Skip to main content

Rutgers academic event on Hindutva draws political backlash, security concerns

By A Representative
 
An academic event at Rutgers University examining Hindu nationalism in the United States has triggered controversy and political reactions, with its organizers reporting online harassment and threats.
The October 27 discussion, titled “Hindutva in America: A Threat to Equality and Religious Pluralism,” was hosted by the university’s Center for Security, Race, and Rights (CSRR). The event explored findings from a recent report that documents what it describes as the growing influence of Hindutva-linked networks in the U.S., including their alleged role in promoting hate and intimidation.
Following the announcement of the event, Rutgers professor of South Asian history Audrey Truschke (photo) said she and fellow panelists received death threats, including one post urging that the speakers be “burned alive.” Truschke has previously faced online harassment for her criticism of Hindu nationalist politics in India.
The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington-based advocacy group, called for protection of all organizers, academics, and students involved. IAMC president Mohammed Jawad said that academic scrutiny of Hindu nationalism “is not only protected free speech but necessary to safeguard minority rights,” while emphasizing that Hinduism as a faith must not be conflated with political Hindutva ideology.
However, several lawmakers — Congress members Sanford Bishop, Suhas Subramanyam, Rich McCormick, and Shri Thanedar — criticized the event and the CSRR report, arguing that it risked “singling out Hindu Americans” and urging Rutgers to promote “diverse perspectives.”
The episode echoes earlier disputes over academic discussions of Hindutva, such as the 2021 Dismantling Global Hindutva Conference, which faced similar backlash and online abuse directed at speakers.
Scholars and human rights researchers say that conflating Hinduism with Hindutva can stifle legitimate academic inquiry and debate. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative have previously documented connections between U.S.-based Hindu nationalist organizations and far-right movements in India.
IAMC urged civic groups and universities to support Rutgers’ academic independence and the safety of its participants amid continuing online threats.

Comments

TRENDING

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple  We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”