Skip to main content

Delhi journalists slam ‘cockroach’ comment by chief justice

By A Representative 
The Delhi Union of Journalists (DUJ) has expressed outrage over remarks reportedly made by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, who described unemployed youth as “cockroaches” and “parasites of society.” The comments, directed at a lawyer during court proceedings, suggested that jobless individuals who turn to media, social media, or activism are undermining the system.
In a strongly worded press release, DUJ said the remarks reflect contempt for those who question governance and policy. The union noted that unemployment is rising due to government economic and social policies, citing even official surveys. It recalled that the CJI had earlier criticised trade unions for hindering industrial growth, and accused him of continuing to “blame the victims.”
The statement, signed by Sujata Madhok, President; S.K. Pande, Vice President; and  A.M. Jigeesh, General Secretary,  emphasised that many professional journalists have been forced out of mainstream media for refusing to align with government narratives. These journalists, often mid-career or highly experienced, now continue their work independently on platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. Journalism graduates, too, struggle to find stable employment and turn to social media to establish themselves. DUJ saluted their resilience in pursuing independent journalism despite limited resources.
According to DUJ, mainstream media is dominated by corporate ownership and reliant on government patronage, which results in coverage that largely reflects official viewpoints. In contrast, social media offers a diversity of voices and perspectives, often critical of those in power. “In that sense, social media is a true platform for democracy,” the union said, adding that it was “extremely distressing” to hear such disparaging remarks from the highest levels of the judiciary.
The union urged judges to empathise with the struggles of unemployed journalists, lawyers, and youth rather than dismissing them as parasites. It reassured journalism students and unemployed youth that questioning the system is essential to democracy and must continue for the betterment of the country.  

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.