Skip to main content

Biometric aadhaar is linked to land acquisition, land titling: Inform Supreme Court about violation of its orders

By Gopal Krishna*
The questionable 12-digit biometric unique identity (UID)/aadhaar number cannot be made mandatory for any government service, according to the Supreme Court orders of September 23, 2013, November 26, 2013, March 24, 2014 and March 16, 2015. Yet, so far opposition parties have failed to note that biometric aadhaar number is linked to legislations on land acquisition and land titling.
It is abundantly clear that the biometric aadhaar number case has become the litmus test to demonstrate whether rule of law still exists in India or biometric surveillance companies have subverted Indian legal and political system for good. In the current situation, it is the moral and political duty of the genuine opposition parties to ensure that aadhaar is abandoned.
It is noteworthy that Section 10 and 36 of the land titling bill is linked to aadhaar. It has been disclosed in writing by the government that new land acquisition law was meant to create a "perfect land market", and by former chairman, Unique Identity Authority of India (UIDAI), that national ID will help create a common land market, which he will have us believe reduce poverty. If any citizen of India has been denied or being denied any entitlement or government service because she he doesn't have 12 digit biometric UID/aadhaar number, the Supreme Court must be informed about it (fax and email: supremecourt@nic.in ).
The message must mention, "For the kind attention of Hon'ble Mr Justice Chelameswar and companion judges hearing the matter regarding aadhaar, in the matter of Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 833 of 2013 and 494 of 2012". The submissions need to be made before April 30.
The attached order of Chief Justice bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No 569 of 2013 dated March 2, 2013 established that when the High Court raised questions of legality of aadhaar, the Union of India withdrew the circular making aadhaar mandatory for acceptance of application for registration of vehicle and learner/regular driving license. By implication this is relevant to all the departments and agencies which are making aadhaar mandatory.
The fact is there is a compelling logic for abandoning the biometric aadhaar project the way it has been done in UK, China, Australia, France, USA and Philippines. UIDAI has been severely indicted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance in its report placed before Parliament. The Standing Committee rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill which sought to legitimize UIDAI's illegal status post facto. It observed that while framing of relevant law is under way, the continuance of the UID/aadhaar project is "unethical and violation of Parliament's prerogatives".
The collection of biometric and personal data and issuing of aadhaar/UID numbers do not have any statutory sanction until the Bill is passed by Parliament. It is noteworthy that EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India, wrote to the Prime Minister, "Government's right to collect information relating to individual citizens, unless necessitated by national security considerations, arises from its role as a trustee on behalf of the citizens.”
He adds, “As such, the relevant information has a great deal of sanctity attached to it. The government holds such information in a purely fiduciary capacity. The citizen's privacy cannot therefore be wantonly and irresponsibly violated by a fiat of executive instructions initiated at the instance of individuals who are more interested in inducting private agencies not accountable to the people and the legislature, than upholding the public interest."
Sarma says, "It is bizarre that the government should first collect personal information from unsuspecting citizens as a trustee and then surreptitiously pass on the ownership of such information to a private agency, guided more by the profit motive than the public interest. It is equally bizarre that the government should demote its own role to that of a customer of the private company in seeking access to the information base. All this amounts to a gross breach of the trust reposed by the citizens in the government.”
According to him, “The proposal becomes all the more dubious in view of the monopolistic status sought to be given to the private agency ‘owning’ the citizens' information in its hands. I feel that the proposal is an ominous one as it would involve an outright handing over of the citizens' private information to a few private agencies whose motives could never be gauged and who have no accountability to the legislature. It is a proposal that should be rejected forthwith without any hesitation."
He concludes saying, "I get the uncomfortable feeling that it forms part of a more dubious scheme being contemplated by your government. If the government persists with this scheme, I will not hesitate to seek judicial intervention in this matter."
Although belated in the aftermath of disclosures by Wikileaks, Edward Snowden, Citizen Four, Grec Greenwald and the surveillance of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose by MI 5 after independence, now that the fearful ramifications are visible on the horizon, the question is who is stopping non-Congress and non-BJP ruled states from unsigning the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that they have signed with UIDAI.
It is noteworthy that one of the most successful examples of implementation of biometric identification is Pakistan. What has improved in Pakistan due to its implementation? Even SIM cards in Pakistan are done based on biometric identification. The current government is following the footprints of an experiment which has been tried, tested and failed.
---
*Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), New Delhi. Contact: krishnagreen@gmail.com@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

India reaches 8th of 10 stage genocide: US Muslim advocacy group raises 'alert'

By Hena Zuberi* India has reached the 8th stage of genocide with the persecution of the Muslim community. Stating this, Professor Greg Stanton, who heads Genocide Watch, declared a Genocide Emergency Alert for India today at Justice For All online briefing.

Anti-poor? 'Cumbersome' to link aadhaar, voter ID for people sans internet access

By Prashant Kumar Chaudhary, Ajit Kumar Jaiswal*  At present, technology plays an increasingly crucial part in modelling human existence by offering a variety of solutions to many of the challenges individuals confront in the real world. As a result, every branch of research works to provides means to solve these difficulties precisely and efficiently. The Central government works along the same lines as well.

'Dargah site was a temple': Claim in Gujarat following post-Babri verdict demands in UP

By Rajiv Shah  Will Gujarat also see demands to replace mosques and dargahs with Hindu temples? It would seem so, if a new fact-finding team conclusion is any indication. Apprehending the “danger” of communal conflagration, it has cited the claim on a 15th century dargah was originally a Hindu temple – allegedly quite on line with what has been happening in UP following the Supreme Court verdict on Babri Mosque.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Why Church in India today needs a Rutilio Grande, martyred for stance on social justice

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  For the people of El Salvador, January 22, 2022 will be more than just a red-letter day. Three of their sons, Jesuit Fr Rutilio Grande and his two lay associates 72-year-old Manuel Solorzano and 15-year-old Nelson Rutilio Lemus (and Italian Franciscan missionary Fr Cosme Spessotto who was also martyred) will be beatified in San Salvador.

Sweden-backed study: India won't achieve 2030 UN goals, officials can't recognise SDG

By Rajiv Shah  A Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC)-sponsored study, carried out by the advocacy group Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) India, seeking to analyse the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No 12, Responsible Consumption and Production (RCP), has regretted, it is "very unlikely" India will achieve any of the targets of SDG 12 by 2030 "unless some serious measures are taken by the government to reverse the present trend."

Gender insensitive? Model Gujarat's cyclone relief package ignores 40,000 fisherwomen

CSJ volunteers talking to fisherwomen By Rajiv Shah  A Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) note on the Gujarat government’s compensation package to the victims of the devastating Tauktae cyclone, which hit the coastal belt of Saurashtra's Amerli, Rajula, Una, and Gir-Somnath districts in May 2021, has said, the relief offered was so terribly inadequate that many of the fisherfolk were not able to fish for the rest of the year.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Haridwar call for genocide direct result of Modi 'tolerating' Islamophobic policies

By Our Representative  A high-level briefing organised in Washington DC, in which as many as 17 human rights and interfaith organizations -- including Amnesty International USA, Genocide Watch and Hindus for Human Rights, apart from several persons in their individual capacity -- participated, has come down heavily on what they called "Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Islamophobic policies and tolerance of open incitement by Hindu extremists for a genocide of Muslims."