Skip to main content

"Repeal" Gujarat anti-terror bill, it's "incompatible" with human rights norms

By Our Representative
Top human rights body, Amnesty International, has asked the President of India to reject the new anti-terror bill, passed in the Gujarat state assembly last month-end. Calling it "draconian", Amnesty said, it "falls far short of international human rights standards." It also demanded, "Similar laws already in force in other states and nationally must be immediately repealed."
Called the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GUJTCOC) Bill, 2015, it needs presidential assent to become law. Amnesty said, “Political parties have tried to paint the passing of the bill as a political tussle. But unfortunately, several parties have been guilty of supporting similar laws at the state and national level,” he said, pointing out that "the GUJTCOC bill is based on similar laws in force in the states of Maharashtra and Karnataka."
Specifically referring to the the objectionable provisions in the GUJTCOC bill which are "incompatible with international human rights standards, and must be repealed or extensively revised", Amnesty said, these include the definitions of terrorism, which include acts “committed with the intention to disturb…public order”, or “likely to cause…loss of, or damage to, or destruction of, property”.
Similarly, Amnesty said, "The definition of abetment in the bill covers a range of activities including 'communication or association with any person' assisting an organized crime syndicate, or publishing 'without any lawful authority, any information likely to assist an organized crime syndicate'.”
According to Amnesty, "These broad definitions could threaten several basic rights, including the rights to freedom of expression and association. Organizing a demonstration or protest critical of the government could be labelled and prosecuted as an act of terrorism under the overly broad definition used in the bill. Writing a journalistic report on an act of terrorism could be prosecuted as abetment."
"Any definition of terrorism and related acts should be exact and legally precise", Amnesty said, adding, "Counter-terrorism measures should be necessary and proportionate to countering specific threats of terrorism."
It said, "The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – to which India is a state party – has been interpreted by the UN Human Rights Committee as requiring states to ensure that counter-terrorism measures do not lead to unnecessary or disproportionate interference with freedom of expression."
According to Amnesty, Section 20 (2) of the bill seeks to "extend the minimum period of detention of suspects from 15 days to 30 days and the maximum period of detention without charge from 90 days – already far beyond international standards - to 180 days." And, "the only safeguard provided is that the court should satisfy itself from the prosecution about the progress made in the investigation and the specific reasons for the detention beyond 90 days."
"The possibility of long periods of detention without charge increases the risk of torture and other ill-treatment in custody. Such violations have frequently taken place during similar detention in Gujarat and other states. A longer period of pre-charge detention cannot be a substitute for more effective policing and investigation", Amnesty said.
Then, said Amnesty, Section 16 of the bill "seeks to make a confession made by a detainee to a police officer at or above the rank of Superintendent admissible as evidence in court, subject to certain conditions." It added, "Under ordinary Indian criminal law, confessions made to the police are not admissible as evidence because of fears that they may be obtained through torture or other ill-treatment."
Further, Section 14 of the bill states that evidence collected “through the interception of wire, electronic or oral communication under the provisions of any other law shall be admissible as evidence against the accused” in court. Objecting to it, Amnesty said, "Interception of communications can interfere with the right to freedom of expression and association and the right to individual privacy" and "violates international human rights standards."

Comments

TRENDING

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

"Misleading" satellite images being shared on Balakot surgical strike on Jaish camp

By Dr Vinay Kate*
With every passing day more questions are being raised about the surgical strike India did in Balakot as a response to Pulwama attacks. So far the Indian media has claimed mass casulaty of 300+ terrorists of Jaish-e-Mohammad in this surgical strike, but there is hardly any report from foreign media about the same.

Extreme repression, corporate loot, cultural genocide "characterise" India's tribal belt

Counterview Desk
As Lok Sabha polls approach, there is considerable ferment in one section of the population -- India's Adivasis, forming about 8.6 per cent of India's population. Things became particularly critical following the February 14, 2019 Supreme Court order, allegedly seeking to evict lakhs of tribals from their forest lands.

Industry in India "barely growing", export growth 0%, whither moral anchors?

Counterview Desk
In a sharp critique of the Modi government, the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), one of world renowned economist Prof Kaushik Basu, who is Professor of Economics and Carl Marks Professor of International Studies at Cornell University, has told students at the IIM-A’s 54th Annual Convocation on March 16, 2019 that they have a “special responsibility” on their shoulders, “the responsibility to reject narrow sectarianism, uphold scientific thinking, openness to new ideas, and freedom of speech.”

Gujarat model? Industrial effluents "invade" borewells, discharge coloured water in farms

By Rajiv Shah
In a major embarrassment for Gujarat model, of the 21 samples taken by officials of the state government's environmental watchdog Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) in two villages of Vadodara district and analyzed by its laboratory in Gandhinagar, the state capital, to find out pollution level in groundwater, 16 were assessed as highly contaminated – these were, in fact, found to be discharging reddish, brownish, reddish, or yellowish water.

Refugees as criminals? US govt report blames Amit Shah for calling Bangladeshis termites

Counterview Desk
The chapter “Freedom of Movement” of the US State Department’s “India 2018 Human Rights Report”, released recently, has criticized BJP chief Amit Shah for terming alleged Bangladeshis who may be in Assam as “termites”, because their names were struck down from the list of National Register of Citizens, under preparation in the state.
Pointing out that four million residents were excluded from Assam’s final draft list, leading to “uncertainty over the status of these individuals, many of whose families had lived in the state for several generations”, the report regrets, the Indian law does not even contain the term “refugee,” treating refugees like Rohingiyas as “any other foreigners.”
“Undocumented physical presence in the country is a criminal offense. Persons without documentation were vulnerable to forced returns and abuse”, the report says.
Text of the Freedom of Movement chapter: The law provides for freedom of internal movement, foreign travel, emigration, a…

Congress would win just 9 of 26 Lok Sabha seats: Gujarat Assembly segment-wise analysis

By Rajiv Shah
Even as the Congress plans its first working committee meet in Gujarat on February 28 after an almost 58 year gap, there is reason to wonder what is in store for India’s grand old party in a state which has been long been a BJP bastion – in fact ever since mid-1990s. Ahead of the then assembly polls in late 2012, talking with me, a senior Gujarat Congress leader, currently Rajya Sabha MP, frankly said he saw no reason why Congress would win.

"Pro-corporate" Supreme Court order on FRA would further marginalize Adivasis

By VS Roy David, JP Raju*
For millions of Adivasis and other traditional forest dwellers February 13, 2019 will go down in history as the day of apocalypse. This is like the proverbial Black Friday where millions of most marginalized people of India were ordered by malicious anti-people draconian Supreme Court order depriving them the life and livelihood by evicting them from their habitats.

Financial inclusion? Not micro-loans; India's poor "need" investment in health, education

By Moin Qazi*
India has grown into a global powerhouse. Its economy is soaring but the picture on the ground is still quite arid. The green shoots that you see are only a patch of its landscape. Most Indians are hapless victims of inequity. India is one country where intense poverty abounds in the shadow of immense wealth.

India, Pakistan told to eliminate nuclear weapons: N-war "would kill" 2 billion

Counterview Desk
The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), a non-partisan federation of national medical organizations in 64 countries, representing tens of thousands of doctors, medical students, other health workers, and concerned citizens, claiming to share the common goal of creating a more peaceful and secure world freed from the threat of nuclear annihilation, has warned that “an unprecedented global catastrophe” awaits the globe against the backdrop of warmongering in India and Pakistan.