Skip to main content

Modi's sea-plane ride on an aircraft owned by a foreign company was outright violation of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act

Letter by EAS Sarma, former energy secretary, Government of India, to AK Joti, Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, with copies forwarded to PK Sinha, Cabinet Secretary, and Rajiv Gauba, Union Home Secretary:
I enclose a Business Standard report dated 14-12-2017 (“Gujarat: Did Modi's seaplane fly from Karachi to escort him to Dharoi?”) which suggests that
i. During his travel in Gujarat in connection with BJP's election campaign, Shri Narendra Modi accepted an air ride from Ahmedabad to Dharoyi and back on a sea-plane on 12-12-2017. The sea-plane was an aircraft (Kodiak 100) owned by a foreign company, namely, Utah-based Quest Aircraft Company, operated by a Japanese plane-maker. Apparently, the aircraft is also owned by the Bank of Utah with registration in the US.
ii. The contents of the news report suggest that the Prime minister's aerial ride was intended to bypass the lack of police permission for a road show in Gujarat. It appears that the journey undertaken on the sea-plane became a part and parcel of the election campaign for BJP as it did have a visible impact on the people. The news report states that "BJP went a little overboard in highlighting Modi's last rally for Gujarat polls. BJP's twitter handle posted 'Modi becomes first passenger of India’s first ever seaplane!'” This leads to the inescapable inference that the sea-plane ride was intended to be a part of the election campaign.
iii. In other words, the expenditure incurred on the sea-plane ride, whether paid for or not, will have to be deemed to be a part of the election expenses for BJP's Gujarat election campaign, as envisaged in the Representation of the People Act and it therefore needs to be reckoned as such by the Election Commission of India (ECI)
iv. The news report estimates the cost of the sea-plane ride to be Rs 40 lakhs. Since an aircraft owned by a foreign company was involved, this amounts to an outright violation of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA). FCRA prohibits political parties from accepting donations, direct or indirect, from a foreign source.
v. If either the Central government agencies or the State govt agencies have paid for the expenditure incurred on the sea-plane ride, the ECI should take cognizance of the same and take such action that is appropriate against all those responsible for diverting public funds for private electioneering.
I request the ECI to treat the implicit cost of the sea-plane ride as a part of the election expense of BJP in the ongoing Gujarat election campaign and take necessary action under the Representation of the People Act. This is necessary in order to send a strong message that the ECI would not encourage expensive election campaigning in whatever manner it manifests itself.
Further, I request the Union Home Ministry to proceed against those who have violated the FCRA. Acceptance of donations from foreign sources, in whatever manner they flow in, is unacceptable from the point of view of long-term national security.
If you fail to take the necessary action, I will be constrained to seek judicial intervention under the Representation of the People Act as well as under FCRA.

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”