Skip to main content

Cancel Romila Thapar as Ambedkar Memorial Lecture speaker as she "overlooked" caste issues: Dalit body

By Our Representative
In a surprising move, a top Dalit rights organization, Dalit Bahujan Adivasi Collective (DBAC), has taken strong exception to Prof Romila Thapar, one of the foremost historians of India, for the 2016 Ambedkar Memorial Lecture (AML) at the Ambedkar University, Delhi (AUD).
Professor emeritus at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), Thapar recently threw her weight behind the students during the recent police crackdown on JNU campus. The lecture has been organized on the 125th birth anniversary of Dr BR Ambedkar, April 14.
Raising the pitch against Thapar, who has been a long-time critic of Hindutva idologues, the DBAC said, thought it "respected" her "vast body of work", the differences with her do not just stem from "her upper caste identity alone."
DBAC underlined, the differences are also ideological in nature -- "due to the fact that most of her intellectual and political positions have largely been determined by a Left liberal ethos, which in its Indian avatar has overlooked, to a great extent, the centrality of caste in social, political, economic, and cultural formations."
"This lacuna, which we can broadly identify even in Prof Thapar's work, is also a by-product of an array of privileges (including her upper caste/class location)", the DBAC said, adding, "Also significant in this context is the fact that her body of work has shown no direct commitment to Ambedkar's radical vision on history and politics."
Providing a list of previous speakers, the DBAC, which has written a letter to the university vice chancellor, said, all those chosen by the university to speak on the occasion in the previous years also represented "the same upper caste discourse which preserves the status quo and has suppressed those interpretations of Indian history and society which have emerged painstakingly from the margins over several decades."
Going ahead with its sharp critique, the DBAC said, "This naturalisation of privileges is in fact detrimental to the development of Dalit, Bahujan, Adivasi and minority discourses on history."
Calling itself a "student collective that is motivated by Ambedkarite vision and thoughts", with a strong backing of a section of Dalit academics and professionals, the letter asked the vice-chancellor to "immediately reconsider Prof Romila Thapar's selection to deliver the Ambedkar Memorial Lecture in 2016 and consider more relevant scholars."
It further said, "Henceforth, in the selection of speakers to deliver the AML, there should be an institutional mechanism to ensure participation of onlyscholars from Dalit, Bahujan, Adivasi and minority communities; scholars from any other backgrounds who have had a longstanding commitment to Dalit, Bahujan, Adivasi and minority discourses in ways that mark them in the league of Ambedkarite scholars; and scholars whose work has engaged directly with Ambedkar's own speeches and body of writing."
Calling selection of speakers for AML series "exclusionary" the letter said, "Addressing such issues is especially urgent in the context that this year, the University is celebrating the 125th birth anniversary of Dr BR Ambedkar."
It goes ahead to say, "It hardly needs restating that the upper castes (savarnas led by the Brahmins), by carefully and wilfully sustaining a caste hierarchy, have monopolised the production of knowledge within academia, both in India and abroad. Such hegemonic practices have systematically and consistently placed hurdles before Dalits, Bahujans, Adivasis and minorities from accessing spaces of knowledge production on equitable grounds."
"This", the letter said, "is more than evident given the overwhelming representation of savarnas in both faculty and student positions across universities in India. Such monopolisation is accompanied by other (very often invisible) forms of institutionalised caste discrimination both within and outside the university space."
Those who have been called to speak on to deliver the AML series are:
  • 2009: Bhikhu Parekh – Ambedkar's Legacy
  • 2010: Veena Das – Citizenship as a Claim or Stories of Belonging among the Urban Poor
  • 2011: Deepak Nayyar – Discrimination and Justice: Beyond Affirmative Action
  • 2012: Ashis Nandy – Theories of Oppression and Another Dialogue of Cultures
  • 2013: Upendra Baxi – Restoring 'Title Deeds to Humanity': Lawless Law, Living Death, and the Insurgent Reason of Babasaheb Ambedkar
  • 2014: Gopal Krishna Gandhi – Leading India
  • 2015: Aruna Roy – Is unbridled capitalism a threat to Constitutional Democracy?
"While these speakers may be some of the 'best minds' of the country, it is more than evident that there is a clear (if not deliberate) pattern of exclusion of scholars from Dalit, Bahujan, Adivasi and minority communities", the letter insisted.
---
Access full letter HERE

