Skip to main content

Gujarat construction workers' "welfare"? Rs 909 crore lying 'idle' since 2006, just nine of 600 paid death compensation

By A Representative
The Gujarat government has admitted that the state has so far failed to make any progress towards providing basic welfare facilities to an estimated 20 lakh construction workers, despite the fact that the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, which was activated in the state in 2006. Addressing a well-attended workshop on construction workers, a senior state official admitted, “huge cess fund” has been collected by the state government for the welfare of the construction workers, but all of it has remained unused.
Gujarat Building & Other Construction Workers Welfare Board (GBOCWWB) chairman Dr Anil Patel told the participants that a major reason why the cess – Rs 909 crore – remains unutilized with the board is there was “failure” to go ahead with the plans to register construction workers with the board because of “technical reasons.” He claimed, now the problem has been “identified” and the campaign to register the construction workers has finally begun.
The admission came even as Vipul Pandya of Bhandkam Mazdur Sangathan (BMS) revealed, quoting official figures, that of the Rs 909 crore collected as cess and lying with the GBOCWWB for construction workers’ welfare since 2006, just about Rs 9 crore has been spent. This year, he added, another Rs 346 crore would be added to the fund.
“One of the major components of the welfare fund is compensation against accidental death amounting to Rs 2 lakh. As against 600 accidental deaths that have taken place across Gujarat since 2008, just nine have so far been paid the compensation. We believe the amount is quite small, and it should be increased to Rs 4 lakh”, he said.
Attended by different stakeholders -- trade union and NGO representatives, builder’ and construction association representatives, and the state government’s labour department officials -- an analysis of the data at the workshop said, 46 per cent of the deaths the construction workers fell down from the top of the site, 19 per cent because wall collapsed or the earth caved in, 17 per cent because of an object fell on the worker, and seven per cent because of electric shock.
Patel, who called himself “new to the subject”, saying is more an “intern” trying to understand the construction workers’ problems, said, the accidents at construction sites were four to five times those of other industrial accidents. However, he sought to blame it on workers: “Construction workers working at sites of such renowned builders like Larsen & Toubro or Bakeri are known to do give safety instruments. But I have noticed that many of them rarely wear them”.
Source RTI. Incomplete figures as several cities
did not provide any information
Participants said, officials blame failure to pay compensation on workers not being registered with the GBOCWWB. Blaming this on a highly indifferent government bureaucracy, they added, the law to collect cess came into force in 2006, and till 2008, just about 600 workers were registered. Thereafter, the trade unions were given the powers to register workers. 
“As a result, 40,000 forms were filled up, of which 20,000 were registered. Then, suddenly, the powers from the trade unions were taken away, and the registration process came to a standstill. The workers registered were deregistered, as it is valid for just three years”, they pointed out.
“The process of registering workers again began in December 2014. According to our estimate, 70,000 have filled up necessary forms out of a total of 20 lakh construction workers. Of these nearly 30 per cent have so far been registered”, Pandya said.
Others added, the problem has become complicated because of “frequent changes brought about by the Gujarat government in its forms. “If a worker fills up a self-certified form as a construction worker as required, the labour office often doesn’t accept it saying it is not in proper format. Where would the workers – 70 per cent of whom are from outside Gujarat and the rest are mainly state adivasis – go in such a situation?”
According to the law, once the worker is registered, apart from the benefit of Rs 2 lakh on accidental death, she or he is entitled to several benefits on getting a Red Book, including cheap ration from the fair price shop, free medical aid, money to educate children, and maternity benefit of Rs 3,000 to women.
Jayanthi Ravi, state labour commissioner, who wound up the workshop, said the format of the form has again being changed to an electronic card with a bar code, which NGOs and trade unionists objected, saying, the Red Book would be “much better” as here the workers knew what all benefits they have received and are going to receive.

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."