Skip to main content

BJP leaders "pooh-poohed" minority status to Hindus in J&K 20 yrs ago, NDA govt "cold shouldered" recommendation

By Our Representative
In a significant revelation, a former chairman of the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) has said that a report, prepared under him, recommending to the NDA government under Atal Behari Vajpayee that Hindus be treated as minorities in non-Hindu majority states of India was “pooh-poohed” by BJP leaders and “cold shouldered” by the government.
According to former NCM chairman Tahir Mahmood, who was also member of the Law Commission of India, this happened “two decades” ago, when he “personally prepared a special report titled ‘Hindu Minorities in India’, written after visiting the states concerned and hearing local leaders.”
“My report, recommending state-level minority status for Hindus in Jammu & Kashmir, Lakshadweep, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Punjab, was endorsed by the Commission and submitted to the central government, then led by the BJP”, Mahmood says in an article, adding though, it was rejected.
Mahmood’s stark revelation comes amidst a petition filed in the Supreme Court seeking to recognize Hindus as a religious minority in certain states, but says Mahmood, “If the petitioner’s idea has his party’s support it is intriguing.”
There are two petitions on the issue. One of them, filed by Ankur Sharma, a Jammu lawyer, came up for hearing the Supreme Court this month, insisting on the need to set up minorities commission in J&K, because, according to him, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Christians were “unable” to access benefits meant for minorities in the state, where 68.3% of the population is Muslim.
Sharma’s plea came after a BJP lawyer-leader Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay, petitioned the apex court to direct the Government of India to confer minority status on Hindus in seven states, including J&K, and a Union Territory.
On the advice of a bench headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Upadhyay withdrew his petition and has now approached the National Commission for Minorities, which is said to be considering the matter.
According to Sharma, in J&K, in the absence of a minorities commission, “crores worth aid are being given away to a certain community, which is the majority Muslim community, in an illegal and arbitrary manner”.
Says Mahmood, the apex court said, since J&K does not fall within the purview of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, a state minorities commission can only be set up "through legislation by the state assembly or an administrative order by the state government."
He notes, in the Constitution, Article 29 proclaims that “any section of citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have a right to conserve the same”.
He adds, "Article 30 recognises the right of a religious or linguistic minority to establish and administer educational institutions."
"Read together, the two provisions may be taken as the constitutional charter for religious and linguistic minorities at all levels", he underlines, adding, however, "The Constitution does not specify a mechanism for identifying groups of citizens covered by either of these provisions."
According to Mahmood, "The National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, confined in application to religious minorities, does not list them either; it only states that for the purposes of the Act the word 'minorities' means communities 'notified as such' by the central government."
Based on this, he says, a notification "issued under this provision in 1993 proclaimed Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, Sikhs and Parsis as minorities".
Mahmood adds, "The Jains protested against their exclusion and, on taking over as the Commission’s chairman, I took the position that since the Constitution and the laws bracket Jains with Buddhists and Sikhs, the government had two options: either drop Buddhists and Sikhs from the list or to extend it to Jains."
Fifteen years later, the government went for the second option – on the persistent demand of some Jain leaders, the 1993 notification was modified to include their community among the minorities.

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”