Comments

Unknown said…

The claim of DBAC may correct but restricting people like Romila Thapar may not be the solution. We must keep in mind that most of them are known for their anti-caste & anti-Brahmanism position except Ashish Nandi who has openly accused Dalits as most corrupt last year. We need to make them more accountable by challenging them instead to exclude. Otherwise, people who are against Dalit will use this position as an opportunity. DBAC must be careful and reconsider it's decision. warmly !
SMA said…
AGREE.

TRENDING

India under Modi among top 10 autocratizing nations, on verge of 'losing' democracy status

By Rajiv Shah
A new report, prepared by a top Swedish institute studying liberal democracy, has observed that there has been a sharp “dive in press freedom along with increasing repression of civil society in India associated with the current Hindu-nationalist regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” The report places India among the top 10 countries that “have autocratized the most”. Other countries that have been identified for rolling towards autocracy are -- Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Serbia, Brazil, Mali, Thailand, Nicaragua and Zambia.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Border conflict? RBI nod India's 'brotherly' help to China internationalise its currency

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
In the middle of a global pandemic, China started an unprovoked border conflict with India. It unraveled trust deficit and ties between the two neighbours. As thousands of Chinese troops tried occupying Indian territory, the Narendra Modi-led BJP government directs the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to allow the Bank of China to start regular banking services in India. The Bank of China will now operate in India like any other commercial banks.

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

By Shamsul Islam*
National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

Clean chit to British rulers, Muslim League? Karnataka to have Veer Savarkar flyovers

By Shamsul Islam*
The BJP government of Karnataka led by BS Yediyurappa is going to honour Hindutva icon VD Savarkar by naming two of the newly built major flyovers in Bangalore and Mangalore after him. There was a huge uproar against this decision of the RSS-BJP government as many pro-Kannada organisations with opposition parties and liberal-secular organizations questioned the logic to ignore so many freedom fighters, social reformers and others from within the state.

Hurried nod to Western Ghat projects: 16 lakh Goans' water security 'jeopardised'

Counterview Desk
Taking strong exception to "virtual clearances" to eco-sensitive projects in the Western Ghats, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) in a statement has said urged for a review of the four-lane highway, 400 KV transmission line and double tracking of the railway line through the Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary and Mollem National Park in Goa.

Disturbing signal? Reliance 'shifting focus' away from Indian petrochemical sector

By NS Venkataraman*
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), a large Indian company, has expanded and grown in a spectacular manner during the last few decades, like of which no industrial group in India has performed before. RIL is now involved in multi various activities relating to petroleum refineries, petrochemicals, oil and gas exploration, coal bed methane, life sciences, retail business, communication network, (Jio platform) media/entertainment etc.

Letter to friends, mentors: Coming together of class, communal, corona viruses 'scary'

By Prof (Dr) Mansee Bal Bhargava*
COVID greetings from Ahmedabad to dear mentors and friends from around the world…
I hope you are keeping well and taking care of yourself besides caring for the people around you. I’m writing to learn how is the science and the society coping with the prevention and cure of the pandemic. I’m also writing to share the state of the corona virus that is further complicated with the long-standing class and communal viruses.

Case for nationalising India's healthcare system amidst 'strong' private control

Counterview Desk
A draft discussion note, prepared by Dr Maya Valecha, a Gujarat-based gynecologist and activist, sent to the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) as also a large number of activists, academics and professionals as an email alert, is all set to create a flutter among policy experts for its strong insistence on nationalizing India’s healthcare system.