Creative destruction? The myth of ‘better capitalism’ behind the 2025 Economics Nobel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*

The has awarded the to , , and “for having explained .” According to the , one half of the prize goes to Professor Joel Mokyr “for having identified the ,” while the other half is shared by Professors Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt “for the .”

Ideologically, the three laureates view modern prosperity as the outcome of innovation nurtured by . They reject revolutionary change, arguing instead that capitalism—when improved through the process of —can drive technological progress and sustainable economic growth. Yet this belief in “better capitalism” overlooks the system’s internal contradictions and exploitative nature. It conceals capitalism’s failures and crises, dressing them up as innovation. This is not mere naivety but a selective, ideologically driven reading of history that privileges capital over people and the planet. In truth, there is no such thing as “better capitalism.”

The much-celebrated concept of innovation-driven growth through creative destruction is itself rooted in the ideology of —a mechanism that ensures continuous profit by rendering products and technologies outdated. This process has evolved from industrial capitalism to today’s , where control over data and algorithms defines power. Western economies continue to hide behind the that technological change inherently leads to progress, when in fact it often reproduces inequality and alienation. Technology may increase productivity, but what is truly creative is human labour. Machines merely extend repetitive, lifeless functions, while it is the ingenuity of workers that fuels innovation and growth. Undermining labour’s role through technological domination ultimately erodes productivity and innovation itself.

History shows that technological revolutions—from steam engines to artificial intelligence—have not automatically yielded higher productivity. Economist ’s 2023 study Why Isn’t Digitalisation Improving Productivity Growth? highlights the “.” Similarly, a UK Government review on “” finds that technology diffusion does not necessarily drive economic growth. In contrast, China’s experience suggests that rejecting the ideology of planned obsolescence allows digital innovation to contribute more effectively to productivity and development.

Capitalism’s creative destruction thus exploits and disciplines labour through new technologies, deepening the productivity paradox under digital capitalism. The emancipation of labour from capitalist domination is essential if both technology and human creativity are to flourish. A genuinely sustainable and inclusive model of economic growth requires the —its collective ownership, operation, and management—so that innovation serves all rather than enriching a few.

Today’s technological progress benefits a minority while marginalising the majority, perpetuating the same inequalities that capitalism has always produced. A society cannot be truly prosperous when abundance is reserved for a few and deprivation persists for many. Only when technology meets the needs of all can we envision a world free from exploitation and destitution. There is, therefore, little novelty in awarding a Nobel Prize to a theory that continues to romanticise capitalism under a different name. “Better capitalism” and “sustainable growth” remain contradictory illusions. The , celebrating creative destruction, merely reaffirms that illusion—without offering anything genuinely new.

---

*Academic based in UK

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava* Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.

Search This Blog