India's nuclear ambitions: Questions that demand answers

By Shankar Sharma*

India has set an ambitious target of expanding its nuclear power capacity from the current 9,000 MW to 100,000 MW over the next 20 years. The recently enacted has added fresh momentum to this push. However, these developments have also raised serious and credible concerns among environmentalists and civil society groups across the country.

Several factors worry these groups — ranging from safety and to financial costs and the . These concerns deserve open, honest engagement from the authorities, not dismissal.

A pattern worth noting in the nuclear sector is that whenever one technology runs into problems, its advocates tend to pivot to the next promising alternative. Today, that alternative is , or . But a closer look reveals that SMRs carry their own set of unresolved issues. In fact, any nuclear technology — old or new — brings with it broadly the same basket of concerns for society, even if the scale or nature of those concerns may vary.

According to a , achieving the 100 GW nuclear target by 2047 will require an investment of Rs 25 lakh crore and sweeping policy reforms. This is an enormous commitment of both financial and natural resources. It is therefore essential that all societal concerns are addressed satisfactorily before our communities are locked into this path.

At the same time, we should not overlook the inspiring example right within our own country. has emerged as a shining star in India's renewable energy story. The state did not merely participate in the — it helped write the rulebook. This demonstrates that clean, sustainable electricity is not a distant dream but an achievable reality, and one that avoids the complex risks associated with nuclear power.

A serious public discussion on how India can transition to a — on both the demand and supply sides — is the need of the hour. Such a discussion must involve civil society, experts, and policymakers working together in good faith.

---

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan * Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.

Counterview

Search This Blog