Skip to main content

How Trump is using extreme right leader's newfound Nobel status against Venezuela

By Carlos Ron
 
On Friday, 10 October 2025, Venezuela’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Samuel Moncada, delivered a serious and urgent warning during an emergency session of the Security Council, asserting that Venezuela’s peace and security —and that of the entire region— is under imminent threat of military aggression by the United States.
Hostility from Washington towards progressive governments in Caracas is not new, but the current Administration has initiated an unprecedented escalation against the government and people of Venezuela. Under the declared pretext of stepping up the war against drug-trafficking, the U.S. has deployed a significant array of military assets to the Caribbean, including destroyers, missile cruisers, F-35 fighter jets, surveillance planes, an attack submarine, over 4,000 Marines, and even a nuclear submarine. 
The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, also announced a new task force in the Caribbean, but analysts and former officials have suggested that the primary goal is to pressure the government of Nicolás Maduro and potentially pursue regime change.
The Trump Administration has shifted its focus from questioning democratic credentials to accusing Venezuelan leaders of being an international crime organization involved in drug trafficking. This narrative shift is significant, as a campaign presented as an extension of the domestic ‘war on drugs’ may garner more support from Trump’s political base than a new foreign military intervention. This focus has led to the revival of baseless criminal allegations to manufacture consent.
By August, US authorities raised to $50 million a reward for President Maduro accusing him of leading the so-called Cartel de los Soles, an alleged military-run drug cartel whose very existence has been doubted in the past even by the State Department. Likewise, an extinct prison gang known as Tren de Aragua, has been used to criminalize both Maduro and Venezuelan migrants.
The U.S. government has used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport and detain 252 Venezuelans in a high-security prison in El Salvador. Legal experts have deemed the invocation of this centuries-old, wartime law legally and morally questionable, arguing that applying it to alleged Tren de Aragua members in a non-declared war setting bypasses due process and sets a dangerous precedent. 
After negotiations with the Venezuelan government, they were eventually freed, but Venezuelans are still the target of racist and violent immigration policies. Ambassador Moncada denounced the US for continuing to detain 78 Venezuelan children, separated from their parents.
A Nobel Prize for Regime Change
A missing element for a post-regime change transition in Venezuela was an internationally credible figure to assume power. That role is now being filled by extremist opposition figure María Corina Machado. Nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, Machado’s newfound status as a Nobel Laureate is helping to reconstruct her international image as a fierce defender of democracy—despite the fact that she participated in the 2002 coup ceremony against President Hugo Chávez and signed the notorious “Carmona Decree” to dissolve all state institutions and the constitution for 48 hours.
For years, Machado headed the NGO Súmate, which faced charges of treason and conspiracy for receiving funding from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for its activities, which include the unsuccessful 2004 recall campaign against Chávez. Under the Maduro Administration, Machado consistently advocated for non-recognition of government authority, undermined the electoral system, supported U.S. sanctions on the economy, and promoted violent protests known as “guarimbas” in 2014 and 2017.
As a steadfast ally of Israel, Machado signed a cooperation agreement with Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party, and wrote to him asking for support in the U.N. Security Council for a “regime change operation” against the Venezuelan government. After the 2024 elections where she eventually backed former diplomat Edmundo González and claimed victory, her political movement refused to undergo the electoral audit carried out by the Venezuelan Supreme Court. As her popularity and leadership dwindled after months of self-imposed clandestinity, the Nobel Prize now serves as a significant boost to her international standing, coinciding with increased U.S. pressure.
From Threats to Extrajudicial Executions

Washington is clearly trying to reaffirm its dominance over Latin America in light of China’s economic and technological growth. It has lost tolerance for Venezuela’s independent foreign policy, which has strengthened not only its ties with China —both countries subscribed an ‘All-Weather’ strategic partnership in 2023— but with Russia, Iran, OPEC, and other regional partners. In Moncada’s appeal to the Security Council, he highlighted the U.S. ‘addiction to oil’ as the true reason it exerts new pressure on Venezuela, which holds the world’s largest proven reserves.
The most disturbing aspect of the escalation has been the recent U.S. military strikes against at least 4 vessels in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of 21 individuals without due process, identification, or evidence that they posed an imminent threat. Even Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro criticized these operations and suggested that some of the alleged traffickers were actually Colombian citizens. Legal analysis from organizations like the New York City Bar Association suggests these attacks are unlawful summary executions and a clear violation of international law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of life.
By not conforming to standard international practices for drug interdictions, the Trump Administration is terrorizing the Caribbean and reinforcing the view that it is after regime change in Venezuela, not drugs. The Trump Administration has declared itself as taking part in a “non-international armed conflict,” dismissing legal restraints in the use of military force.
Regime change and wars for oil come at a price. The 20-year occupation of Afghanistan ended in hundreds of thousands of deaths, a panicked retreat, and the reestablishment of previous conditions. Iraq and Libya are a long way from recovering from the destruction of recent wars, while in the U.S., veterans and their families must deal with increasing poverty, a widespread culture of violence, and a growing mental health crisis. 50 years of the War on Drugs has not eradicated consumption, but rather consolidated drug trade and distribution in all 50 states. The U.S. defeat in Vietnam is a reminder that a people determined to be free cannot be subdued. Venezuelans are determined to exercise their sovereignty, guarantee their future, and defend their peace.
---
This article was produced by BreakThrough News and Globetrotter. Carlos Ron is Co-Coordinator of the Nuestra America office of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research. He is a former Venezuelan diplomat who served as Vice Minister for North America (2018-2025)

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.