Skip to main content

Land ceiling bill meant to "help" industrialists set up shop, easily sell land: Internal Gujarat govt note

By Rajiv Shah
An internal Gujarat government note, prepared by the state revenue department and in possession of Counterview, has admitted that the recent amendments to the state’s land various ceiling Acts are meant to “enable the industrialist to speedily establish industry”, in such a way that the industrialist could “purchase” the land for industrial purpose “without prior permission of the district collector.”
In order to do this, it said, it has amended Section 63 AA of Mumbai Tenancy Administration and Agriculture Land Act, 1948; Section 55 of Saurashtra Gharkhed, Tenancy Administration and Agriculture Land Act, 1949; and Section 89-A of Mumbai Tenancy Administration and Agriculture Land (Vidarbh Pradesh and Kutch region), 1958.
The amendments await President Pranab Kumar Mukherjee’s nod before they could become legal entities. The Gujarat governor refused to sign the amendments, and instead sent them to the Government of India for approval, as they invited wide-scale criticism of favouring industry at the cost of farmers.
The internal note says, “According to the prevailing provisions, a certificate is given by the collector to the purchaser of the agriculture land for industrial purpose”, and “the industrial activity has to be started within three years and production of goods /providing services has to be done within five years.”
Pointing towards the current hassle, the note says, “The government, after having considered the price paid for the purchase of the land, would pay compensation and enter the land of such industry in the government account and can dispose the land” if there is a “failure in starting the industrial activity within three years and production of the goods/providing services within five years.”
Giving reasons why “legal amendments” had become necessary, the note says, currently, “bona fide industrialists are facing difficulties/hardships due to the less time period limitation to start the industry.” And, “due to the changing circumstances and not starting the industry timely, the industrialist cannot sell such purchased private lands and, thus, despite of the circumstances beyond control, they cannot sell the land and end up with economic crises.”
Secondly, according to the note, “There is also no clear provision for the industrial park”, nor is there any “clear provision that the after having purchased the land for the industrial park, the land is developed and can be sold to other industrial units. Thus, it was found, is a necessity to make provision in the law for industrial park.”
In order to avoid these difficulties, the note says, “If the purchaser of the land wishes, he can give an equity/part in the proportion of the cost of the land to the farmer selling the land. This is just an enabling provision, vide which an opportunity of mutual partnership is created between the industrialist and the farmer and this would create ‘win-win’ situation for both which would provide the motivational force in the industrial development of the state.”
Then, the note states, a new provision of starting industrial activity under which the “time limit of starting production or providing services be totally five years, and on the basis of the application of the industrialist, such time period can be further extended for the period for two years (one year at a time) without charging any amount.”
But if, during this period, which totals “seven years, including the extension period”, the industry is not started, “a provision is made to extend such time limit for the period of three years by charging 50 per cent of the amount of jantri.” Jantri is the government assessment of the value of land, revised periodically, and is generally very low compared to the market rate.
Further, says the note, “If the industrialist cannot start the production/provide services for whatever reasons, he can sell such self-purchased land for industrial purpose. Interestingly, this can be done “after three years”, on payment of an amount to the state government – 40 per cent of the jantri between three to five years, 60 per cent of the jantri between five and seven years, and 100 per cent of the jantri for more than seven years.
Coming to the need for industrial parks, which are being developed in Gujarat “in order to make the industrial development of the state”, the note says, the existing laws do not allow the promoter to “sell the plots of such industrial park to another industrialist”, hence the government's “goal of development of such industrial parks, is not fulfilled.”
Under the new provisions, the note says, “The lands purchased for the purpose of industrial park could be sold to other industrial units.” Of course, the developer has to create “infrastructure facilities subject to the terms and conditions decided by the Industrial Commissioner” within three years after the purchase of the land, but if he “fails to fulfill the conditions, “the government could take over the land after paying the compensation as decided by the government.”

Comments

TRENDING

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.