Skip to main content

Revisiting non-alignment: India’s foreign policy faces a new test in a divided world

By Prof. Sudhanshu Tripathi* 
While examining the challenges confronting India’s current foreign policy, one finds the country’s leadership clearly supporting a multipolar world order, despite the United States’ still-unmatched dominance and its self-obsessed approach in international relations. This tendency endangers the national interests of relatively weak and developing nations of the so-called Third World, including India—though it is now the world’s fourth-largest economy. Such unilateralism discourages the consolidation of global and regional institutions in a multipolar world and undermines the spirit of multilateral negotiations, causing significant loss to developing nations.
Against this backdrop, India’s national development goals demand freedom of decision-making and independent action, guided by a foreign policy rooted in the doctrine of non-alignment. This doctrine enables India to safeguard its national interests, resist alignment with rival blocs, strengthen the spirit of multipolarity in international relations, and actively participate in all multilateral initiatives promoting peace, progress, and global security.
In today’s changing world, states face considerable challenges—even existential threats—due to structural compulsions in international relations, as noted by the realist scholar John Mearsheimer. Yet India’s ancient moral traditions and rich cultural heritage—characterized by peace, love, tolerance, non-violence, justice, and freedom—embody the ideals of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (“the world is one family”) and Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah (“may all be happy”). These principles underscore India’s enduring policy of humanism and globalism for the welfare of humanity, while upholding strategic autonomy through an independent foreign policy based on non-alignment.
Although critics have dismissed non-alignment as obsolete after the disintegration of the USSR and the end of the Cold War, the growing membership of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) continues to affirm its relevance in the current multipolar order. India and other non-aligned countries have largely adhered to the principles of non-alignment, despite occasional divergences in their national interests. The inherent balance in nature, recognized since Aristotle and by India’s ancient sages, operates at both individual and national levels to restore peace and stability in the world.
India’s foreign policy has always respected this natural law, seeking world peace and universal welfare. In contrast, many powerful Western nations—especially the United States—often pursue short-term national interests while neglecting the collective conscience of humanity, leading to instability, disorder, and widespread suffering. These trends are perpetuated by the structural domination of global financial institutions such as the WTO, World Bank, and IMF, along with military alliances like NATO and ANZUS, and by discriminatory disarmament treaties such as the NPT and CTBT, which preserve the military superiority of major powers. The concentration of veto power in the UN Security Council further entrenches this hierarchical order, leaving developing nations with little voice against these inequities.
These imbalances have fueled economic inequalities and heightened security concerns, visible in recent flashpoints such as US–Iran tensions, the prolonged Russia–Ukraine war, and the escalating Israel–Hamas conflict, which has drawn in Hezbollah and Houthi rebels. Growing hostilities between the US and China, tensions over Taiwan, the Korean peninsula crisis, and China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea further reveal the exploitation of smaller states by powerful nations—violating the principles of the 1648 Peace of Westphalia and the UN Charter that enshrined sovereign equality among states.
The simultaneous rise of China and Russia, allied with Iran, North Korea, and Pakistan, poses new challenges to the US-led liberal-democratic order. The resurgence of imperialist tendencies in US foreign policy under “Trump 2.0” risks deepening rifts within the Anglo-American alliance and the NATO bloc. Historically, American dominance in international relations—beginning after the Treaty of Versailles in 1919—was initially guided by President Woodrow Wilson’s idealism and his Fourteen Points, which sought to promote world peace through the League of Nations. However, ideological rivalry with the Soviet Union after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution shifted US foreign policy from idealism to realism, centered solely on protecting American interests.
This realist approach deeply influenced South Asia, often to India’s detriment, as the US favored Pakistan with military and economic support that strengthened its army, intelligence agencies, and extremist networks united by hostility towards India. As a result, the liberal-democratic world order is now transitioning toward a new framework dominated by emerging economies such as Brazil, South Africa, India, and Argentina, and by regional blocs like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The SCO, comprising China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, and others, has become an important platform for the Global South, promoting economic cooperation and South–South solidarity, principles long championed by the Non-Aligned Movement.
The recent SCO Summit in Tianjin (August–September 2025) reflected this shift, as the emerging “Troika” of Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi appeared to challenge US supremacy. Yet deep-seated mistrust between Russia and China—and India’s own border tensions with Beijing—raise doubts about the durability of this alignment. Meanwhile, the United States, facing economic deficits and lagging behind technologically advanced economies such as Japan, Germany, and China, must now confront a multipolar world replacing the unipolar system that emerged after the Cold War.
India, while preserving its non-aligned orientation, seeks greater access to strategic forums such as the UN Security Council, G8, AUKUS, and the Nuclear Suppliers Group. It also requires advanced technologies in energy, space, supercomputing, defense modernization, and healthcare. At the same time, India faces persistent threats along the McMahon Line from China’s expansionism, as well as cross-border terrorism from Pakistan. Addressing these challenges demands clear and consistent support from Washington—not only for India’s security but for regional stability across South, West, and Central Asia.
The global community must therefore unite against the erosion of liberal and democratic values that once defined the West’s international order. Upholding the spirit of the Peace of Westphalia and the UN Charter’s principle of “sovereign equality of states” remains essential to sustaining a just and peaceful world. The international community must explore a pro-people alternative that challenges exploitative capitalism and neo-imperialism in all forms, rejecting the re-emergence of unipolar domination.
To counter the imperialist designs of the United States and the expansionist ambitions of Russia and China, nations of the Global South—particularly NAM members—must reinforce South–South cooperation and regional partnerships. They should prioritize worker-centric and sustainable development policies over neo-liberal frameworks that serve Western interests. Strengthening multilateral institutions such as BRICS and NAM, and building fair regional trade agreements, is crucial.
Global trade and tariff regimes must also promote fair labour practices, environmental sustainability, and economic justice for developing nations, while reconciling differences between the US and Europe to preserve liberal-democratic traditions rather than empowering autocratic regimes.
Although modern foreign policy often revolves around the pursuit and preservation of power, India’s diplomacy continues to reject narrow self-interest. The current leadership remains committed to independent decision-making while engaging with major powers to advance national goals. India supports a genuinely multipolar world and an inclusive Asia, promoting multilateralism and global cooperation. Its realist approach, grounded in non-alignment and non-conceit, ensures freedom of action and the pursuit of peace, development, and human welfare for all nations.
---
*Department of Political Science, MDPG College, Pratapgarh (UP)

