Skip to main content

Should Nehru's party worker not speak up when a leader of a communal party makes statements incompatible with the Constitution?

Counterview Desk
Disowned by Maharashtra Congress and his family, including his brother Tehseen, Shehzad Poonawalla wrote two controversial letters to Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, first on November 15 and the second one on November 18, stating that, perturbed over "the unabashed proliferation of dynasty politics and children of leaders getting promoted everywhere at the cost of merit", he was offering his unconditional resignation from all offices relating to the party until he was given the opportunity to be heard. Text of the two letters:
I have been a humble worker of Congress/Nehru ideology since 2007-08. Often as a volunteer i would come to Delhi after saving my pocket money for months and work free at AICC HQ. Many leaders and journalists know about my struggles. Have my voluntary internship letters too to prove this. Will be happy to show them if I get to meet you one on one.
In 2016, I was appointed as Maharashtra Congress Secretary after 8-9 years of pure, honest hard work. Till date, I have sought nothing from my party except to contribute for it: Using my resources in the public, legal fraternity and media and have held hundreds of programs and taken up several cases to strengthen the party's ideological fight. I made one mistake though: The mistake of seeking an opportunity to discuss some very pressing issues that led to our defeat in 2014—top at the list -- the unabashed proliferation of dynasty politics and children of leaders getting promoted everywhere at the cost of merit.
Just a quick backdrop: In 2013, I was selected as the best spokesman by a professional set of observers , when training was done at 15GRG but everybody including Surjewala (son of a leader), Salman Soz (son of a leader) and many others made the cut at the behest of Maken (relative of a leader) but I did not. Still, I served the party without expectation or disappointment as is my dharma. I have fought cases like hate speech by Subramanian Swamy, for civil rights of minorities and to build Hindu Muslim unity. I was in touch with Kanishk Singh ji (from 2012-13) seeking your time but never ever got it.
But I am unable to still get time to address the most important structural issues plaguing the party for over years now. I understand these issues are difficult and God knows I have tried to address them even while I was defending the party with all my heart and soul. But to ask me to abandon those issues and to stay quiet on this issue affecting all Indians and important civil rights issues that affect minorities is NOT correct. This pressure today has crossed all limits. I have and will continue to raise them as an ordinary supporter of the ideology and I am offering my unconditional resignation from all offices till the time I am given an opportunity to raise the most important plaguing issue with my leadership directly. It may deemed an automatic resignation if my leadership is unable to make time or if I am coerced to staying silent on issues which matter to 99.999 percent Indians whose journey in politics begins without any father, godfather.
I will remain true to the ideology and hence I did not get poached unlike many seniors post 2014 for greener pastures. But 65 percent of India is below 35 years. I am too from that segment. If a young man cannot address a pressing problem that denies youngsters opportunity to participate in politics due to skewed electoral laws and party systems, within his own party, where does one go? Should Nehru's party worker not speak up when a leader of a communal party makes statements incompatible with the Constitution? Should I not bring to your attention the overwhelming number of dynasts who are given tickets, party positions and patronage? Should I be prevented from fighting that fight? If yes, please consider my resignation from all offices of the party. If not, I will be happy to meet you and elaborate further sir.
I understand a false campaign of misinformation and calumny will be launched against my family and me by those who seek to pull me down: All kinds of rumours will be planted and old baseless skeletons will be removed but I know that nobody said anything until now (2017 after a year and half of my appointment in Maharashtra Congress) and my letter may make them speak today about non-issues. I will not be swayed from my mission.
I await (as I have done always) for your positive response. If you choose not to meet me that is fine too. My respect for Nehru ji and all our leaders remains intact.
***
I am saddened that there has been no response to my letter to you dated 15 November, 2017 in which I had requested your valuable time to discuss issues relating to civil rights (including minority rights for certain communities like Hindus and Kashmiri Pandits in Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir) and the most important issue of dynasty and fair opportunity to non-dynasts within the party. In the past few days you have met several leaders and activists but it seems that there is little interest in meeting an active, state level, self-made functionary who has concrete solutions to curb dynasty politics in our party. I have been seeking time from your office for a long time in this regard. Anyhow, as a disciplined soldier of the party I will use this medium to communicate some important points with regard to the impending election of the Congress president and dynasty culture within the party.
Sir, 65 percent of India is below the age of 35 and it is this section of voters who played a decisive role in the 2014 election. Takes no rocket science to figure that armed with social media (Whatsapp, Facebook and twitter) enabled smartphones, they will play a bigger role in the 2019 election. Apart from jobs, the state of the economy, Young India has and will also vote for a personality that reflects it's aspirational and identity quotient. That it voted in 2014 with vengeance for a man (who projected himself as a "chaiwala" and a political outsider) especially after that classist jibe made by Mani Shankar Aiyyar is an indicator of the revulsion most people have, especially in this age group, for dynastic privilege, especially in the new politics of a transforming India. But has our party been able to fully understand this?
Rahul Gandhi ji, you joined Congress party in 2004 and immediately got the opportunity to contest the Lok Sabha polls from your family bastion of Amethi. You were then elevated to the position of general secretary while Sonia Maharashtra unit secretary Gandhi was the Congress president. You took charge of the youth wings of the party namely IYC and NSUI and promised to revolutionise it. You led the 2012 Uttar Pradesh Assembly election campaign, holding over 150 rallies, in which the Congress finished in last place. (In 2017 Uttar Pradesh elections, despite your best efforts, the Congress party deteriorated even further and held on to the fourth place in a state which gave birth to Nehru, Congress' tallest leader, this time with lesser dignity and pride). In 2013, you were selected as the Congress vice-president or the de facto number two in the party and to most of us it was clear that you were calling all the shots in the run up to the 2014 elections, where we were reduced to an all-time low of 44 seats.
