Skip to main content

"Repeal" Gujarat anti-terror bill, it's "incompatible" with human rights norms

By Our Representative
Top human rights body, Amnesty International, has asked the President of India to reject the new anti-terror bill, passed in the Gujarat state assembly last month-end. Calling it "draconian", Amnesty said, it "falls far short of international human rights standards." It also demanded, "Similar laws already in force in other states and nationally must be immediately repealed."
Called the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GUJTCOC) Bill, 2015, it needs presidential assent to become law. Amnesty said, “Political parties have tried to paint the passing of the bill as a political tussle. But unfortunately, several parties have been guilty of supporting similar laws at the state and national level,” he said, pointing out that "the GUJTCOC bill is based on similar laws in force in the states of Maharashtra and Karnataka."
Specifically referring to the the objectionable provisions in the GUJTCOC bill which are "incompatible with international human rights standards, and must be repealed or extensively revised", Amnesty said, these include the definitions of terrorism, which include acts “committed with the intention to disturb…public order”, or “likely to cause…loss of, or damage to, or destruction of, property”.
Similarly, Amnesty said, "The definition of abetment in the bill covers a range of activities including 'communication or association with any person' assisting an organized crime syndicate, or publishing 'without any lawful authority, any information likely to assist an organized crime syndicate'.”
According to Amnesty, "These broad definitions could threaten several basic rights, including the rights to freedom of expression and association. Organizing a demonstration or protest critical of the government could be labelled and prosecuted as an act of terrorism under the overly broad definition used in the bill. Writing a journalistic report on an act of terrorism could be prosecuted as abetment."
"Any definition of terrorism and related acts should be exact and legally precise", Amnesty said, adding, "Counter-terrorism measures should be necessary and proportionate to countering specific threats of terrorism."
It said, "The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – to which India is a state party – has been interpreted by the UN Human Rights Committee as requiring states to ensure that counter-terrorism measures do not lead to unnecessary or disproportionate interference with freedom of expression."
According to Amnesty, Section 20 (2) of the bill seeks to "extend the minimum period of detention of suspects from 15 days to 30 days and the maximum period of detention without charge from 90 days – already far beyond international standards - to 180 days." And, "the only safeguard provided is that the court should satisfy itself from the prosecution about the progress made in the investigation and the specific reasons for the detention beyond 90 days."
"The possibility of long periods of detention without charge increases the risk of torture and other ill-treatment in custody. Such violations have frequently taken place during similar detention in Gujarat and other states. A longer period of pre-charge detention cannot be a substitute for more effective policing and investigation", Amnesty said.
Then, said Amnesty, Section 16 of the bill "seeks to make a confession made by a detainee to a police officer at or above the rank of Superintendent admissible as evidence in court, subject to certain conditions." It added, "Under ordinary Indian criminal law, confessions made to the police are not admissible as evidence because of fears that they may be obtained through torture or other ill-treatment."
Further, Section 14 of the bill states that evidence collected “through the interception of wire, electronic or oral communication under the provisions of any other law shall be admissible as evidence against the accused” in court. Objecting to it, Amnesty said, "Interception of communications can interfere with the right to freedom of expression and association and the right to individual privacy" and "violates international human rights standards."

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Did Netaji turn blind eye to Japanese massacre while in Andaman during World War-II?

Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani museum off Chandigarh By Rajiv Shah  Did Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ignore the massacre carried out by the Japanese army in Andaman and Nicobar islands during the Second World War? It would seem so, if one goes by the account of Mohinder Singh Dhillon, who authored a book in memory of his father, 'A Titan in the Andamans, Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani'. Dr Diwan Singh was tortured to death by the Japanese soldiers in the cellular jail in Andaman in 1944.

Sweden-backed study: India won't achieve 2030 UN goals, officials can't recognise SDG

By Rajiv Shah  A Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC)-sponsored study, carried out by the advocacy group Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) India, seeking to analyse the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No 12, Responsible Consumption and Production (RCP), has regretted, it is "very unlikely" India will achieve any of the targets of SDG 12 by 2030 "unless some serious measures are taken by the government to reverse the present trend."

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Why Church in India today needs a Rutilio Grande, martyred for stance on social justice

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  For the people of El Salvador, January 22, 2022 will be more than just a red-letter day. Three of their sons, Jesuit Fr Rutilio Grande and his two lay associates 72-year-old Manuel Solorzano and 15-year-old Nelson Rutilio Lemus (and Italian Franciscan missionary Fr Cosme Spessotto who was also martyred) will be beatified in San Salvador.

'Dargah site was a temple': Claim in Gujarat following post-Babri verdict demands in UP

By Rajiv Shah  Will Gujarat also see demands to replace mosques and dargahs with Hindu temples? It would seem so, if a new fact-finding team conclusion is any indication. Apprehending the “danger” of communal conflagration, it has cited the claim on a 15th century dargah was originally a Hindu temple – allegedly quite on line with what has been happening in UP following the Supreme Court verdict on Babri Mosque.

Modi's Gujarat 'ignores' India's biggest donor of Azad Hind Fauj, Dhoraji's Habib Sheth

By Dr Hari Desai* One surely feels happy that the statue of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is being installed near the India Gate in New Delhi. Every Indian and even Netaji’s 79-year-old daughter Prof Anita Bose Pfaff feels happy about the statue at the most important area of the capital. In an interview with an Indian TV, Anita, who is a German citizen, mentions that she thinks if not Netaji’s only Mahatma Gandhi’s statue should have been there. She may be aware that there existed a plan to install life-sized statue of the Father of the Nation at that place.  Even after differences with Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel which led Netaji to leave the Indian National Congress, Bose was the first person to call Mahtma Gandhi Father of the Nation on July 6,1944 in his Ragoon Radio broadcast, and sought Bapu’s blessings as the Supreme Commander of the Indian National Army (INA). Till 1968 there was statue of King George V at India Gate. It was removed and placed in the Coronation Park, New Del

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Is it time to celebrate India's 'improved' sex ratio? Reasons to question NFHS data

By Aditi Chaudhary*  The recently published National Family Health Survey (NFHS) factsheet brought cheers amongst the public and the government. With Child Sex ratio (number of females per 1000 males in the age group 0 - 6 years) and overall sex ratio (the total number of females per 1000 males), both showing an improvement, NFHS-5 (2019-21) got applauded by all around.

Stop harassment, release Kashmir rights defender Khurram Parvez: Global NGO

By Our Representative  Ahead of his hearing on January 21, 2022, CIVICUS , a global civil society alliance with more than 10,000 members worldwide, has called upon the Government of India to “immediately and unconditionally” release human rights defender Khurram Parvez. “The judicial harassment he is facing highlights the repressive environment for activists and critics in Indian administered Jammu and Kashmir”, it said in a statement.