Comments

TRENDING

India's chemical industry: The missing piece of Atmanirbhar Bharat

By N.S. Venkataraman*  Rarely a day passes without the Prime Minister or a cabinet minister speaking about the importance of Atmanirbhar Bharat . The Start-up India scheme is a pillar in promoting this vision, and considerable enthusiasm has been reported in promoting start-up projects across the country. While these developments are positive, Atmanirbhar Bharat does not seem to have made significant progress within the Indian chemical industry . This is a matter of high concern that needs urgent and dispassionate analysis.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Remembering a remarkable rebel: Personal recollections of Comrade Himmat Shah

By Rajiv Shah   I first came in contact with Himmat Shah in the second half of the 1970s during one of my routine visits to Ahmedabad , my maternal hometown. I do not recall the exact year, but at that time I was working in Delhi with the CPI -owned People’s Publishing House (PPH) as its assistant editor, editing books and writing occasional articles for small periodicals. Himmatbhai — as I would call him — worked at the People’s Book House (PBH), the CPI’s bookshop on Relief Road in Ahmedabad.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

As 2024 draws nearer, threatening signs appear of more destructive wars

By Bharat Dogra  The four years from 2020 to 2023 have been very difficult and high risk years for humanity. In the first two years there was a pandemic and such severe disruption of social and economic life that countless people have not yet recovered from its many-sided adverse impacts. In the next two years there were outbreaks of two very high-risk wars which have worldwide implications including escalation into much wider conflicts. In addition there were highly threatening signs of increasing possibility of other very destructive wars. As the year 2023 appears to be headed for ending on a very grim note, there are apprehensions about what the next year 2024 may bring, and there are several kinds of fears. However to come back to the year 2020 first, the pandemic harmed and threatened a very large number of people. No less harmful was the fear epidemic, the epidemic of increasing mental stress and the cruel disruption of the life and livelihoods particularly among the weaker s...

Muslim women’s rights advocates demand criminalisation of polygamy: Petition launched

By A Representative   An online petition seeking a legal ban on polygamy has been floated by Javed Anand, co-editor of Sabrang and National Convener of Indian Muslims for Secular Democracy (IMSD), inviting endorsements from citizens, organisations and activists. The petition, titled “Indian Muslims & Secular Progressive Citizens Demand a Legal Ban on Polygamy,” urges the Central and State governments, Parliament and political parties to abolish polygamy through statutory reform, backed by extensive data from the 2025 national study conducted by the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA).

Bangladesh alternative more vital for NE India than Kaladan project in Myanmar

By Mehjabin Bhanu*  There has been a recent surge in the number of Chin refugees entering Mizoram from the adjacent nation as a result of airstrikes by the Myanmar Army on ethnic insurgents and intense fighting along the border between India and Myanmar. Uncertainty has surrounded India's Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport project, which uses Sittwe port in Myanmar, due to the recent outbreak of hostilities along the Mizoram-Myanmar border. Construction on the road portion of the Kaladan project, which runs from Paletwa in Myanmar to Zorinpui in Mizoram, was resumed thanks to the time of relative calm during the intermittent period. However, recent unrest has increased concerns about missing the revised commissioning goal dates. The project's goal is to link northeastern states with the rest of India via an alternate route, using the Sittwe port in Myanmar. In addition to this route, India can also connect the region with the rest of India through Assam by using the Chittagon...