Skip to main content

Gujarat officials "indifferent" to communal riot victims, "don't care" to implement PM's 15 point programme for minorities

Allubhai
By A Representative
Living in a continued state of fear even nine months after the attack on his son, allegedly by Bajrang Dal activists on March 24, 2017, Allubhai of Vadagam village in Dhansura block of Aravalli district, Gujarat, complains that no action has yet been taken against those who tried to instigate the communal divide by seeking to whip up the love jehad bogey.
A teenager, his son was listening to a Bollywood song being played in a car, says Allubhai, a daily wage worker. The boy was spotted by a local, and accusations flew high that he was seeking to molest a Hindu girl. At around 9 pm, a group of goons entered the Muslim mohalla in Vadagam, wielding iron rods and swords, hockey sticks, engaging in wanton destruction of property.
"Instead of taking our complaints, the police detained six of us", Allubhai says, adding, "Even 79 year old Aminaben was put behind bars. On being freed, we were forced to flee our village. Badly injured, my son was picked up from the Civil Hospital in Modasa. While following a compromise with elders we have returned, wounds are still fresh in our memory."
Participating in a workshop organised by Ahmedabad-based NGO Rehnuma, the incident which Allubhai narrated was cited as an example to suggest how the Prime Minister's 15 point programme for minorities is not being implemented in its letter and spirit in Gujarat.
Sahara rehab site in Modasa town
The workshop was held as part of a discussion on "Minority Appeasement: Myth or Reality?", an action research report, funded by European Union and prepared by Rehnuma, the minority rights NGO promoted by Centre for Social Justice, Ahmedabad.
The report states, "Victims living in Vadagam have gone unheard by the police and not a single FIR has been registered", adding, this is just one example of "lack of response to the victims", which is promoting "further alienation of religious minorities, a factor that defeats the core objectives of the 15-point programme."
Tanay Gandhi, a researchers who introduced the report, said, "Even today, the authorities refuse to call the Vadagam incident communal incident and compensate to those who suffered." Situated near Modasa town, Vadagam had remained free of the 2002 Gujarat communal flareup, which affected the areas around it in a big way.
The report also gives the example of how victims of the communal riots in Modasa town and adjacent areas have been living in sub-human conditions in the rehabilitation settlement Sahara even today. The report says, "The community living has no awareness of the 15-Point Programme or the benefits they were entitled."
"There is a dire need for quality drainage, piped water supply, garbage disposal, paved roads, schools, hospitals etc., in Sahara colony. And while the victims have been rehabilitated, these important facilities have been overlooked and the ownership of the land and buildings has still not been transferred to the victims", the report states.
The report regrets, senior officials, including the Superintendent of Police and the district collector, refused to answer questions regarding the steps taken by the administration to combat communal violence, identify riot-prone areas etc., as required under the 15 point programme.
"While awareness of the communal violence prevention points of the 15-point programme was good enough, the willingness to discuss what was done according to the guidelines is non-existent", the report says.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.