Today, in a 19 day well-choreographed and orchestrated exercise, beginning on December 1, you will be elevated to the position of the president of the Congress party. Some folks are waiting until the last date of nominations (4 December) and some till counting day (19 December) to arrive at a forgone conclusion about who will be crowned the next president! My friend Rajiv Tyagi, an official spokesperson of Congress has declared, presumably as part of the party line on national television, that a "Gandhi" would be the president of the Congress not for ten/twenty years but for the next fifty years!
The party has not issued a clarification on this until now, thus confirming that they agree with Tyagi's zealous sycophancy and also that the forthcoming election is essentially a stage managed exercise. Do you agree with Rajiv Tyagi? Is the post of president directly or indirectly reserved for "Gandhis"? Illusions like these, where loyalist delegates (members who get to choose and vote between you and well no one ), handpicked and appointed essentially at behest of loyalist state presidents , who in turn were handpicked by the Congress president, who also handpicked the vice-president in 2013 and the ultra-loyal members of the Congress Working Committee (highest decision making body in the party) which rubber stamps every decision taken by the Congress president and you and conveniently times the rather elaborate process, to make it look and feel like a real election, are so sophisticated that even if one was to contest against you, it would be the equivalent of vying for a vote from a mother who is choosing between her own less talented son and the more talented, meritorious outsider.
The choice of the winner would be obvious: It is no contest when the system is rigged. Is this just how transparent, free and fair this December election or any election in the Congress will be, by the virtue of which even the likes of a Tyagi can predict its outcome for the next fifty years? Do let me know Rahul ji. Thank God in all likelihood you will be unanimously (s)elected because most Congress leaders like me know how vain it is to even try to contest. A worker like me would have considered filing a nomination and contesting if you are willing to take a few things on with the candidness.
To make this election fair you must take the following steps:
1) Firstly, a common party worker like me joined the party in 2008-09. I spent time, energy and money working voluntarily for the party at all levels and finally got elevated after eight years to the position of a secretary in a state unit in 2016. But how and why (other than your surname) did you in the same time span get to start off with an MP seat in 2004 itself, general secretaryship in 2007 and then graduate to vice-president of the national unit while his mother was the president? Did you win us more elections, were you genuinely elected to these posts, did you give better speeches than other leaders? You must therefore resign from the vice-president's post and contest as an ordinary member for the election of the president. How can it be a fair contest if a common worker has to contest against the VP (who was selected and not elected as the VP or the number 2 in the party)?
2) Since the delegate system is completely rigged and manipulated, for a fair fight for the presidentship will you allow real delegates to get appointed and vote rather than a bunch of handpicked "yes" men?
3) If not, will you at least face your rival in a televised debate to see who articulates a better vision for the Congress party and India? Will you allow yourself to be judged on merit than your surname? If yes, let's have that contest. I am ready.
4) You failed to deliver on the promise that IYC, NSUI won't end up electing children of netas (those who can spend huge sums to became state presidents, such as the son of Patangarao Kadam in Maharashtra or the son of Virbhadra Singh in Himachal Pradesh become state presidents) Will you at least now curb the innumerable dynasts who are given tickets and posts in the party by implementing the rule :One ticket/post to only one member in any family. So if I have a party ticket or post, my brother, sister, mother, brother-in-law, cannot be eligible for a ticket or post. We are not some family business, are we?
I doubt you will be open to any of these suggestions. If you are, I would be happy to contest this election against you in a fair system.
Rahul ji, during the 2002 Gujarat riots while I was in school, I read in my text books about Nehru, Azad and Gandhi and it was natural for folks like me to fall in love with the Congress ideology. It has a glorious history of over 100 years, it led the freedom struggle and had a solid track record towards building India since Independence. When you took over in 2007, I did not like your direct placement. Is it a private limited company or some Bollywood "khan-dan" I asked myself.
I heard you speak and articulate your plans to "change the system". I was willing to give my first love time: The Congress time to evolve into the party a million nobodies like me truly desired. One where merit and talent counts more than the feudal systems of dynastic political patronage and sycophantic loyalty. It has been ten years since you made those promises but are yet to deliver on those. The more things change the more they remain the same! Dynasts get the overwhelming share of election tickets and nominations to posts in the party: From Ajay Maken to Jyotiraditya Scindia, from Gaurav Gogoi to Sushmita Dev, dynasts enjoy his confidence more than non-dynasts, the power and decision making authority is confined to this elite club.
Farcical and cosmetic exercises take place but nothing changes substantially. I again ask you: Will you bring in a rule that only one ticket or post will be given in every family including your own?
Millions of non-dynastic, progressive, secular liberals like me pin their hopes on Congress. Whether we win or lose Gujarat, if we remain the party that pays more attention to "who you are" than "what you can deliver", it gives more credence to one's legacy and last name than one's merit and hard work, the alternative we provide will be no better than those we oppose. In BJP, you get preference if you belong to the "Sangh Parivar". In Congress, you get preference if you belong to "some parivar".
Rahul ji, I want you to be our party president but not only because you are "Gandhi". Let your leadership be tested through a real election. Let the party be more open to merit and talent than it is to dynasty. Nobody will have the courage to tell you this. Nobody will have the courage to show you the mirror. They are sychophants. To please you they will attack my family and me; malign my work and me and plant misinformation and stories against me (wait and watch) which did not exist till yesterday. I am ready for this slander.
Notwithstanding all the odds and bad times (Congress getting reduced to mere 44 seats), I have not gone to greener pastures despite the various offers and continued to work without any vacation for the party selflessly and without any expectations from 2008-09. But if you think talking about dynasty is against the principles of Mahatma Gandhi's Congress then by all means Rahul Gandhi's Congress can surely sack me or throw me out. Unlike Hemanta Biswa Sarma, I will serve the party and continue to voice my views against parivarwaad and will form and lead an anti-dynasty front within the party. I hope rather than shift the blame on somebody else you can take a stand on issues I have mentioned in my letter. Let us end dynasty politics now before it ends our party.
Best wishes for Gujarat elections. I am working as hard as I can to ensure BJP is defeated.
-- Shehzad Poonawalla, Secretary, Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee

