Skip to main content

Revisiting non-alignment: India’s foreign policy faces a new test in a divided world

By Prof. Sudhanshu Tripathi* 
While examining the challenges confronting India’s current foreign policy, one finds the country’s leadership clearly supporting a multipolar world order, despite the United States’ still-unmatched dominance and its self-obsessed approach in international relations. This tendency endangers the national interests of relatively weak and developing nations of the so-called Third World, including India—though it is now the world’s fourth-largest economy. Such unilateralism discourages the consolidation of global and regional institutions in a multipolar world and undermines the spirit of multilateral negotiations, causing significant loss to developing nations.
Against this backdrop, India’s national development goals demand freedom of decision-making and independent action, guided by a foreign policy rooted in the doctrine of non-alignment. This doctrine enables India to safeguard its national interests, resist alignment with rival blocs, strengthen the spirit of multipolarity in international relations, and actively participate in all multilateral initiatives promoting peace, progress, and global security.
In today’s changing world, states face considerable challenges—even existential threats—due to structural compulsions in international relations, as noted by the realist scholar John Mearsheimer. Yet India’s ancient moral traditions and rich cultural heritage—characterized by peace, love, tolerance, non-violence, justice, and freedom—embody the ideals of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (“the world is one family”) and Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah (“may all be happy”). These principles underscore India’s enduring policy of humanism and globalism for the welfare of humanity, while upholding strategic autonomy through an independent foreign policy based on non-alignment.
Although critics have dismissed non-alignment as obsolete after the disintegration of the USSR and the end of the Cold War, the growing membership of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) continues to affirm its relevance in the current multipolar order. India and other non-aligned countries have largely adhered to the principles of non-alignment, despite occasional divergences in their national interests. The inherent balance in nature, recognized since Aristotle and by India’s ancient sages, operates at both individual and national levels to restore peace and stability in the world.
India’s foreign policy has always respected this natural law, seeking world peace and universal welfare. In contrast, many powerful Western nations—especially the United States—often pursue short-term national interests while neglecting the collective conscience of humanity, leading to instability, disorder, and widespread suffering. These trends are perpetuated by the structural domination of global financial institutions such as the WTO, World Bank, and IMF, along with military alliances like NATO and ANZUS, and by discriminatory disarmament treaties such as the NPT and CTBT, which preserve the military superiority of major powers. The concentration of veto power in the UN Security Council further entrenches this hierarchical order, leaving developing nations with little voice against these inequities.
These imbalances have fueled economic inequalities and heightened security concerns, visible in recent flashpoints such as US–Iran tensions, the prolonged Russia–Ukraine war, and the escalating Israel–Hamas conflict, which has drawn in Hezbollah and Houthi rebels. Growing hostilities between the US and China, tensions over Taiwan, the Korean peninsula crisis, and China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea further reveal the exploitation of smaller states by powerful nations—violating the principles of the 1648 Peace of Westphalia and the UN Charter that enshrined sovereign equality among states.
The simultaneous rise of China and Russia, allied with Iran, North Korea, and Pakistan, poses new challenges to the US-led liberal-democratic order. The resurgence of imperialist tendencies in US foreign policy under “Trump 2.0” risks deepening rifts within the Anglo-American alliance and the NATO bloc. Historically, American dominance in international relations—beginning after the Treaty of Versailles in 1919—was initially guided by President Woodrow Wilson’s idealism and his Fourteen Points, which sought to promote world peace through the League of Nations. However, ideological rivalry with the Soviet Union after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution shifted US foreign policy from idealism to realism, centered solely on protecting American interests.
This realist approach deeply influenced South Asia, often to India’s detriment, as the US favored Pakistan with military and economic support that strengthened its army, intelligence agencies, and extremist networks united by hostility towards India. As a result, the liberal-democratic world order is now transitioning toward a new framework dominated by emerging economies such as Brazil, South Africa, India, and Argentina, and by regional blocs like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The SCO, comprising China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, and others, has become an important platform for the Global South, promoting economic cooperation and South–South solidarity, principles long championed by the Non-Aligned Movement.
The recent SCO Summit in Tianjin (August–September 2025) reflected this shift, as the emerging “Troika” of Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi appeared to challenge US supremacy. Yet deep-seated mistrust between Russia and China—and India’s own border tensions with Beijing—raise doubts about the durability of this alignment. Meanwhile, the United States, facing economic deficits and lagging behind technologically advanced economies such as Japan, Germany, and China, must now confront a multipolar world replacing the unipolar system that emerged after the Cold War.
India, while preserving its non-aligned orientation, seeks greater access to strategic forums such as the UN Security Council, G8, AUKUS, and the Nuclear Suppliers Group. It also requires advanced technologies in energy, space, supercomputing, defense modernization, and healthcare. At the same time, India faces persistent threats along the McMahon Line from China’s expansionism, as well as cross-border terrorism from Pakistan. Addressing these challenges demands clear and consistent support from Washington—not only for India’s security but for regional stability across South, West, and Central Asia.
The global community must therefore unite against the erosion of liberal and democratic values that once defined the West’s international order. Upholding the spirit of the Peace of Westphalia and the UN Charter’s principle of “sovereign equality of states” remains essential to sustaining a just and peaceful world. The international community must explore a pro-people alternative that challenges exploitative capitalism and neo-imperialism in all forms, rejecting the re-emergence of unipolar domination.
To counter the imperialist designs of the United States and the expansionist ambitions of Russia and China, nations of the Global South—particularly NAM members—must reinforce South–South cooperation and regional partnerships. They should prioritize worker-centric and sustainable development policies over neo-liberal frameworks that serve Western interests. Strengthening multilateral institutions such as BRICS and NAM, and building fair regional trade agreements, is crucial.
Global trade and tariff regimes must also promote fair labour practices, environmental sustainability, and economic justice for developing nations, while reconciling differences between the US and Europe to preserve liberal-democratic traditions rather than empowering autocratic regimes.
Although modern foreign policy often revolves around the pursuit and preservation of power, India’s diplomacy continues to reject narrow self-interest. The current leadership remains committed to independent decision-making while engaging with major powers to advance national goals. India supports a genuinely multipolar world and an inclusive Asia, promoting multilateralism and global cooperation. Its realist approach, grounded in non-alignment and non-conceit, ensures freedom of action and the pursuit of peace, development, and human welfare for all nations.
---
*Department of Political Science, MDPG College, Pratapgarh (UP)

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.