Skip to main content

Advantage Congress?: Gujarat High Court sets aside Ordinance postponing local polls citing "disturbances"

Shaktisinh Gohil
By Our Representative
 In what is being widely interpreted as the first major setback to Gujarat's BJP rulers after Narendra Modi left as India's Prime Minister more than a year ago, the Gujarat High Court has junked a recent Ordinance of the state government enabling the State Election Commission (SEC) to postpone local body elections on the grounds that of “unforeseen circumstances”.
The ordinance was issued in October first week, less than two weeks after the powerful Patidar agitation rocked Gujarat demanding reservation within the other backward class (OBC) framework. No sooner did Gujarat governor OP Kohli put his sign of approval to promulgate the ordinance, the SEC postponed the polls for three months, after which, it said, it would “review” the ground realities before holding elections.
The ordinance called for appointing administrators in local bodies on the ground that it was “not possible to hold elections and constitute body in corporations, panchayats and nagarpalika in unforeseen circumstances like natural calamity, riots, disturbance on account of voters not being allowed to vote freely and fairly.”
The High Court ruled that the decision of SEC to “delay” the polls was illegal and unconstitutional, adding, the SEC must immediately start electoral process, even as asking the state government to provide “all necessary security measures.”
Acting Chief Justice Jayantbhai Patel and Justice NV Anjaria, delivering the verdict, observed that if elections could be held in Jammu & Kashmir, why could they not be held in Gujarat.
Two Gandhinagar citizens, Virendrasinh Vaghela and Jagdish Bhatt, had filed a petition on October 9 challenging the Ordinance. Congress' national spokesperson and High Court lawyer Shaktisinh Gohil appeared as council for the petitioners.
The Congress was quick to call High Court verdict as “historical and path breaking”, while the BJP kept quiet, refusing to comment. Gohil said, in a hurriedly called press conference, “The Anandiben Patel government has been unduly delaying local body polls in Gujarat because the atmosphere was not politically conducive to it.”
Earlier, the High Court put on hold a controversial law, passed in the Gujarat state assembly, to make voting in local body elections compulsory.
While declaring the Ordinance void, the High Court noted that the state government had no powers to hand over power to administrators instead of elected representatives, pointing out that the Ordinance violated clause 15 and 257 of the Gujarat Panchayat Act.
Following the High Court’s verdict, the SEC sought a stay on the order citing that the state government might be keen to approach the Supreme Court. Gohil challenged the argument, saying that this would only “violate the spirit of the Constitution.” The High Court declined to entertain the SEC plea.
This is for the first time since October 2001, when Narendra Modi took charge of the Gujarat BJP as the chief minister that the ruling party seemed to be running scared of polls. In fact, after Modi took over power, the Election Commission of India rejected state government plea for polls citing widespread communal clashes, which Modi opposed tooth and nail.

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”