Skip to main content

India's nuclear ambitions: Questions that demand answers

By Shankar Sharma* 
India has set an ambitious target of expanding its nuclear power capacity from the current 9,000 MW to 100,000 MW over the next 20 years. The recently enacted SHANTI Act has added fresh momentum to this push. However, these developments have also raised serious and credible concerns among environmentalists and civil society groups across the country.
Several factors worry these groups — ranging from safety and waste disposal to financial costs and the displacement of local communities. These concerns deserve open, honest engagement from the authorities, not dismissal.
A pattern worth noting in the nuclear sector is that whenever one technology runs into problems, its advocates tend to pivot to the next promising alternative. Today, that alternative is Small Modular Reactors, or SMRs. But a closer look reveals that SMRs carry their own set of unresolved issues. In fact, any nuclear technology — old or new — brings with it broadly the same basket of concerns for society, even if the scale or nature of those concerns may vary.
According to a TERI report, achieving the 100 GW nuclear target by 2047 will require an investment of Rs 25 lakh crore and sweeping policy reforms. This is an enormous commitment of both financial and natural resources. It is therefore essential that all societal concerns are addressed satisfactorily before our communities are locked into this path.
At the same time, we should not overlook the inspiring example right within our own country. Gujarat has emerged as a shining star in India's renewable energy story. The state did not merely participate in the solar revolution — it helped write the rulebook. This demonstrates that clean, sustainable electricity is not a distant dream but an achievable reality, and one that avoids the complex risks associated with nuclear power.
A serious public discussion on how India can transition to a green and sustainable electricity future — on both the demand and supply sides — is the need of the hour. Such a discussion must involve civil society, experts, and policymakers working together in good faith.
---
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka 

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.