restore reputational damage: Ex-CEA

By Rajiv Shah
Top economist Arvind Subramanian has said that changes brought about by the Government of India in data sources and methodology for estimating the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) since 2011-12 “has led to a significant overestimation of growth”. While official estimates place annual average GDP growth between 2011-12 and 2016-17 at about 7 percent, the actual growth may have been 4½ percent, ranging from 3 ½ to 5 ½ percent during the period, he adds.

Common thread of Modi, political Hinduism, nationalism? 'Contest' of ideas isn't over

By Salman Khurshid*
Losing the 2019 election and that too in a somewhat extreme manner has confronted us with unexpected challenges: Our leadership has naturally taken it very hard and to heart but with suggested options that we cannot imagine or contemplate. Hopefully the emotions will settle soon and give us the direction to pick up the pieces and march again.

If EC's credibility is under question, shouldn't one "assume" EVMs might be tampered?

Counterview Desk
Gauhar Raza, scientist, documentary film maker and poet; senior human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi of the Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (ANHAD); military veteran Major Priyadarshi Chowdhury (retd); and Sucheta De and Sandeep Saurav of the All India Students' Association (AISA), have asked “individuals, organisations and people's movements” to send their endorsement to an appeal they have prepared on Electronic Voting Machine (EVM).

Will minorities in India be 2nd class citizens? Wake up call: Be a 'communicating' Church

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
India today is at a defining moment of her history. There is so much that has taken place in the past five years (and particularly in the last ten days)- that several citizens of the country are genuinely concerned about the future of the country! Will democracy survive? Will key elements of the Constitution be changed?