Skip to main content

Ernst & Young rates India best investment destination, but says 10% non-established players aware of 'Make in India'

By Our Representative
One of the world’s top consultants, Ernst and Young (EY), known for catering to the “requirements” of its clients who include both government and global business players, has rated India as the best investment destination in the world. In a survey carried out among 505 business executives form 28 countries, E&Y has said “A leading 32 per cent of the investors ranked India as the most attractive market this year.”
Titled “EY’s attractiveness survey India 2015: Ready, set, grow”, and brought out ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s scheduled visit to the United Kingdom (UK) in November second week, EY survey finds that less than half the “decision makers” that of India – just about 15 per cent – considered China as the as the most best investment destination.
This is followed by Southeast Asia 12 per cent), Brazil (5 per cent), North America (10 per cent), Latin America (3 per cent), the Middle East (four per cent), Western Europe 4 per cent, Japan 3 per cent, and Russia 1 per cent. The survey was carried out with the help of business executives, government leaders, and EY professionals.”
The main issues addressed in the survey included whether labour costs, domestic market, macroeconomic stability, labour skills, stable political and social environment, research and development availability, FDI policy, ease of doing business, flexibility in labour law, and so on. 
Impact of India's economic reforms on attracting FDI
An earlier World Bank report, which also ranked India as the best business destination, had specifically mentioned that it had taken the help of the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Government of India, for preparing the report. While, the EY report refrains from saying any such thing, two of its top commentators are Amitabh Kant, secretary, DIPP, and S Jaishankar, India’s foreign secretary.
It is, however, well known that EY was one of the topmost clients of the Gujarat government under the chief ministership of Narendra Modi, and promoted Gujarat’s high-profile biennial Vibrant Gujarat global investment summits worldwide between 2003 and 2013, dishing out propaganda material and organizing meetings with business executives for Modi.
EY’s chairman, India region, Rajiv Memani, in the foreword, says, the report reflects outcomes of Modi’s visits to “about 30 countries since May 2014, including India’s primary sources of FDI: the US, Japan, Germany, China, Korea and Australia.”
He adds, “We’ve seen a sharp turnaround in FDI in 2014. After declining for two successive years, investment in India has bounced back with a 32% growth to US$25b — significantly ahead of the 7% growth in FDI seen globally. Further, with FDI capital inflows of US$30.8b during the first half of calendar year 2015, India has emerged as the number one FDI destination in the world.”
In the chapter, “FDI in India: A V shaped recovery”, the report, however, admits, that India is still below the 2011 in FDI investment level. It says, “Though still far below the 2011 peak, the number of FDI projects rose 37% in 2014, with a proportional increase in jobs created by FDI.”
“The upturn marks a significant change from 2012 and 2013, when slow economic growth, regulatory hurdles, lack of transparency and policy paralysis had deterred investors. Investor confidence in India has been strengthened by improving economic growth and investor-friendly moves by the new Government”, the report points out.
However, there are still issues, it indicates: “Investors have generally been cautious. In 2014, the average project involved an investment of US$37m, compared with US$40m in 2012 and US$53m in 2010. Investors are positive but wary and keen to see real improvements in the business environment.”
“The uptick in FDI projects into India contrasts with a 3 per cent slide in the number of FDI projects worldwide, while it outpaced the 17% rise across the Asia-Pacific region. After a steep fall in 2013, FDI in manufacturing grew at its fastest in seven years”, the report says, adding, “In 2014, investors announced plans to invest a total of US$11.4b in 192 FDI projects, creating more than 67,000 jobs.”
The survey found that of the 505 business executives interviewed, 55 per cent were aware of the Make in India programme. However, it regrets, “There is a need to create visibility for the campaign among non-established players, as only 10 per cent of those without a presence in India were aware of it.”

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Would those charged for illegally demolishing Babri now manage a new Ram temple?

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
The long-awaited verdict on the contentious issue of the disputed land in Ayodhya was finally delivered by the Supreme Court on November 9, 2019. The judgement has come after a 70-year-old conflict filled with acrimony, divisiveness, hate and violence between sections of the Hindus and Muslims of the country. At the core of the issue was the Ram Mandir – Babri Masjid dispute: was there a temple on the place where the Masjid was built? To whom should the land be given to?