Behind the numbers: What the Rajya Sabha results reveal about J&K politics

By Raqif Makhdoomi*

After a gap of four years, were finally held in . These are —meaning the people do not vote directly, but their elected representatives do. Similar to , the process relies on votes cast by legislators.

This time, the elections took an unexpected turn when the alleged at a rally that some National Conference (NC) MLAs were preparing to switch sides to the . The timing of the claim—just before the Rajya Sabha polls—sparked public curiosity. Would there be , or was it just political posturing?

The ruling National Conference found itself in a difficult position. Its ally, the , was upset that it was not given a “.” NC decided to contest three seats and offered one to Congress—the one they were least confident of winning. Congress viewed this as a betrayal. When asked about the party’s stance on supporting the NC candidate, the state Congress chief deferred the decision to the central leadership, hinting that all was not well within the alliance.

Sensing trouble, the National Conference changed tone—from confrontation to persuasion. It began appealing to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), its uneasy ally Congress, and other like-minded legislators to help “keep the BJP away.” Ironically, the same PDP that NC leaders had accused of being close to the BJP now became a key player. PDP chief and former Chief Minister held a press conference declaring support for the NC candidate, though with a condition: her party would vote for NC as a third preference rather than a fourth. She explained that NC itself was unsure of securing the fourth seat, and PDP would not shoulder the risk if things went wrong. The PDP even issued a whip directing its MLAs to vote for the NC.

The Deputy Chief Minister confidently claimed that NC would win all four seats, while the BJP, contesting three, also expressed optimism. One seat was uncontested, meaning NC only had to manage three.

When results came, NC did win three—but the fourth seat shocked everyone. BJP, despite lacking the required numbers, secured 33 votes, while the NC candidate got only 21. The question now is: how did BJP manage seven extra votes?

It cannot be blamed on ’s group, which abstained from voting. Both Congress and PDP had issued whips to their MLAs to vote for NC, so defying those orders would have attracted legal consequences. Independents like , , and publicly stated they voted for NC. So who helped the BJP?

Was the Leader of Opposition right when he said that “all is not well” within the NC? Perhaps. When was asked why he did not contest the Rajya Sabha polls, he said he needed to “look into matters at home,” hinting at internal discord. Given how his government was once toppled in the past, such a possibility cannot be dismissed today.

In the Assembly, there were heated exchanges between the Deputy Chief Minister and the opposition BJP over cross-voting. The Deputy CM’s cryptic remark—“Don’t force me to tell the truth. I know everything”—only deepened the mystery. If he truly knows the truth, why not share it with the public? Or is this all part of a larger drama to keep people guessing while the alliance quietly continues?

Some NC leaders have started blaming the PDP, but the public is unconvinced. The PDP’s whip was clear, and any defiance would have triggered legal scrutiny. Instead of pointing fingers, the NC should look inward. It is likely that a few of its own members voted for the BJP to secure personal advantages or safety. Even the Chief Minister acknowledged that some within the party voted against its interests. If that’s known, why not be transparent about it?

Jammu and Kashmir cannot afford another political episode like the one involving . The region’s fragile stability cannot withstand fresh turmoil. The National Conference must abandon its “Maharaja” mindset and function like a truly democratic party—accountable to the people, not merely to its power brokers.

---

*Law student and human rights activist

Comments

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram* When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Search This Blog