Comments

TRENDING

North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By Our Representative  A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur. The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order. The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization

Majoritarian silence helping Hindutva forces 'handover' national resources to corporates

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The majority of Indian citizens are witnessing the persecution and everyday violence against their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities. The growing assaults on reason, science, secularism, Indian democracy and constitution are going to be landmarks in Indian history of diminishing democracy and citizenship rights. It is clear that Hindutva ideology is directly promoting sectarian politics of hate which is dangerous for the unity and integrity of India, peace and prosperity of Indians. The majoritarian silence helps in empowering Hindutva and their electoral dividends. From witnessing the persecution in the sidelines to the active participation and cheering loud or silence accelerates violence against our neighbours and our fellow citizens. How and why do majority of Indians stay silent and contribute to the persecution of their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities? The question baffles me as an Indian because I have gr

Electricity Bill: Centre's reform measures contain 'carrot and stick package' for states

Counterview Desk  The Peoples’ Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPSPS), claiming to be a network of eminent academics, jurists, erstwhile administrators, trade unionists and social activists, seeking consultations with stakeholders with those who are against the government’s decision to monetise, disinvest and privatise public assets/enterprises, has said that the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill-2022 will have far-reaching impacts on the finances of states. Insisting that the proposed Bill would lead to “assault on India’s federal structure”, in a statement, it says, it would weaken the finances of states’ power distribution companies, have adverse impact on utility employees, cripple the states' finances, impose a heavy cost burden on the smaller subsidized consumers (especially farmers), and benefit only corporate business houses. “States cannot afford to ignore the far-reaching implications of the Bill on their economy, finances, agricultural and industria

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in