Skip to main content

Law criminalizing cow slaughter, possession of beef "violates" state's mandate not to enforce religious practices on people

By Our Representative
Thirty senior citizens have challenged the Maharashtra government’s recent decision to ban cow slaughter and possession of beef as a non-bailable offence, saying the whole purpose of the ban is to “implement” a certain version of Hindu belief, which may not be acceptable to all. Filing a petition in the Bombay High Court, they say, the ban is “in violation of the basic structure of the Constitution of India which mandates the state not to make law towards enforcement of a particular religious practice.”
Consisting of some of the most well-known activists, writers, researchers and professionals based in Maharashtra, and filed through advocates Mihir Desai and Rebecca Gonsalvez, the petitioners say that the ban is in “violation of Article 51A (f) of the Constitution of India, which requires citizens to cherish the rich composite culture of India.”
They add, the ban order goes so far as to even criminalizes even the very possession of beef, including the one slaughtered outside Maharashtra – and all this under the “wrong” belief that “the Hindu religion does not permit eating of beef.”
Under the new law, according to the petitioners, even if one “purchases cooked or raw beef, or tinned beef in the State of Goa, where the slaughter of bulls and bullocks is permitted, which purchase is perfectly legal in Goa, and brings the same into Maharashtra, one would be committing an offence under the newly added section 5D.”
Pointing out that “one would then be arrested, and languish in jail in view of the offence being a non-bailable one, merely for possessing a tin of beef”, the petitioners says, this equally applies to even tinned beef purchased in the USA, where the slaughter of cows, bulls and bullocks is legal.”
Taking exception to making mere possession of beef a criminal, non-bailable offence in the State of Maharashtra punishable with imprisonment up to one year and fine up to Rs 2000, the petitioners say, this “encroaches upon the fundamental right of the petitioners to consume beef in the State of Maharashtra.”
Saying that the slaughter of bulls and bullocks was “permitted in the State of Maharashtra prior to March 4, 2015, subject to certain conditions”, the petitioners object to the introduction of a new section 5B to the existing law on cow slaughter, which “prohibits the sale/ disposal of any cow, bull or bullock for slaughter and impacts the availability of beef in Maharashtra.”
According to them, “The right to eat the food of one’s choice is an integral part of the right to life and personal liberty. Beef has been an essential part of the diet of some of the petitioners for years together. Some of the petitioners have traditionally eaten beef.”
Therefore, they say, the introduction of certain sections is an “encroachment on the fundamental right to life and personal liberty of the petitioners, their right to eat the food of their choice, food which they have eaten all their lives and is an essential part of their diets”.
Pointing out towards economic reasons for consuming beef, which is also their most important source of protein, the petitioners say, it was the “cheapest form of non-vegetarian food”, costing just Rs 120 per kg before it was banned, as against fish, chicken, mutton and lamb which range from Rs 175 to Rs 500 or more. “Even economically, there is no substitute for beef”, they insist.

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

'First time' since 1970s poverty up 10%, consumer spending down 4%: GoI survey

By Our Representative
In what may prove to be a major embarrassment for the Government of India (GoI), a new official survey, carried out in 207-18, has reportedly said that average consumer spending in India fell by more than 4% the previous six years "primarily driven by slackening rural demand." The survey, "Key Indicators: Household Consumer Expenditure in India”, carried out by the National Statistical Office (NSO), says that money spent per person in a month fell by 3.7% from Rs 1,501 in 2011-12 to Rs 1,446 in 2017-18.

As fear 'grips' right liberals, Arvind Panagariya, too, would be declared anti-national?

By Rajiv Shah
It is surely well-known by now that India's top people in the power-that-be have been castigating all those who disagree with them as "anti-nationals". Nothing unusual. If till yesterday only "secular liberals", and "left-liberals" were declared anti-national, facts, however, appear to have begun surfacing that, now, guns are being trained against those who could be qualified as right liberals, too. Let me be specific.

National award winning film 'Hellaro' co-produced by three chartered accountants

By Our Representative
“Hellaro”, a Gujarati feature film produced by Saarthi Productions in association with Harfanmaula Films (Ahmedabad) was declared as the Best Feature Film at the National Film Awards which was conferred by the Government of India. The film also won the Special Jury Award for the Best Actress to all the 13 actresses of the film.
Ashish Patel produced the movie, which has been co-produced three co-producers, Aayush Patel, Prateek Gupta and Mit Jani, all of whom, interestingly, started their filmmaking journey after becoming Chartered Accountants in 2012.
“Hellaro” is directed by Abhishek Shah, who has been working in Gujarati theatre since the past 17 years as writer, director and actor and has received numerous awards for his plays. He has also worked as a casting director for 12 films.
“Hellaro” is a period drama based in Kutch and has been co-written by Abhishek Shah and Prateek Gupta. Gupta previously received the Best Debut Director Award, along with Mit Jan…