Alliance slams unliveable conditions at Bengaluru law school

By A Representative

The advocacy group () has extended its support to the students of the (), Bengaluru, who are protesting against deteriorating living conditions on campus.

In a statement issued on May 15, 2026, NAJAR described the absence of running water in the Women’s Hostels as unacceptable and a violation of the right to life and dignity guaranteed under .

The alliance emphasized that forcing students of a premier legal institution to endure erratic water supply for prolonged periods is not simply an administrative lapse but a denial of basic rights that directly affects their education.

The students have also raised concerns about overcrowding, pointing out that the rapid increase in admissions has not been matched by expansion of infrastructure. NAJAR highlighted the gendered impact of this crisis, noting that women students and those from marginalized genders are disproportionately affected.

The alliance stressed that dignified and safe living conditions are non-negotiable and must be ensured without delay. It criticized the university administration for failing to act despite repeated appeals and expressed concern over the Vice Chancellor’s refusal to openly address the grievances.

Calling the situation deeply troubling, NAJAR urged the NLSIU administration to meet the protesting students, engage with their demands sincerely, and take immediate steps to resolve the crisis, particularly the lack of basic amenities in the Women’s Hostels. The alliance also demanded accountability mechanisms to ensure student grievances are addressed promptly rather than ignored.

NAJAR, an initiative of the () that brings together progressive legal professionals for democratic causes, reiterated its solidarity with the students and called for urgent corrective action.

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan* Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.

Counterview

Search This Blog